You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 274 No. 23, December 20, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

The WHO analgesic ladder for cancer pain management. Stepping up the quality of its evaluation

A. R. Jadad and G. P. Browman
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVE--To perform a systematic review of studies evaluating the effectiveness of the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder as an intervention for cancer pain management. DATA SOURCES--Systematic search of MEDLINE from 1982 to 1995, hand search of textbooks and meeting proceedings, reference lists, and direct contact with authors. STUDY SELECTION--Studies of any methodological design were included if they evaluated patients with cancer pain treated according to the WHO analgesic ladder and if the studies provided enough information to estimate the proportion of patients who achieved adequate analgesia with the use of the ladder. The strength of the evidence provided by each study was assessed separately by both authors using current concepts. DATA EXTRACTION--From the hard copy of each study report, the first author's name, publication year, study design, number of dropouts per study, and proportion of patients with adequate analgesia in each study were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS--Eight studies purporting to evaluate the effectiveness of the WHO ladder were included in the review. Meta-analysis was not performed because the studies were case series with no control groups. The studies had other limitation: none provided information on the conditions in which pain was assessed; two were retrospective; one had short follow-up periods; three had high withdrawal rates; and one had variable follow-up periods. Analgesia was adequate in 69% to 100% of patients analyzed in the studies. CONCLUSIONS--The studies available provide valuable information on the course of cancer pain and its treatment. However, the evidence they provide is insufficient to estimate confidently the effectiveness of the WHO analgesic ladder for the management of cancer pain. Until results from carefully designed controlled trials are available, it would be inappropriate to judge the performance of clinicians, programs, and institutions or to design policies based on such evidence.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Managing Cancer Pain With Nonpharmacologic and Complementary Therapies
Pujol and Monti
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 2007;107:ES15-ES21.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Provision for advanced pain management techniques in adult palliative care: a national survey of anaesthetic pain specialists
Kay et al.
Palliat Med 2007;21:279-284.
ABSTRACT  

Efficacy of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Therapies in Relieving Cancer Pain: A Systematic Review
Bardia et al.
JCO 2006;24:5457-5464.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Efficacy of the World Health Organization Analgesic Ladder to Treat Pain in End-Stage Renal Disease
Barakzoy and Moss
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006;17:3198-3203.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality Measures for Symptoms and Advance Care Planning in Cancer: A Systematic Review
Lorenz et al.
JCO 2006;24:4933-4938.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Oxycodone for Cancer-Related Pain: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Reid et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:837-843.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nonpharmacologic and Complementary Approaches to Cancer Pain Management
Menefee and Monti
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 2005;105:S15-S20.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The role of opioids in cancer pain
Quigley
BMJ 2005;331:825-829.
FULL TEXT  

Pain and pain treatments in European palliative care units. A cross sectional survey from the European Association for Palliative Care Research Network
Klepstad et al.
Palliat Med 2005;19:477-484.
ABSTRACT  

Opioid analgesics for cancer pain in primary care
DTB 2005;43:9-12.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The World Health Organization three-step analgesic ladder comes of age
Reid and Davies
Palliat Med 2004;18:175-176.
 

Analgesia for patients with advanced disease: I
Hall and Sykes
Postgrad. Med. J. 2004;80:148-154.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cancer pain management in Lanarkshire: a communitybased audit
Oxenham et al.
Palliat Med 2003;17:708-713.
ABSTRACT  

Chronic Pain Following Treatment for Cancer: The Role of Opioids
Ballantyne
The Oncologist 2003;8:567-575.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Individualized Patient Education and Coaching to Improve Pain Control Among Cancer Outpatients
Oliver et al.
JCO 2001;19:2206-2212.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Responding to Intractable Terminal Suffering: The Role of Terminal Sedation and Voluntary Refusal of Food and Fluids
Quill et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2000;132:408-414.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Empirical Comparison of Commonly Used Measures to Evaluate Pain Treatment in Cancer Patients With Chronic Pain
de Wit et al.
JCO 1999;17:1280-1280.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.