You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 275 No. 8, February 28, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prospective Validation of a Decision Rule for the Use of Radiography in Acute Knee Injuries

Ian G. Stiell, MD, MSc, FRCPC; Gary H. Greenberg, MD, FRCPC; George A. Wells, PhD; Ian McDowell, PhD; A. Adam Cwinn, MD, FRCPC; Norman A. Smith, MD, FRCPC; Teresa F. Cacciotti, RN; Marco L. A. Sivilotti, MD, MSc, FRCPC

JAMA. 1996;275(8):611-615.


Abstract

Objective.
—To validate a previously derived decision rule for the use of radiography in patients with acute knee injury.

Design.
—Prospectively administered survey.

Setting.
—Emergency departments of two university hospitals serving adults.

Patients.
—Convenience sample of 1096 of 1251 eligible adults with acute knee injuries; 124 patients were examined by two physicians.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Attending emergency physicians assessed each patient for standardized clinical variables and determined the need for radiography according to the decision rule. Patients who did not have radiography underwent a structured telephone interview at day 14 to determine the possibility of a fracture. The rule was assessed for ability to correctly identify the criterion standard, fracture of the knee. An attempt was made to refine the rule by means of univariate and recursive partitioning analyses.

Results.
—The decision rule had a sensitivity of 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 1.0) for identifying 63 clinically important fractures. Physicians correctly interpreted the rule in 96% of cases, and the {kappa} value for interpretation was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.89). The potential relative reduction in use of radiography was estimated to be 28%. The probability of fracture, if the decision rule were "negative," is estimated to be 0% (95% CI, 0% to 0.4%). Attempts to refine the rule led to a model with improved specificity but with an unacceptable loss of sensitivity.

Conclusion.
—Prospective validation has shown this decision rule to be 100% sensitive for identifying fractures of the knee, to be reliable and acceptable, and to have the potential to allow physicians to reduce the use of radiography in patients with acute knee injury.

(JAMA. 1996;275:611-615)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Emergency Medicine (Drs Stiell, Greenberg, Cwinn, Smith, and Sivilotti), the Departments of Epidemiology and Community Medicine (Drs Stiell, Wells, and McDowell) and Medicine (Drs Stiell and Wells), and the Clinical Epidemiology Unit (Drs Stiell and Wells and Ms Cacciotti), University of Ottawa (Ontario) Faculty of Medicine. Dr Stiell is an MRC scientist with the Medical Research Council of Canada Research Personnel Program.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Loeb Medical Research Institute, Ottawa Civic Hospital, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4E9 (Dr Stiell).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial
Stiell et al.
BMJ 2009;339:b4146-b4146.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Can the Ottawa knee rule be applied to children? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Vijayasankar et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2009;26:250-253.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The painful knee: Choosing thea right imaging test
KOPLAS et al.
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2008;75:377-384.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Ambulatory Prescribing Safety with a Handheld Decision Support System: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Berner et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2006;13:171-179.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development and Application of Clinical Prediction Rules to Improve Decision Making in Physical Therapist Practice
Childs and Cleland
ptjournal 2006;86:122-131.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in Patients With Minor Head Injury
Stiell et al.
JAMA 2005;294:1511-1518.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Prediction Rules in Trauma Imaging: Who, How, and Why?
Blackmore
Radiology 2005;235:371-374.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

9 Assessment and care of musculoskeletal problems
FitzSimmons and Wardrope
Emerg. Med. J. 2005;22:68-76.
FULL TEXT  

Observational Studies in Radiology
Blackmore and Cummings
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2004;183:1203-1208.
FULL TEXT  

Review: the Ottawa knee rule accurately rules out knee fractures and can substantially reduce the need for x rays in patients with acute knee injuries
Lang
Evid. Based Med. 2004;9:151-151.
FULL TEXT  

The Accuracy of the Ottawa Knee Rule To Rule Out Knee Fractures: A Systematic Review
Bachmann et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:121-124.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Presentation, examination, investigation and early treatment of acute knee injuries
Hunt and Greaves
Trauma 2004;6:53-66.
ABSTRACT  

The Ottawa Knee Rules accurately identified fractures in children with knee injuries
Robertson
Evid. Based Nurs. 2004;7:24-24.
FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Acute Knee Pain in Primary Care
Jackson et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:575-588.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of soft tissue knee injuries in an accident and emergency department: the effect of the introduction of a physiotherapy practitioner
Jibuike et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2003;20:37-39.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Canadian C-Spine Rule for Radiography in Alert and Stable Trauma Patients
Stiell et al.
JAMA 2001;286:1841-1848.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Disease Prediction Models Aim To Guide Medical Decision Making
Reynolds
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:637-640.
FULL TEXT  

Rate of Abnormal Osteoarticular Radiographic Findings in Pediatric Patients
Petit et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;176:987-990.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical decision rules in the emergency department
Stiell
CMAJ 2000;163:1465-1466.
FULL TEXT  

Validation of an instrument for injury data collection in rugby union
McManus
Br. J. Sports. Med. 2000;34:342-347.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An introduction to statistical inference--3
Driscoll et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2000;17:357-363.
FULL TEXT  

Who is at Low Risk after Head or Neck Trauma?
Marx and Biros
NEJM 2000;343:138-140.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Decision Rule to Identify Febrile Young Girls at Risk for Urinary Tract Infection
Gorelick and Shaw
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:386-390.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Implementation of the Ottawa Knee Rule for the Use of Radiography in Acute Knee Injuries
Stiell et al.
JAMA 1997;278:2075-2079.
ABSTRACT  

Translating Good Advice Into Better Practice
Lee and Cooper
JAMA 1997;278:2108-2109.
ABSTRACT  

Current Concepts Review - Decision Analysis
BERNSTEIN
JBJS 1997;79:1404-14.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Prediction Rules: A Review and Suggested Modifications of Methodological Standards
Laupacis et al.
JAMA 1997;277:488-494.
ABSTRACT  

Emergency Medicine
Tintinalli
JAMA 1996;275:1804-1805.
ABSTRACT  

RADIOGRAPHY DECISION RULE DETECTS ACUTE KNEE INJURIES
JWatch General 1996;1996:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical Prediction Rules: Have They Come of Age?
Wasson and Sox
JAMA 1996;275:641-642.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.