This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (75)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The Enduring Policy Issues

Rebecca Dresser, JD

JAMA. 1996;276(1):67-72.

Abstract
Mentally disabled adults often serve as subjects in research on mental illness, developmental disabilities, dementia, and other conditions associated with mental impairment. Since US regulatory policy fails to resolve many ethical issues presented by such research, investigators and institutional review boards must determine the appropriate standards and procedures for studies involving adults with mental disabilities. Procedures for capacity assessment and information disclosure should enhance the autonomy of capable subjects and accurately identify subjects incapable of independent choice. Research teams should inform proxy decision makers of their ethical responsibilities. Decisionally incapable adults objecting to research involvement should rarely be included in studies. Researchers, institutional review boards, advocacy groups, and federal officials should collaborate to improve evaluation of risks and potential benefits to decisionally incapable subjects. These groups should also seek consensus on appropriate risk limits in studies presenting no prospect of direct benefit to decisionally incapable subjects. Finally, subject populations should be represented in research planning and review activities.

Author Affiliations
From the School of Law and the Center for Biomedical Ethics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Footnotes
Reprints: Rebecca Dresser, JD, School of Law, Case Western Reserve University, 11075 East Blvd, Cleveland, OH 44106.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

An Inverse Relationship Between Perceived Harm and Participation Willingness in Schizophrenia Research Protocols
Roberts et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2006;163:2002-2004.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Meta-Consent in Research on Decisional Capacity: A "Catch-22"?
Saks et al.
Schizophr Bull 2006;32:42-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Financial Capacity in Persons with Schizophrenia and Serious Mental Illness: Clinical and Research Ethics Aspects
Marson et al.
Schizophr Bull 2006;32:81-91.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do Research Procedures Pose Relatively Greater Risk for Healthy Persons Than for Persons With Schizophrenia?
Roberts et al.
Schizophr Bull 2006;32:153-158.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Views of People With Schizophrenia Regarding Aspects of Research: Study Size and Funding Sources
Roberts et al.
Schizophr Bull 2006;32:107-115.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Consensus and Controversy in Clinical Research Ethics
Brody et al.
JAMA 2005;294:1411-1414.
FULL TEXT  

Ethical and Regulatory Considerations in Educational Research
Weiss Roberts et al.
Acad. Psychiatry 2005;29:1-5.
FULL TEXT  

Influence of Ethical Safeguards on Research Participation: Comparison of Perspectives of People With Schizophrenia and Psychiatrists
Roberts et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2004;161:2309-2311.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Can We Ensure That All Research Subjects Give Valid Consent?
Wendler
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2201-2204.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are the rules for research with subjects with dementia changing?: Views from the field
Stocking et al.
Neurology 2003;61:1649-1651.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Informed Consent and the Capacity for Voluntarism
Roberts
Focus 2003;1:407-414.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Competence to Consent to Research Among Long-Stay Inpatients With Chronic Schizophrenia
Kovnick et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2003;54:1247-1252.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Informed Consent and the Capacity for Voluntarism
Roberts
Am. J. Psychiatry 2002;159:705-712.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Views of Potential Subjects Toward Proposed Regulations for Clinical Research With Adults Unable to Consent
Wendler et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2002;159:585-591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Core Safeguards for Clinical Research with Adults Who Are Unable To Consent
Wendler and Prasad
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:514-523.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What Makes Clinical Research Ethical?
Emanuel et al.
JAMA 2000;283:2701-2711.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perspectives of Patients With Schizophrenia and Psychiatrists Regarding Ethically Important Aspects of Research Participation
Roberts et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2000;157:67-74.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Drawing New Maps: A Radical Cartography of Developmental Disabilities
Smith
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 1999;69:117-144.
ABSTRACT  

Ethical Challenges in Stroke Research
Slyter
Stroke 1998;29:1725-1729.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Use of Multimedia in the Informed Consent Process
Jimison et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1998;5:245-256.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Use of Multimedia in the Informed Consent Process
Jimison et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998;5:245-256.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Call of the Sirens: Navigating the Ethics of Medication-Free Research in Schizophrenia
Fins and Miller
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997;54:415-416.
ABSTRACT  

Research With Cognitively Impaired Subjects: Unfinished Business in the Regulation of Human Research
Bonnie
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997;54:105-111.
ABSTRACT  

Ethics of Proxy Consent for Research Involving Patients With Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome-Reply
Hirschl et al.
JAMA 1996;276:949-950.
ABSTRACT