You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 276 No. 2, July 10, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communications
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cost-effectiveness of Short-Course Zidovudine to Prevent Perinatal HIV Type 1 Infection in a Sub-Saharan African Developing Country Setting

Gordon Mansergh, MA, MEd; Anne C. Haddix, PhD; Richard W. Steketee, MD, MPH; Phillip I. Nieburg, MD, MPH; Dale J. Hu, MD, MPH; R. J. Simonds, MD; Martha Rogers, MD

JAMA. 1996;276(2):139-145.


Abstract

Objective.
—To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a short-course zidovudine program to prevent perinatal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 in sub-Saharan African country settings.

Design and Setting.
—Several clinical trials of short-course zidovudine during pregnancy for prevention of perinatal transmission of HIV are under way in developing countries in sub-Saharan Africa. A decision model was used to examine the cost-effectiveness of zidovudine programs in a hypothetical 1-year birth cohort in a sub-Saharan African setting from the perspective of the health care system and of society. A completed short course of zidovudine was assumed to reduce perinatal HIV transmission from 25% to 16.5%, approximately one half of the effect of the longer-course zidovudine. Estimates of program costs, lifetime HIV-related health care costs, and lost productivity costs were derived from the published literature and from preliminary data available from sites of planned clinical trials. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on all relevant parameters.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Medical costs, lost productivity costs, program costs, cost savings, and incremental cost-effectiveness, expressed as cost per infant HIV infection prevented.

Results.
—The model estimated that a national zidovudine program in a setting with 12.5% HIV seroprevalence would reduce perinatal HIV incidence by 12% (4.9 infections per 1000 births). The cost to the health care system would be $3748 per infant HIV infection prevented. When productivity losses were included in the model, the cost decreases to $1115 per infant HIV infection prevented. The cost to implement a national zidovudine program including the cost of counseling, testing, and drugs, would be $2 million per 100 000 births or $20 per pregnant woman. In the base case, decreases in the cost of counseling and testing and increases in maternal HIV prevalence, zidovudine efficacy, and medical and lost productivity costs improved cost-effectiveness of the zidovudine program.

Conclusions.
—Assuming demonstrable efficacy of short-course zidovudine prevention of perinatal HIV, a national perinatal HIV prevention program with zidovudine in most sub-Saharan African country settings would reduce the incidence of infant HIV infection and, in some settings, provide societal savings; however, substantial initial investment in such programs will be required. Where health care resources are limited, as in these regions, allocation of resources to a perinatal zidovudine program will need to be considered in the context of resources required for other pressing medical care needs.



Author Affiliations

From the Epidemiology Branch (Mr Mansergh and Drs Steketee, Simonds, and Rogers), International Activity (Dr Hu), Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, and the Office of the Director (Dr Nieburg), National Center for HIV/AIDS, STD, and TB Prevention; and Prevention Effectiveness Activity, Epidemiology Program Office (Dr; Haddix), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.


Footnotes

Reprints: Gordon Mansergh, MA, MEd, Epidemiology Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, NCHSTP, MSE-45, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Cost-effectiveness of Zidovudine to Prevent Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa
Gordon Mansergh, Anne C. Haddix, Richard W. Steketee, and R. J. Simonds
JAMA. 1998;280(1):30-31.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

When is an HIV Infection Prevented and when is it Merely Delayed?
Pinkerton et al.
Eval Rev 2000;24:251-271.
ABSTRACT  

Prevention of vertical transmission of HIV: analysis of cost effectiveness of options available in South Africa
Söderlund et al.
BMJ 1999;318:1650-1656.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of Zidovudine to Prevent Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa
Mansergh et al.
JAMA 1998;280:30-31.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of Chemoprophylaxis After Occupational Exposure to HIV
Pinkerton et al.
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1972-1980.
ABSTRACT  

Preventing Perinatal Transmission of HIV: The Effect of Breast-feeding
Nicoll and Newell
JAMA 1996;276:1552-1552.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.