This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The Brown and Williamson Documents

Lisa Bero, PhD; Deborah E. Barnes; Peter Hanauer, LLB; John Slade, MD; Stanton A. Glantz, PhD

JAMA. 1995;274(3):241-247.

Abstract
Objective.
—To examine the involvement of tobacco industry lawyers in the selection of tobacco industry scientific research projects and to examine how the research was used to influence public policy.

Data Sources.
—Documents from Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation, the British American Tobacco Company (BAT), and other tobacco interests provided by an anonymous source, obtained from Congress, and received from the private papers of a former BAT officer.

Study Selection.
—All available materials, including confidential reports regarding research and internal memoranda exchanged between tobacco industry lawyers.

Conclusions.
—The involvement of tobacco industry lawyers in the selection of scientific projects to be funded is in sharp contrast to the industry's public statements about its review process for its external research program. Scientific merit played little role in the selection of external research projects. The results of the projects were used to generate good publicity for the industry, to deflect attention away from tobacco use as a health danger, and to attempt, sometimes surreptitiously, to influence policymakers.

(JAMA. 1995;274:241-247)

Author Affiliations
From the Institute for Health Policy Studies, Department of Medicine and Division of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco (Drs Bero and Glantz, Ms Barnes, and Mr Hanauer), and the Department of Medicine, St Peter's Medical Center, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick (Dr Slade).

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Division of Cardiology, Box 0124, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0124 (Dr Glantz).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Criteria for evaluating tobacco control research funding programs and their application to models that include financial support from the tobacco industry
Cohen et al.
Tobacco Control 2009;18:228-234.
FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Use Among Individuals With Schizophrenia: What Role Has the Tobacco Industry Played?
Prochaska et al.
Schizophr Bull 2008;34:555-567.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tobacco industry lawyers as "disease vectors"
Guardino and Daynard
Tobacco Control 2007;16:224-228.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Cigarette Controversy
Cummings et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1070-1076.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Old ways, new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientists since the Master Settlement Agreement
Schick and Glantz
Tobacco Control 2007;16:157-164.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

'It's interesting how few people die from smoking': Tobacco industry efforts to minimize risk and discredit health promotion
Smith
Eur J Public Health 2007;17:162-170.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Creation of Industry Front Groups: The Tobacco Industry and "Get Government Off Our Back"
Apollonio and Bero
AJPH 2007;97:419-427.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Every document and picture tells a story: using internal corporate document reviews, semiotics, and content analysis to assess tobacco advertising
Anderson et al.
Tobacco Control 2006;15:254-261.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Industry Influence on Science and Scientists in Germany
Gruning et al.
AJPH 2006;96:20-32.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tobacco industry influence on the definition of tobacco related disorders by the American Psychiatric Association
Neuman et al.
Tobacco Control 2005;14:328-337.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Research from tobacco industry affiliated authors: need for particular vigilance
Chapman
Tobacco Control 2005;14:217-219.
FULL TEXT  

A tobacco industry study of airline cabin air quality: dropping inconvenient findings
Neilsen and Glantz
Tobacco Control 2004;13:i20-29.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

"Some convincing arguments to pass back to nervous customers": the role of the tobacco retailer in the Australian tobacco industry's smoker reassurance campaign 1950-1978
Tofler and Chapman
Tobacco Control 2003;12:iii7-12.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Industry Efforts to Defeat the Occupational Safety and Health Administration Indoor Air Quality Rule
Bryan-Jones and Bero
AJPH 2003;93:585-592.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke
Hong and Bero
BMJ 2002;325:1413-1416.
FULL TEXT  

Exposing Mr Butts' tricks of the trade
Cummings and Pollay
Tobacco Control 2002;11:i1-4.
FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Dependence Curricula in Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Education
Heath et al.
Am J Crit Care 2002;11:27-33.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Science in regulatory policy making: case studies in the development of workplace smoking restrictions
Bero et al.
Tobacco Control 2001;10:329-336.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Policy makers' perspectives on tobacco control advocates' roles in regulation development
Montini and Bero
Tobacco Control 2001;10:218-224.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Even a Little Secondhand Smoke Is Dangerous
Glantz and Parmley
JAMA 2001;286:462-463.
FULL TEXT  

Institutional addiction to tobacco
COHEN et al.
Tobacco Control 1999;8:70-74.
FULL TEXT  

The Cigarette Papers
Daynard
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1999;24:1400-1403.
 

Prying Open the Door to the Tobacco Industry's Secrets About Nicotine: The Minnesota Tobacco Trial
Hurt and Robertson
JAMA 1998;280:1173-1181.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Why Review Articles on the Health Effects of Passive Smoking Reach Different Conclusions
Barnes and Bero
JAMA 1998;279:1566-1570.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Litigation: Issues for Public Health and Public Policy
Glantz et al.
JAMA 1997;277:751-753.
ABSTRACT  

Industry-Funded Research and Conflict of Interest: An Analysis of Research Sponsored by the Tobacco Industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research
Barnes and Bero
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1996;21:515-542.
ABSTRACT  

The Tobacco Industry and the Brown and Williamson Documents
Sterling
JAMA 1996;275:279-280.
ABSTRACT  

Looking Through a Keyhole at the Tobacco Industry: The Brown and Williamson Documents
Glantz et al.
JAMA 1995;274:219-224.
ABSTRACT  

Environmental Tobacco Smoke: The Brown and Williamson Documents
Barnes et al.
JAMA 1995;274:248-253.
ABSTRACT  

The Brown and Williamson Documents: Where Do We Go From Here?
Todd et al.
JAMA 1995;274:256-258.
ABSTRACT