You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 275 No. 18, May 8, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

The Ontario trial of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital and prehospital cardiac arrest

I. G. Stiell, P. C. Hebert, G. A. Wells, A. Laupacis, K. Vandemheen, J. F. Dreyer, M. A. Eisenhauer, J. Gibson, L. A. Higginson, A. S. Kirby, J. L. Mahon, J. P. Maloney and B. N. Weitzman
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVE--To compare the impact of active compression-decompression (ACD) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and standard CPR on the outcomes of in-hospital and prehospital victims of cardiac arrest. DESIGN--Randomized controlled trial with blinding of allocation using a sealed container. SETTINGS--(1) Emergency departments, wards, and intensive care units of 5 university hospitals and (2) all locations outside hospitals in 2 midsized cities. PATIENTS--A total of 1784 adults who had cardiac arrest. INTERVENTION--Patients received either standard or ACD CPR throughout resuscitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Survival for 1 hour and to hospital discharge and the modified Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). RESULTS--All characteristics were similar in the standard and ACD CPR groups for the 773 in-hospital patients and the 1011 prehospital patients. For in-hospital patients, there were no significant differences between the standard (n = 368) and ACD (n = 405) CPR groups in survival for 1 hour (35.1% vs 34.6%; P = .89), in survival until hospital discharge (11.4% vs 10.4%; P = .64), or in the median MMSE score of survivors (37 in both groups). For patients who collapsed outside the hospital, there were also no significant differences between the standard (n = 510) and ACD (n = 501) CPR groups in survival for 1 hour (16.5% vs 18.2%; P = .48), in survival to hospital discharge (3.7% vs 4.6%; P = .49), or in the median MMSE score of survivors (35 in both groups). Exploration of clinically important subgroups failed to identify any patients who appeared to benefit from ACD CPR. CONCLUSIONS--ACD CPR did not improve survival or neurologic outcomes in any group of patients with cardiac arrest.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Acute management of sudden cardiac death in adults based upon the new CPR guidelines
Yannopoulos and Aufderheide
Europace 2007;9:2-9.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Part 6: CPR Techniques and Devices
Circulation 2005;112:IV-47-IV-50.
FULL TEXT  

A 2-Tiered Approach to In-Hospital Defibrillation: Nurses Respond to a Trial of Using Automated External Defibrillators as Part of a Code-Team Protocol
Kyller and Johnstone
Crit Care Nurse 2005;25:25-33.
FULL TEXT  

Validation of a Clinical Decision Aid to Discontinue In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitations
van Walraven et al.
JAMA 2001;285:1602-1606.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

New Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiac Care: Changes in the Management of Cardiac Arrest
Kern et al.
JAMA 2001;285:1267-1269.
FULL TEXT  

Emergency cardiac care: introduction
Ewy and Ornato
J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:825-880.
FULL TEXT  

CPR Techniques That Combine Chest and Abdominal Compression and Decompression : Hemodynamic Insights From a Spreadsheet Model
Babbs
Circulation 1999;100:2146-2152.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Active Compression-Decompression Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Plaisance et al.
NEJM 1999;341:569-575.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Survival After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
de Vos et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:249-254.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do We Need a Clinical Decision Rule for the Discontinuation of Cardiac Arrest Resuscitations?
Sanders
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:119-121.
FULL TEXT  

Derivation of a Clinical Decision Rule for the Discontinuation of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitations
van Walraven et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:129-134.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The 1998 European Resuscitation Council guidelines for adult advanced life support
Advanced Life Support Working Group of the Europea
BMJ 1998;316:1863-1869.
FULL TEXT  

Similar Outcomes for Standard and ACD CPR
Journal Watch Cardiology 1996;1996:3-3.
FULL TEXT  

DISAPPOINTING DATA ON ACTIVE COMPRESSION-DECOMPRESSION CPR
JWatch General 1996;1996:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.