This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The Brown and Williamson Documents

Peter Hanauer, LLB; John Slade, MD; Deborah E. Barnes; Lisa Bero, PhD; Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

JAMA. 1995;274(3):234-240.

Abstract
Objective.
—To understand how attorneys for the tobacco industry in general, and Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation (B&W) in particular, have responded to the threat of products liability litigation arising from smoking-induced diseases.

Data Sources.
—Documents from B&W, the British American Tobacco Company (BAT), and othertobacco interests provided by an anonymous source, obtained from Congress, or received from the private papers of a former BAT officer.

Study Selection.
—All available materials, including confidential reports regarding research and internal memoranda exchanged between tobacco industry lawyers.

Conclusions.
—The documents demonstrate that the tobacco industry in general, and B&W in particular, were very concerned about the threat of products liability lawsuits, and they illustrate some of the steps taken by lawyers at one company to avoid the discovery of documents that might be useful to a plaintiff in such a lawsuit. These steps included efforts to control the language of scientific discourse on issues related to smoking and health, to bring all potentially damaging internal scientific documents under attorney work product and attorney-client privilege to avoid discovery, to remove "deadwood" documents, and to insulate B&W from knowledge of potentially damaging scientific information from other BAT companies.

(JAMA. 1995;274:234-240)

Author Affiliations
From the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco (Mr Hanauer, Ms Barnes, and Drs Bero and Glantz), and the Department of Medicine, St Peter's Medical Center, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick (Dr Slade).

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Division of Cardiology, Box 0124, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0124 (Dr Glantz).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Open Doorway to Truth: Legacy of the Minnesota Tobacco Trial
Hurt et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:446-456.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tobacco industry lawyers as "disease vectors"
Guardino and Daynard
Tobacco Control 2007;16:224-228.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Cigarette Controversy
Cummings et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1070-1076.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Challenging the epidemiologic evidence on passive smoking: tactics of tobacco industry expert witnesses
Francis et al.
Tobacco Control 2006;15:iv68-iv76.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Every document and picture tells a story: using internal corporate document reviews, semiotics, and content analysis to assess tobacco advertising
Anderson et al.
Tobacco Control 2006;15:254-261.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke
Hong and Bero
BMJ 2002;325:1413-1416.
FULL TEXT  

Exposing Mr Butts' tricks of the trade
Cummings and Pollay
Tobacco Control 2002;11:i1-4.
FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Dependence Curricula in Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Education
Heath et al.
Am J Crit Care 2002;11:27-33.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Science in regulatory policy making: case studies in the development of workplace smoking restrictions
Bero et al.
Tobacco Control 2001;10:329-336.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Cigarette Papers
Daynard
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1999;24:1400-1403.
 

Prying Open the Door to the Tobacco Industry's Secrets About Nicotine: The Minnesota Tobacco Trial
Hurt and Robertson
JAMA 1998;280:1173-1181.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Litigation: Issues for Public Health and Public Policy
Glantz et al.
JAMA 1997;277:751-753.
ABSTRACT  

Looking Through a Keyhole at the Tobacco Industry: The Brown and Williamson Documents
Glantz et al.
JAMA 1995;274:219-224.
ABSTRACT  

Nicotine and Addiction: The Brown and Williamson Documents
Slade et al.
JAMA 1995;274:225-233.
ABSTRACT  

Environmental Tobacco Smoke: The Brown and Williamson Documents
Barnes et al.
JAMA 1995;274:248-253.
ABSTRACT  

The Brown and Williamson Documents: Where Do We Go From Here?
Todd et al.
JAMA 1995;274:256-258.
ABSTRACT