This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (16)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Oliver F. Roddey, Jr, MD; Herbert W. Clegg, MD; Edward S. Martin, MD; Raymond L. Swetenburg, MD; Elizabeth W. Koonce, MD

JAMA. 1995;274(23):1863-1865.

Abstract
Objective.
—To compare a single-plate method for the recovery of group A streptococci with other methods that have recently been reported as being significantly more sensitive.

Design.
—Throat swabs were allowed to dry for 2 to 6 hours before inoculating 5% sheep blood agar plates. Stabs were made into the agar, bacitracin disks were placed on the primary plates, and the cultures were incubated aerobically. Using duplicate throat swabs, the recovery rates of the above method were compared with the following ones: a carbon dioxide—enhanced incubation atmosphere, an anaerobic atmosphere with a selective blood agar medium, and a Todd-Hewitt broth medium.

Setting.
—A five-pediatrician office.

Patients.
—A total of 301 pediatric patients with pharyngitis were evaluated using all comparative methods. In addition, duplicate swabs from 590 pediatric patients were compared with each other using the same single-plate method.

Results.
—There were no significant differences between any of the methods. The sensitivity of the single-plate method compared with selective plates incubated anaerobically was 96%.

Conclusions.
—In a pediatric office setting, a single-plate method using aerobic incubation was adequately sensitive for the recovery of group A β-hemolytic streptococci. Transport medium, selective medium, carbon dioxide enhancement, and anaerobic incubation did not significantly improve recovery. The present federal regulations that restrict the use of nonselective media and bacitracin disks on primary plates should be reevaluated.

(JAMA. 1995;274:1863-1865)

Author Affiliations
From Eastover Pediatrics and Presbyterian Hospital, Charlotte, NC.

Footnotes
Reprints not available.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Influence of Sampling Technique on Detection of Potential Pathogens in the Nasopharynx.
van der Veen et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:752-755.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recovering Streptococci from the Throat, a Practical Alternative to Direct Plating in Remote Tropical Communities
McDonald et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006;44:547-552.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rapid Diagnosis of Pharyngitis Caused by Group A Streptococci
Gerber and Shulman
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004;17:571-580.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and Management of Adults with Pharyngitis
Neuner and Aronson
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:763-763.
FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and Management of Adults with Pharyngitis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Neuner et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:113-122.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reply
Pichichero and Elmwood Pediatric Group
CLIN PEDIATR 2001;40:531-531.
 

Group A Strep Cultures: Back to Basics
Journal Watch Cardiology 1996;1996:16-16.
FULL TEXT  

Group A Strep Cultures: Back to Basics
Journal Watch Dermatology 1996;1996:13-13.
FULL TEXT  

GROUP A STREP CULTURES: BACK TO BASICS
JWatch General 1996;1996:7-7.
FULL TEXT