You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 276 No. 18, November 13, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (146)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Effectiveness and Costs of Elective Cesarean Delivery for Fetal Macrosomia Diagnosed by Ultrasound

Dwight J. Rouse, MD; John Owen, MD; Robert L. Goldenberg, MD; Suzanne P. Cliver

JAMA. 1996;276(18):1480-1486.


Abstract

Objective.
—To quantitate the potential effectiveness and monetary costs of a policy of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound.

Design.
—A decision analytic model was constructed to compare 3 policies: (1) management without ultrasound; (2) ultrasound and elective cesarean delivery for estimated fetal weight of 4000 g or more (4000-g policy); and (3) ultrasound and elective cesarean delivery for estimated fetal weight of 4500 g or more (4500-g policy). The impact of maternal diabetes was analyzed separately. Probability data used in the decision analytic model were summarized from the literature and supplemented with unpublished data from the Collaborative Trial of Preterm Birth Prevention. Costs were estimated from the literature, regional reimbursements, and clinical practice data.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Rates of shoulder dystocia and permanent brachial plexus injury, and both the number of additional cesarean births and monetary costs per permanent brachial plexus injury averted.

Results.
—In the baseline analysis for nondiabetic women, the ultrasound policies increased both the cesarean delivery rate and costs, while decreasing the rate of shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injury. For each permanent brachial plexus injury prevented by the 4500-g policy, 3695 cesarean deliveries were performed at an additional cost of $8.7 million, vs 2345 cesarean deliveries and $4.9 million with the 4000-g policy. In the baseline analysis for diabetic women, with all 3 policies, rates of cesarean delivery, shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injury, and total costs were higher than for nondiabetic women. However, more favorable ratios for both cesarean deliveries and cost per permanent injury avoided were observed: 443 deliveries and $930 000, respectively, with the 4500-g policy, and 489 deliveries and $880 000, respectively, with the 4000-g policy. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the general robustness of these findings.

Conclusions.
—For the 97% of pregnant women who are not diabetic, a policy of elective cesarean delivery for ultrasonographically diagnosed fetal macrosomia is medically and economically unsound. In pregnancies complicated by diabetes, such a policy appears to be more tenable, although the merits of such an approach are debatable.



Author Affiliations

From The Center for Obstetric Research, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham.


Footnotes

Reprints: Dwight J. Rouse, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 618 S 20th St, 457 OHB, Birmingham, AL 35233-7333 (e-mail: dwrouse@aol.com).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Brachial Plexus Injury in the Newborn
Sutcliffe
NeoReviews 2007;8:e239-e246.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cesarean Delivery and the Risk-Benefit Calculus
Ecker and Frigoletto
NEJM 2007;356:885-888.
FULL TEXT  

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus -- Time to Treat
Greene and Solomon
NEJM 2005;352:2544-2546.
FULL TEXT  

Changes in spinal cord architecture after brachial plexus injury in the newborn
Korak et al.
Brain 2004;127:1488-1495.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diabetes Issues in Women and Children: Polycystic ovary syndrome
Bloomgarden
Diabetes Care 2003;26:2457-2463.
FULL TEXT  

The Argument Against C-Section on Demand
JWatch Women's Health 2003;2003:6-6.
FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Glyburide and Insulin in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Langer et al.
NEJM 2000;343:1134-1138.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

C-SECTIONS FOR BIG BABIES?
JWatch General 1996;1996:7-7.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.