The effect of managed care on ICU length of stay: implications for medicare

D. C. Angus, W. T. Linde-Zwirble, C. A. Sirio, A. J. Rotondi, L. Chelluri, R. C. Newbold 3rd, J. R. Lave and M. R. Pinsky
Health Delivery and Systems Evaluation Team, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2582, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether insurance status (managed care vs traditional commercial and Medicare) influences resource consumption (as measured by length of stay [LOS]) in the intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the 1992 Massachusetts state hospital discharge database, using prospectively developed and validated risk-stratification models. SETTING: All nonfederal hospitals in Massachusetts. SUBJECTS: Of all adult hospitalizations where an ICU stay was incurred (n=104270), we selected those covered by 1 of 4 payer groups (n=88050): (1) commercial fee-for-service (patients aged <65 years); (2) commercial managed care (patients aged <65 years); (3) traditional Medicare (patients aged >/=65 years); and (4) Medicare-sponsored managed care (patients aged >/=65 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean ICU LOS. ANALYSIS: The ICU LOS regression models were constructed using split-halves validation to adjust for differences in age, sex, severity of illness, diagnosis, discharge status, and payer. Separate models were constructed for those younger than 65 years and those aged 65 years or older. Robustness of the models was explored using goodness of fit and correlation. The effect of payer on hospital mortality was also explored using logistic regression. Observed minus predicted mean ICU LOS and mortality rates were correlated with managed care penetration at the hospital level. RESULTS: The ICU LOS models performed well (R2=0.84 and R2L [likelihood ratio statistic]=0.92 for the development set, and R2=0.83 and R2L=0.89 for the validation set). Significant covariables affecting LOS included age, severity of principal illness, comorbidity, reason for admission, and discharge status (P<.001 for each). Among the cohort younger than 65 years (n=27805), although unadjusted mean ICU LOS was shorter (2.9 vs 3.43 days; P<.05) for those covered by managed care organizations, payer status had no independent effect on ICU LOS (P=.48). Among those older than 65 years, there was neither a difference in unadjusted ICU LOS (3.94 vs 3.88 days; P>/=.05) nor an independent effect of payer on ICU LOS (P=.35). Unadjusted mortality was lower among managed care patients (3.9% vs 5.1% in patients aged <65 years [P<.05] and 8.7% vs 12.1% in patients aged > or = 65 years [P<.05]). Age, severity of principal diagnosis, comorbidity, and reason for admission significantly influenced mortality (P<.001). After controlling for these factors with the mortality model (R2L=0.92 and 0.89, C statistic [12 df]=8.45 and 17.58, and P=.75 and .13 [where a large P reflects good agreement] for the development and validation sets, respectively), payer continued to have a small but significant effect on mortality (odds ratios ranging from 1.67 at 0.1% probability of death to 1.11 at 30% probability of death.) Managed care penetration among the commercially insured varied across hospitals (n=82) from 0% to 68%. There was no correlation between managed care penetration and either ICU LOS (R2=0.04; P=.09) or mortality (R2=0.0; P=.88). CONCLUSIONS: Though patients covered under managed care consume fewer ICU resources, this appears to be primarily attributable to a difference in patient-related factors. Thus, as managed care case mix changes in the future to include sicker and older patients, the initial advantages of reduced resource consumption may diminish.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Understanding and Enhancing the Value of Hospital Discharge Data
Schoenman et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2007;64:449-468.
ABSTRACT  

Physician-attributable Differences in Intensive Care Unit Costs: A Single-Center Study
Garland et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006;174:1206-1210.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving the ICU: Part 1
Garland
Chest 2005;127:2151-2164.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Critical Care Use during the Course of Serious Illness
Iwashyna
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2004;170:981-986.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Can Health Care Costs Be Reduced by Limiting Intensive Care at the End of Life?
LUCE and RUBENFELD
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002;165:750-754.
FULL TEXT  

Current and Projected Workforce Requirements for Care of the Critically Ill and Patients With Pulmonary Disease: Can We Meet the Requirements of an Aging Population?
Angus et al.
JAMA 2000;284:2762-2770.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Volume-Outcome Relationships in Pediatric Intensive Care Units
Tilford et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:289-294.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospital Utilization among Chronic Dialysis Patients
ARORA et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2000;11:740-746.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Analytic Reviews : Impact of Intensivists and ICU Teams on Patient Outcomes: Hanson CW, Aranda M Impact of intensivists and ICU teams on patient outcomes J Intensive Care Med 1999,14 254-261
Hanson and Aranda
J Intensive Care Med 1999;14:254-261.
 

Outcomes Research in Critical Care . Results of the American Thoracic Society Critical Care Assembly Workshop on Outcomes Research
RUBENFELD et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999;160:358-367.
FULL TEXT  

Organizational Characteristics of Intensive Care Units Related to Outcomes of Abdominal Aortic Surgery
Pronovost et al.
JAMA 1999;281:1310-1317.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Caring for the Critically Ill Patient: Past, Present, and Future
Cook
JAMA 1998;280:181-182.
FULL TEXT  

Use of Intensive Care Units for Patients With Low Severity of Illness
Rosenthal et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1144-1151.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT