You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 276 No. 12, September 25, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (40)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cost-effectiveness of Incorporating Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Into the Routine Childhood Immunization Schedule

Mark A. Miller, MD; Roland W. Sutter, MD, MPH&TM; Peter M. Strebel, MBChB, MPH; Stephen C. Hadler, MD

JAMA. 1996;276(12):967-971.


Abstract

Objective.
—To evaluate the economic consequences of introducing inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) into the routine vaccination schedule in the United States to reduce vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP).

Design.
—Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness models were formulated to compare the current national 4-dose live attenuated oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) schedule with a 4-dose IPV schedule or a sequential schedule of 2 doses of IPV followed by 2 doses of OPV. Model assumptions were derived from the National Health Interview Survey (1994), current prices for OPV and IPV, a Delphi panel, compensatory awards by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and published and unpublished reports.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Annual societal incremental cost relative to the current schedule for the cost-benefit model; cost per VAPP case prevented for the cost-effectiveness model.

Results.
—Changing to an IPV-only or a sequential schedule would cost $28.1 million and $14.7 million, respectively. The costs per case of VAPP prevented were estimated as $3.0 million and $3.1 million for each option, respectively. Outcomes were most sensitive to the number of additional visits that may occur to avoid multiple injections.

Conclusions.
—The introduction of IPV into the routine vaccination schedule would not be cost-beneficial at current vaccine prices and with the current compensation awards paid to VAPP cases. The analysis provides a range of costs that policymakers need to consider if they wish to prevent VAPP. Although these costs are higher than those of other public health prevention programs, they may be justified because VAPP continues to occur as a result of government-mandated vaccination policies in the absence of known wild poliovirus transmission in the United States.



Author Affiliations

From the Epidemiology and Surveillance Division, National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.


Footnotes

Reprints: Roland W. Sutter, MD, MPH&TM, National Immunization Program (E05), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Risks, Costs, and Benefits of Possible Future Global Policies for Managing Polioviruses
Thompson et al.
AJPH 2008;98:1322-1330.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Economic Evaluation of the 7-Vaccine Routine Childhood Immunization Schedule in the United States, 2001
Zhou et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:1136-1144.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Defending against Bioterrorism: A Comparison of Vaccination and Antibiotic Prophylaxis against Anthrax
Fowler et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:601-610.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethics and Immunization Policy: Promoting Dialogue to Sustain Consensus
Feudtner and Marcuse
Pediatrics 2001;107:1158-1164.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Projected Cost-effectiveness of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccination of Healthy Infants and Young Children
Lieu et al.
JAMA 2000;283:1460-1468.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical and Economic Impact of a Combination Haemophilus influenzae and Hepatitis B Vaccine: Estimating Cost-effectiveness Using Decision Analysis
Fendrick et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:126-136.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing Quality of Care via HEDIS 3.0: Is There a Better Way?
Mainous III and Talbert
Arch Fam Med 1998;7:410-413.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Polio vaccine: is it time for a change? • Commentary
Finn et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 1998;78:571-574.
FULL TEXT  

Mensi and Pregliasco
CVI 1998;5:278-280.
FULL TEXT  

Vapocoolant Spray Is Equally Effective as EMLA Cream in Reducing Immunization Pain in School-aged Children
Cohen Reis and Holubkov
Pediatrics 1997;100:e5-e5.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Paralytic Poliomyelitis--United States, 1980-1994
JAMA 1997;277:525-526.
ABSTRACT  

Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine and Vaccine-Associated Paralytic Poliomyelitis
Brown
JAMA 1997;277:295-295.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.