You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 276 No. 12, September 25, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communication
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Domestic Production vs International Immigration

Options for the US Physician Workforce

David A. Kindig, MD, PhD; Donald L. Libby, PhD

JAMA. 1996;276(12):978-982.


Abstract

Objective.
—To determine alternate combinations for reductions in US medical school graduates (USMGs), international medical graduate (IMG) immigration, and graduate medical education (GME) residencies, based on future physician supply targets.

Design.
—A demographic projection model of the physician supply was constructed and calibrated to fit observed American Medical Association Physician Masterfile data and current supply forecasts. Total annual input to GME was backcast from given future supply targets, adjusting for the portion of IMGs in GME who do not enter the US workforce.

Main Outcome Measures.
—The annual number of new physicians added to supply from domestic or international sources needed to reach future physician-to-population ratio targets.

Results.
—Because of the low rate of attrition from the physician supply, it takes up to 50 years for workforce policy to effectively stabilize the physician-to-population ratio at a target level. All target ratios considered here would require immediate reductions in the total number of GME positions. These reductions must be followed by gradual annual increases to account for population growth. The size of USMG and IMG reductions are interrelated and depend critically on the percentage of IMG trainees who remain to practice in the United States.

Conclusions.
—Reductions in future physician supply can come from either the IMG or USMG component of physician production, or both. The model developed here allows the estimation of multiple combinations of both GME components.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison.


Footnotes

Reprints: David A. Kindig, MD, PhD, University of Wisconsin Medical School, 227 Bradley Memorial Hospital, 1300 University Ave, Madison, Wl 53706-1532.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The international medical graduate pipeline: recent trends in certification and residency training.
Boulet et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:469-477.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Projecting, Predicting, Shaping: The Challenge of Workforce Models
Berkowitz
Pediatrics 2004;113:918-919.
FULL TEXT  

How Can We Tell Whether There Are Too Many or Too Few Physicians? The Case for Benchmarking
Schroeder
JAMA 1996;276:1841-1843.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.