You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 275 No. 22, June 12, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Brief Reports
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Nonfatal and Fatal Firearm Injuries in a Rural County

Laura S. Sadowski, MD, MPH; Sergio R. Muñoz, PhD

JAMA. 1996;275(22):1762-1764.


Abstract

Objective.
—To measure the incidence of fatal and nonfatal firearm injuries in a rural setting.

Design.
—A prospective, population-based surveillance system using information from medical and legal records, newspapers, and members of the community.

Setting.
—A rural county in North Carolina.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Incidence rates and case-fatality ratios (fatal:nonfatal).

Results.
—Of the 114 firearm injuries detected by the surveillance system from January 1,1990, through December 31,1991, nearly two thirds were nonfatal. The overall age-adjusted annual incidence of firearm injuries was 66.4 per 100000 population, and the incidence of nonfatal firearm injuries was 41.2 per 100000 population. Subgroup annual incidence rates were greatest for African Americans. The overall case-fatality ratio was 1:1.8 (fatal:nonfatal).

Conclusions.
—Incidence rates and case-fatality ratios for firearm injury in this rural setting were greater than expected, based on national estimates, perhaps because of greater proportions of rifle injuries and self-inflicted injuries.

(JAMA. 1996;275:1762-1764)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dr Sadowski), and the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, School of Medicine, Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile (Dr Muñoz).


Footnotes

Reprints: Laura S. Sadowski, MD, MPH, Department of Medicine, CB 7110, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7110.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Urban-Rural Shifts in Intentional Firearm Death: Different Causes, Same Results
Branas et al.
AJPH 2004;94:1750-1755.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Attitudes of New York City High School Students Regarding Firearm Violence
Kahn et al.
Pediatrics 2001;107:1125-1132.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Firearm-Related Injuries Affecting the Pediatric Population
Committee on Injury and Poison Prevention
Pediatrics 2000;105:888-895.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Injuries Due to Firearms in Three Cities
Kellermann et al.
NEJM 1996;335:1438-1444.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Strategic Thinking About Gun Markets and Violence
Cook and Cole
JAMA 1996;275:1765-1767.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.