This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

John D. Boice, Jr, ScD; Jack S. Mandel, PhD; Michele Morin Doody, MS

JAMA. 1995;274(5):394-401.

Abstract
Objective.
—To evaluate the risk of breast cancer among women occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation.

Design.
—Case-control study.

Participants.
—A health survey of 105 385 women radiologic technologists certified by the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists since 1926. Among 79016 respondents, 600 breast cancer cases were identified. Each of 528 eligible subjects with breast cancer was matched to five control subjects based on age, year of certification, and follow-up time.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Relative risk (RR) estimated as the relative odds ratio for breast cancer over categories of years worked as a radiologic technologist and according to personal and occupational exposure characteristics.

Results.
—Study subjects had been certified for a mean of 29 years; 63.8% of cases and 62.6% of controls worked as radiologic technologists for 10 years or more. Significant increased risks for breast cancer were associated with early age at menarche (for <11 years of age: RR=1.79; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 1.09 to 2.94), nulliparity (RR=1.36; 95% Cl, 1.04 to 1.78), first-degree relative with history of breast cancer (RR=2.07; 95% Cl, 1.56 to 2.74), prior breast biopsy (RR=1.53; 95% Cl, 1.17 to 2.00), alcohol consumption (for >14 alcoholic drinks per week: RR=2.12; 95% Cl, 1.06 to 4.27), thyroid cancer (RR=5.36; 95% Cl, 1.64 to 17.5), hyperthyroidism (RR=1.66; 95% Cl, 1.02 to 2.71), and residence in the northeastern United States (RR=1.66; 95% Cl, 1.19 to 2.30). Jobs involving radiotherapy, radioisotopes, or fluoroscopic equipment, however, were not linked to breast cancer risk, nor were personal exposures to fluoroscopy or multifilm procedures. Use of birth control pills, postmenopausal estrogens, or permanent hair dyes also were not risk factors. Based on dosimetry records for 35% of study subjects, cumulative exposures appeared low. Among women who worked more than 20 years, the RR for breast cancer was 1.13 (95% Cl, 0.79 to 1.64).

Conclusions.
—More than 50% of the reported breast cancers could be explained by established risk factors. Employment as a radiologic technologist, however, was not found to increase the risk of breast cancer. The contribution of prolonged exposure to relatively low doses of ionizing radiation to breast cancer risk was too small to be detectable at this time.

(JAMA. 1995;274:394-401)

Author Affiliations
From the Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md (Dr Boice and Ms Doody), and the Division of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Dr Mandel).

Footnotes
Corresponding author: John D. Boice, Jr, ScD, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Blvd, EPN/Room 408, Bethesda, MD 20892.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Screening Mammography in Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Systematic Review for the American College of Physicians
Armstrong et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;146:516-526.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Personal Use of Hair Dyes and Risk of Cancer: A Meta-analysis
Takkouche et al.
JAMA 2005;293:2516-2525.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast Cancer Mortality Among Female Radiologic Technologists in the United States
Mohan et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:943-948.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the 5' Untranslated Region of RAD51 and Risk of Cancer among BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers
Wang et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:955-960.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

First Analysis of Cancer Incidence and Occupational Radiation Exposure Based on the National Dose Registry of Canada
Sont et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2001;153:309-318.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Heterozygous Germline ATM Mutations Do Not Contribute to Radiation-Associated Malignancies After Hodgkin's Disease
Nichols et al.
JCO 1999;17:1259-1259.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast Cancer Among Radiologic Technologists
Swift et al.
JAMA 1996;276:369-369.
ABSTRACT  

Breast Cancer Among Radiologic Technologists-Reply
Boice et al.
JAMA 1996;276:369-370.
ABSTRACT