You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 276 No. 20, November 27, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Viability, Morbidity, and Resource Use Among Newborns of 501-to 800-g Birth Weight

Jon E. Tyson, MD, MPH; Naji Younes, PhD; Joel Verter, PhD; Linda L. Wright, MD

JAMA. 1996;276(20):1645-1651.


Abstract

Objectives.
—To assess risk factors affecting viability and analyze the effects of mechanical ventilation (MV) on neonatal outcome and resource use among extremely premature infants.

Design.
—Inception cohort study.

Setting.
—Neonatal intensive care units of the 12-center National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network.

Participants.
—A total of 1126 infants with a birth weight of 501 to 800 g born in network centers between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1995.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Observed survival; maximum estimated survival (assuming the same survival among infants who died without MV as among infants in the same risk category who received MV); observed and maximum estimated survival without severe brain injury (either interventricular echodensity with ventricular dilation or parenchymal echodensity); hospital stay; resource investment.

Results.
—Overall mortality was 43%; mortality in infants without MV was 93%. A total of 15% of all the infants died without MV. Females, small-for-gestational-age infants, and infants whose mothers received antenatal steroids had an advantage in survival with MV equivalent to an increase in birth weight of 90 g, 57 g, and 67 g, respectively. The corresponding advantage of these infants in survival without severe brain injury was 107 g, 97 g, and 64 g, respectively. Females in the lowest birth-weight group were more likely to die without MV than were larger males with a similar estimated likelihood of survival with MV. Mean hospital stay was 115 days for the survivors, values much greater than the 17.9-day standard for 501- to 800-g survivors under the diagnosis related group system. Resource investment was considerable (127 hospital days per survivor and 148 days per survivor without severe brain injury), but, like outcome, varied markedly between risk categories. Had MV been used for all infants who died, we estimate a substantial increase in resource use and a maximum of 8 additional survivors (no more than 6 without severe brain injury per 100 infants with a birth weight of 501 to 800 g.

Conclusions.
—Although recommendations to initiate or forgo MV for extremely premature infants have often focused on 1 factor (birth weight or gestational age), multiple factors should be considered. Other factors being equal, our analyses support use of MV for females at a minimum birth weight approximately 100 g lower than that for males. The current diagnosis related group reimbursement system can be expected to compromise resources for 501- to 800-g infants who would benefit from MV. Such care entails considerable resource use, although the cost per lifeyear gained is likely to be considerably less than that for many adults given intensive care. Our findings can be used to facilitate more appropriate treatment decisions, determine adequate resources, and better inform the debate about the benefits and burdens of intensive care for extremely premature newborns.



Author Affiliations

for the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network

From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas (Dr Tyson); the Biostatistics Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC (Drs Verter and Younes); and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Md (Dr Wright).


Footnotes

A complete list of the members of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network appears at the end of this article.

Reprints: Jon E. Tyson, MD, MPH, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75235.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Decision-making in Neonatal Intensive Care: Interventions on Behalf of Preterm Infants
Partridge and Dickey
NeoReviews 2009;10:e270-e279.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Resuscitation of Likely Nonviable Newborns: Would Neonatology Practices in California Change if the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act Were Enforced?
Partridge et al.
Pediatrics 2009;123:1088-1094.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decisions for life made in the perinatal period: who decides and on which standards?
Ahluwalia et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008;93:F332-F335.
FULL TEXT  

Community Supports After Surviving Extremely Low-Birth-Weight, Extremely Preterm Birth: Special Outpatient Services in Early Childhood
Hintz et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008;162:748-755.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intensive Care for Extreme Prematurity -- Moving beyond Gestational Age
Tyson et al.
NEJM 2008;358:1672-1681.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Just, in Time: Ethical Implications of Serial Predictions of Death and Morbidity for Ventilated Premature Infants
Meadow et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:732-740.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Medications for Gastroesophageal Reflux at Discharge Among Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants
Malcolm et al.
Pediatrics 2008;121:22-27.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prediction of Death for Extremely Low Birth Weight Neonates
Ambalavanan et al.
Pediatrics 2005;116:1367-1373.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcomes for Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants: Disappointing News
Tyson and Saigal
JAMA 2005;294:371-373.
FULL TEXT  

Early Death, Morbidity, and Need of Treatment Among Extremely Premature Infants
Markestad et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:1289-1298.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Resuscitation of the preterm infant against parental wishes
Paris et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F208-f210.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

End-of-Life After Birth: Death and Dying in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Singh et al.
Pediatrics 2004;114:1620-1626.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changes in Mortality for Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants in the 1990s: Implications for Treatment Decisions and Resource Use
Meadow et al.
Pediatrics 2004;113:1223-1229.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Center Differences and Outcomes of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants
Vohr et al.
Pediatrics 2004;113:781-789.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethics at the Limit of Viability: A Premie's Progress
Meadow and Lantos
NeoReviews 2003;4:e157-162.
FULL TEXT  

The Epidemiology of Severe Sepsis in Children in the United States
Watson et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2003;167:695-701.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Serial Assessment of Mortality in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit by Algorithm and Intuition: Certainty, Uncertainty, and Informed Consent
Meadow et al.
Pediatrics 2002;109:878-886.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Very Low Birth Weight Outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1995 Through December 1996
Lemons et al.
Pediatrics 2001;107:1e-1.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A National Short-Term Follow-Up Study of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants Born in Finland in 1996-1997
Tommiska et al.
Pediatrics 2001;107:2e-2.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Neonatal Nurse Practitioners' and Pediatric Residents' Care of Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants
Karlowicz and McMurray
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:1123-1126.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sex differences in outcomes of very low birthweight infants: the newborn male disadvantage
Stevenson et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000;83:182F-185.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

International Guidelines for Neonatal Resuscitation: An Excerpt From the Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: International Consensus on Science
Contributors and Reviewers for the Neonatal Resusc
Pediatrics 2000;106:29e-29.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Extremely Preterm Birth -- Defining the Limits of Hope
Cole
NEJM 2000;343:429-430.
FULL TEXT  

Mortality and Time to Death in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: California, 1987 and 1993
Gould et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:37e-37.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Parable Wrapped in an Enigma: Population-Based Assessments of Outcomes Among High-Risk Neonates Are Even Less Achievable in the Age of Clinical Informatics
Kirby
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:789-792.
FULL TEXT  

Delivery Room Resuscitation Decisions for Extremely Premature Infants
Doron et al.
Pediatrics 1998;102:574-582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Restricting Access to Neonatal Intensive Care: Effect on Mortality and Economic Savings
Stolz and McCormick
Pediatrics 1998;101:344-348.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

SURVIVAL AND OUTCOMES OF EXTREMELY PREMATURE INFANTS
JWatch General 1997;1997:5-5.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.