You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 275 No. 15, April 17, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cesarean Delivery in Relation to Birth Weight and Gestational Glucose Tolerance

Pathophysiology or Practice Style?

C. David Naylor, MD, DPhil; Mathew Sermer, MD; Erluo Chen, MB, MPH; Kathy Sykora, MSc; Toronto Trihospital Gestational Diabetes Investigators

JAMA. 1996;275(15):1165-1170.


Abstract

Objective.
—To examine the relationship between birth weight and mode of delivery among women with untreated borderline gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), treated overt GDM, and normoglycemia.

Design.
—Prospective cohort study

Setting.
—Three Toronto, Ontario, teaching hospitals.

Patients.
—A total of 3778 volunteers aged 24 years or older.

Interventions.
—Subjects underwent a 3-hour, 100-g oral glucose tolerance test at 28 weeks' gestation, regardless of screening test results. Usual care was provided to 143 women who met the National Diabetes Data Group criteria for GDM. Physicians were blinded to glucose test results for all others, including 115 untreated women with borderline GDM by the broader criteria of Carpenter and Coustan.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Crude and adjusted rates of cesarean delivery and neonatal macrosomia (birth weight >4000 g).

Results.
—Compared with normoglycemic controls, the untreated borderline GDM group had increased rates of macrosomia (28.7% vs 13.7%, P<.001) and cesarean delivery (29.6% vs 20.2%, P=.02). Cesarean delivery in this subgroup was associated with macrosomia (45.5% vs 23.5%, P=.03). Usual care of known GDM normalized birth weights, but the cesarean delivery rate was about 33% whether macrosomia was present or absent. A clearly increased risk of cesarean delivery among treated patients compared with normoglycemic controls persisted after adjustment for multiple maternal risk factors (adjusted odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.6).

Conclusions.
—Infant macrosomia was a mediating factor in high cesarean delivery rates for women with untreated borderline GDM. While detection and treatment of GDM normalized birth weights, rates of cesarean delivery remained inexplicably high. Recognition of GDM may lead to a lower threshold for surgical delivery that mitigates the potential benefits of treatment.

(JAMA. 1996;275:1165-1170)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Medicine (Dr Naylor), Surgery (Dr Naylor), Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr Sermer), and Clinical Epidemiology and Health Care Research Program, Sunnybrook Unit (Drs Naylor and Chen), University of Toronto (Ontario); and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Toronto) (Dr Naylor and Ms Sykora). A complete list of the Toronto Trihospital Gestational Diabetes Investigators appears at the end of the article.


Footnotes

Reprints: C. David Naylor, MD, DPhil, G-106, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, North York, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes
Landon et al.
NEJM 2009;361:1339-1348.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Counterpoint: Selective Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Berger and Sermer
Diabetes Care 2009;32:1352-1354.
FULL TEXT  

Many HAPO Returns: Maternal Glycemia and Neonatal Adiposity: New Insights from the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes (HAPO) Study
Lindsay
Diabetes 2009;58:302-303.
FULL TEXT  

Gestational diabetes: causes and consequences
Lindsay
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease 2009;9:27-31.
ABSTRACT  

Acanthosis Nigricans Among Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes
Daitchman et al.
Diabetes Care 2008;31:e30-e30.
FULL TEXT  

Maternal Obesity and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Chu et al.
Diabetes Care 2007;30:2070-2076.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Network Randomized Clinical Trial in Progress: Standard therapy versus no therapy for mild gestational diabetes
Landon et al.
Diabetes Care 2007;30:S194-S199.
FULL TEXT  

A Trial in Progress: Gestational Diabetes: Treatment with metformin compared with insulin (the Metformin in Gestational Diabetes [MiG] trial)
Rowan and on behalf of the MiG Investigators
Diabetes Care 2007;30:S214-S219.
FULL TEXT  

Missed Opportunities for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Screening Among Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Kim et al.
AJPH 2006;96:1643-1648.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus -- Time to Treat
Greene and Solomon
NEJM 2005;352:2544-2546.
FULL TEXT  

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes if Gestational Impaired Glucose Tolerance Is Not Treated
Ostlund et al.
Diabetes Care 2003;26:2107-2111.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Women With Impaired Glucose Tolerance During Pregnancy Have Significantly Poor Pregnancy Outcomes
Yang et al.
Diabetes Care 2002;25:1619-1624.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Detected by the National Diabetes Data Group or the Carpenter and Coustan Plasma Glucose Thresholds
Ferrara et al.
Diabetes Care 2002;25:1625-1630.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines and Recommendations for Laboratory Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetes Mellitus
Sacks et al.
Clin. Chem. 2002;48:436-472.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Jovanovic and Pettitt
JAMA 2001;286:2516-2518.
FULL TEXT  

The role of genetic susceptibility in the association of low birth weight with type 2 diabetes
Frayling and Hattersley
Br Med Bull 2001;60:89-101.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregestational and gestational diabetes mellitus, and the influence of maternal obesity and weight gain: the DEPOSIT study
Ray et al.
QJM 2001;94:347-356.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Kjos and Buchanan
NEJM 1999;341:1749-1756.
FULL TEXT  

Selective Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Naylor et al.
NEJM 1997;337:1591-1596.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should We Screen for Gestational Diabetes?
Clemenson
JAMA 1996;276:451-451.
ABSTRACT  

A LOWER THRESHOLD FOR C-SECTION WITH GESTATIONAL DIABETES?
JWatch General 1996;1996:5-5.
FULL TEXT  

Gestational Diabetes and C-Section: A Case of Expecting the Worst?
JWatch Women's Health 1996;1996:7-7.
FULL TEXT  

Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Self-fulfilling Prophecy?
Coustan
JAMA 1996;275:1199-1200.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.