You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 274 No. 3, July 19, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Looking through a keyhole at the tobacco industry. The Brown and Williamson documents

S. A. Glantz, D. E. Barnes, L. Bero, P. Hanauer and J. Slade
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0124, USA.

OBJECTIVE--To introduce a series of papers discussing previously undocumented tobacco industry activities regarding strategies to avoid products liability litigation, understand nicotine addiction, and manipulate both internal and external scientific research on the effects of both active and passive smoking. DATA SOURCES--Documents from Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation (B&W), the British American Tobacco Company (BAT), and other tobacco interests provided by an anonymous source, obtained from Congress, and received from the private papers of a former BAT officer. STUDY SELECTION--All available materials, including confidential reports regarding research and internal memoranda exchanged between tobacco industry lawyers. CONCLUSIONS--These documents provide our first look at the inner workings of the tobacco industry during the crucial period in which the scientific case that smoking is addictive and kills smokers solidified. The documents show a sophisticated legal and public relations strategy to avoid liability for the diseases induced by tobacco use. The documents show that lawyers steered scientists away from particular research avenues, which is inconsistent with the company's purported disbelief in the causation and addiction claims; if the company had been genuinely unconvinced by the causation and addiction hypotheses, then it should have had no concern that new research would provide ammunition for the enemy. Quite the contrary, the documents show that B&W and BAT recognized more than 30 years ago that nicotine is addictive and that tobacco smoke is "biologically active" (eg, carcinogenic).

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evarts A. Graham and the First Pneumonectomy for Lung Cancer
Horn and Johnson
JCO 2008;26:3268-3275.
FULL TEXT  

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
Vandenbroucke et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:W-163-W-194.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Cigarette Controversy
Cummings et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1070-1076.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Every document and picture tells a story: using internal corporate document reviews, semiotics, and content analysis to assess tobacco advertising
Anderson et al.
Tobacco Control 2006;15:254-261.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tobacco document research reporting
Carter
Tobacco Control 2005;14:368-376.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The most important and influential papers in tobacco control: results of an online poll
Chapman
Tobacco Control 2005;14:e1-e1.
FULL TEXT  

"We are anxious to remain anonymous": the use of third party scientific and medical consultants by the Australian tobacco industry, 1969 to 1979
Chapman
Tobacco Control 2003;12:iii31-37.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST): A Report of Outcomes
Stillman et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:1681-1691.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development of a model of the tobacco industry's interference with tobacco control programmes
Trochim et al.
Tobacco Control 2003;12:140-147.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Control: An Update to Influence Policy-Making Decisions
Heath et al.
Policy Politics Nursing Practice 2003;4:36-44.
ABSTRACT  

Exposing Mr Butts' tricks of the trade
Cummings and Pollay
Tobacco Control 2002;11:i1-4.
FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Dependence Curricula in Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Education
Heath et al.
Am J Crit Care 2002;11:27-33.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Universities and tobacco money
Cohen
BMJ 2001;323:1-2.
FULL TEXT  

A Future Without Tobacco: A Call for Papers
Cole
JAMA 1999;282:1284-1284.
FULL TEXT  

Institutional addiction to tobacco
COHEN et al.
Tobacco Control 1999;8:70-74.
FULL TEXT  

The Cigarette Papers
Daynard
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1999;24:1400-1403.
 

Prying Open the Door to the Tobacco Industry's Secrets About Nicotine: The Minnesota Tobacco Trial
Hurt and Robertson
JAMA 1998;280:1173-1181.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

"The Tobacco Products Research Trust 1982-1996"
SWANN et al.
Tobacco Control 1998;7:193-193.
FULL TEXT  

Substance Misuse: What Have We Learned?
Stanton
Promotion & Education 1997;4:37-40.
 

AMA ACCUSES TOBACCO SELLERS OF DUPING THE PUBLIC
JWatch General 1995;1995:6-6.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.