You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 275 No. 4, January 24, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Pregnancy Termination in Relation to Risk of Breast Cancer

Polly A. Newcomb, PhD; Barry E. Storer, PhD; Matthew P. Longnecker, MD; Robert Mittendorf, MD; E. Robert Greenberg, MD; Walter C. Willett, MD

JAMA. 1996;275(4):283-287.


Abstract

Objective.
—To evaluate the association between pregnancy terminations and risk of breast cancer.

Design and Setting.
—Population-based case-control study in Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Maine, and New Hampshire.

Study Participants.
—Cases were women younger than 75 years with a new diagnosis of breast cancer (n=6888), identified from statewide tumor registries. Controls younger than 65 years (n=9529) were randomly selected from lists of licensed drivers, or for older subjects, from lists of Medicare beneficiaries. Exposures and Outcomes.—Breast cancer risk in relation to spontaneous or induced abortions.

Results.
—After adjustment for parity, age at first birth, and other risk factors, pregnancy termination (induced or spontaneous) was associated with a relative risk (RR) of breast cancer of 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.21), compared with the risk among women who had never had a termination. Induced terminations were associated with a RR of 1.23 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.51), which was somewhat greater than the risk associated with spontaneous terminations (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.20). The association with induced abortions was stronger for those performed before legalization of abortion in 1973 (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.80) than after this time (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.49), suggesting a bias in reporting this sensitive procedure.

Conclusions.
—A weak positive association was observed between abortion— whether induced or spontaneous—and risk of breast cancer. The increase in risk of breast cancer was somewhat greater among women with a history of induced terminations. However, this association may be due to reporting bias and was not significantly different than the slight risk for spontaneous terminations.

(JAMA. 1996;275:283-287)



Author Affiliations

From the University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Wash (Drs Newcomb and Storer); Department of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, Calif (Dr Longnecker); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago (Ill), Chicago Lying-In Hospital (Dr Mittendorf); Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical School, Hanover, NH (Dr Greenberg); and Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Channing Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (Dr Willett). Dr Longnecker is now at the Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC.


Footnotes

Presented in part at the 28th annual meeting of the Society for Epidemiologic Research, Snowbird, Utah, June 22, 1995.

Reprint requests to University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Room 4780, Medical Science Center, 1300 University Ave, Madison, WI 53706 (Dr Newcomb).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Risk of breast cancer after miscarriage or induced abortion: a Scottish record linkage case-control study
Brewster et al.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2005;59:283-287.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ductal Lavage and Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer
Arun
The Oncologist 2004;9:599-605.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Selection Bias in the Assessment of Gene-Environment Interaction in Case-Control Studies
Morimoto et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:259-263.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Induced Abortion, Miscarriage, and Breast Cancer Risk of Young Women
Mahue-Giangreco et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:209-214.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tamoxifen, Raloxifene, and the Prevention of Breast Cancer
Jordan and Morrow
Endocr. Rev. 1999;20:253-278.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

JAMA, Abortion, and Editorial Responsibility
Lundberg
JAMA 1998;280:740-740.
FULL TEXT  

Bibliography
Current Sociology 1998;46:128-144.
 

Induced Abortion and the Risk of Breast Cancer
Melbye et al.
NEJM 1997;336:81-85.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Abortion, Breast Cancer, and Epidemiology
Hartge
NEJM 1997;336:127-128.
FULL TEXT  

Pregnancy Termination and Risk of Breast Cancer
Henshaw
JAMA 1996;276:31-31.
ABSTRACT  

Pregnancy Termination and Risk of Breast Cancer
Lehrer
JAMA 1996;276:31-31.
ABSTRACT  

Abortion and the Risk of Breast Cancer: Is There a Believable Association?
Gammon et al.
JAMA 1996;275:321-322.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.