You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 275 No. 11, March 20, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effect of Frequency of Prenatal Care Visits on Perinatal Outcome Among Low-Risk Women

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Robert S. McDuffie, Jr, MD; Arne Beck, PhD; Kimberly Bischoff, MSHA; Jean Cross, MHA; Miriam Orleans, PhD

JAMA. 1996;275(11):847-851.


Abstract

Objective.
—In 1989, the Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care established guidelines on the timing and content of prenatal care, including a schedule consisting of fewer prenatal visits than traditionally provided, for women at low risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. We tested the hypothesis that there are no significant increases in adverse perinatal outcomes when low-risk women are seen in a prenatal care visit schedule of fewer visits than routinely advised.

Design.
—Randomized controlled trial.

Setting.
—Group-model health maintenance organization.

Patients.
—A total of 2764 pregnant women, judged to be at low risk of adverse perinatal outcomes.

Interventions.
—Following risk assessment, participants were randomly assigned to an experimental schedule (nine visits) or a control schedule (14 visits) with additional visits as indicated or as desired by the patient.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Preterm delivery, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, low birth weight, and patients' satisfaction with care.

Results.
—On average, there were 2.7 fewer visits observed in the experimental group than in the control group. There were no significant increases in the main outcomes of the experimental group: preterm delivery (relative risk [RR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.27; P=.19), preeclampsia (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.14; P=.74), cesarean delivery (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.17; P=.25), and low birth weight (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.12; P=.76). There were no differences between the two groups in patients' satisfaction with quality of prenatal care.

Conclusion.
—In this study, good perinatal outcomes and patient satisfaction were maintained when the prenatal visit schedule proposed by the Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care was observed.

(JAMA. 1996;275:847-851)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr McDuffie) and Research and Development (Dr Beck and Mss Bischoff and Cross), Kaiser Permanente, Denver, Colo, and the Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics (Dr Orleans), University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente, 2045 Franklin St, Denver, CO 80205 (Dr McDuffie).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

What is the place of the new WHO antenatal care model in a teaching hospital setting?
Ekele et al.
Trop Doct 2008;38:21-24.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Global Satisfaction With Perinatal Hospital Care: Stability and Relationship to Anxiety, Depression, and Stressful Medical Events
Britton
American Journal of Medical Quality 2006;21:200-205.
ABSTRACT  

Effects of a Reduced-Visit Prenatal Care Clinical Practice Guideline
Partridge and Holman
J Am Board Fam Med 2005;18:555-560.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Community-Based Interventions for Improving Perinatal and Neonatal Health Outcomes in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence
Bhutta et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:519-617.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Timing and Magnitude of Increases in Levothyroxine Requirements during Pregnancy in Women with Hypothyroidism
Alexander et al.
NEJM 2004;351:241-249.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Meta-Analyses of Cluster Randomization Trials: Power Considerations
Donner et al.
Eval Health Prof 2003;26:340-351.
ABSTRACT  

Ethnicity and Prenatal Health Promotion Content
Vonderheid et al.
West J Nurs Res 2003;25:388-404.
ABSTRACT  

Predictive Value of Routine Circulating Soluble Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule Measurements during Pregnancy
Krauss et al.
Clin. Chem. 2002;48:1418-1425.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pregnancy in Women With Known HIV Infection: What Do We and Don't We Know?
Scarpinato
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:2543-2544.
ABSTRACT  

Authors' reply
Sikorski et al.
BMJ 1996;313:169-169.
FULL TEXT  

Frequency of Prenatal Care Visits and Perinatal Outcome
Zalar
JAMA 1996;276:101-101.
ABSTRACT  

FEWER PRENATAL CARE VISITS NEEDED FOR LOW-RISK WOMEN
JWatch General 1996;1996:6-6.
FULL TEXT  

Fewer Visits May Suffice in Low-Risk Pregnancies
JWatch Women's Health 1996;1996:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.