You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 274 No. 7, August 16, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Brief Report
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Community-Based Prevalence of Anal Incontinence

Richard Nelson, MD; Nancy Norton; Eleanor Cautley, MS; Sylvia Furner, PhD

JAMA. 1995;274(7):559-561.


Abstract

Objective.
—To determine the prevalence of and characteristics associated with anal incontinence in the general community.

Setting.
—Community survey.

Participants.
—The population of the state of Wisconsin sampled in the Wisconsin Family Health Survey. Subjects were identified by random digit dialing with telephone interview. The individual within each household identified as most knowledgeable about the health status of all other members of the household was asked about the health status of each member of the household. Approximately 200 households were surveyed each month.

Main Outcome Measures.
—The presence of anal incontinence to solid or liquid feces or gas, who suffered from it, the frequency of anal incontinence, and how the incontinent person coped with it.

Results.
—A total of 2570 households comprising 6959 individuals were surveyed, and 153 individuals were reported to have anal incontinence, representing 2.2% of the population (95% confidence interval [CI], ±0.3%). Thirty percent of the incontinent subjects were older than 65 years, and 63% were women. Of those with anal incontinence, 36% were incontinent to solid feces, 54% to liquid feces, and 60% to gas. In a multivariate analysis, independent associations of the following risk factors with anal incontinence were found: female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; CI, 1.1 to 2.1), age (continuously adjusted) (OR, 1.01; CI, 1.01 to 1.02), physical limitations (OR, 1.8; CI, 1.2 to 2.7), and poor general health (OR, 1.6; CI, 1.4 to 1.9).

Conclusions.
—Anal incontinence was reported in 2.2% of the general population. Independent risk factors for incontinence include female sex, advancing age, poor general health, and physical limitations.

(JAMA. 1995;274:559-561)



Author Affiliations

From the Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine (Dr Nelson), and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health (Drs Nelson and Furner), University of Illinois at Chicago; the International Foundation for Bowel Dysfunction, Milwaukee, Wis (Ms Norton); and the State of Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services, Madison (Ms Cautley).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to the Department of Surgery, University of Illinois Hospital, Room 2204, m/c 957, 1740 W Taylor St, Chicago, IL 60612 (Dr Nelson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Combined Anal Sphincteroplasty and Perineal Reconstruction for Fecal Incontinence in Women
Novi et al.
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 2009;109:234-236.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Experience of Community-Living Women Managing Fecal Incontinence
Peden-McAlpine et al.
West J Nurs Res 2008;30:817-835.
ABSTRACT  

Prevalence of Symptomatic Pelvic Floor Disorders in US Women
Nygaard et al.
JAMA 2008;300:1311-1316.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Increased work-load associated with faecal incontinence among home care patients in 11 European countries
Finne-Soveri et al.
Eur J Public Health 2008;18:323-328.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anal Sphincter Defects in Patients with Fecal Incontinence: Endoanal versus External Phased-Array MR Imaging
Terra et al.
Radiology 2005;236:886-895.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development of a three-dimensional physiological model of the internal anal sphincter bioengineered in vitro from isolated smooth muscle cells
Hecker et al.
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2005;289:G188-G196.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationship between symptoms and disordered continence mechanisms in women with idiopathic faecal incontinence
Bharucha et al.
Gut 2005;54:546-555.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Advances in the Surgical Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
Person and Wexner
SURG INNOV 2005;12:7-21.
ABSTRACT  

Risk Factors for Hospital-Acquired Incontinence in Elderly Female Hip Fracture Patients
Palmer et al.
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2002;57:M672-677.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Vitamin B12 Deficiency and Incontinence: Is There an Association?
Endo et al.
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2002;57:M583-587.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dietary fibre supplementation with psyllium or gum arabic reduced incontinent stools and improved stool consistency in community living adults
Campbell
Evid. Based Nurs. 2002;5:56-56.
FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of faecal incontinence in adults aged 40 years or more living in the community
Perry et al.
Gut 2002;50:480-484.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Author overestimated need in community population with faecal incontinence
Perry et al.
BMJ 1998;317:415-415.
FULL TEXT  

Fortnightly review : Faecal incontinence
Kamm
BMJ 1998;316:528-532.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Stroke and Incontinence
Brittain et al.
Stroke 1998;29:524-528.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.