You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 276 No. 20, November 27, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Advance Directives and Withdrawal of Dialysis in the United States, Germany, and Japan

Ashwini R. Sehgal, MD; Christian Weisheit; Yasuhiko Miura, MD; Martin Butzlaff, MD; Rita Kielstein, MD; Yoshio Taguchi, MD, PhD

JAMA. 1996;276(20):1652-1656.


Abstract

Objective.
—To determine the role of advance directives in decisions to withdraw chronic dialysis in the United States, Germany, and Japan.

Design.
—Survey by questionnaire.

Participants.
—Seventy-two American, 87 German, and 73 Japanese nephrologists.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Each nephrologist's total number of (1) dialysis patients, (2) cases of withdrawal of dialysis, (3) patients with advance directives, and (4) uses of such directives. Nephrologists also stated whether they would continue or stop dialysis in 8 hypothetical cases.

Results.
—American, German, and Japanese nephrologists reported withdrawing dialysis for 5.1%, 1.6%, and 0.7% of their patients in the last year, respectively. Thirty percent of American patients had advance directives, and such directives were used in decision making for 3.2% of all patients. Only 0.3% of German and Japanese patients had advance directives, and such directives were used in decision making for 0.09% of patients. When asked about a hypothetical mentally incompetent patient whose family requests withdrawal of dialysis, American nephrologists were much more likely to stop dialysis in the absence of an advance directive than German or Japanese nephrologists. However, almost all nephrologists from the 3 countries would stop dialysis when a family request to withdraw was supported by a patient advance directive.

Conclusions.
—There is a high prevalence of advance directives among American dialysis patients, and such directives frequently play a role in decision making. German and Japanese nephrologists appear willing to follow advance directives, but the low prevalence of such directives limits the frequency of their use.



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Nephrology (Dr Sehgal) and the Department of Medicine (Drs Sehgal and Butzlaff and Mr Weisheit), MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Center for Biomedical Ethics and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (Dr Sehgal); Department of Internal Medicine, Sakura National Hospital, Chiba, Japan (Dr Miura); Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany (Dr Kielstein); and the International Student Center, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (Dr Taguchi).


Footnotes

Mr Weisheit is currently at the School of Medicine, Herdecke, Ruhr, Germany. Dr Butzlaff is currently at the Department of Health Services Research and Development, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle.

Reprints: Ashwini Sehgal, MD, Division of Nephrology, MetroHealth Medical Center, 2500 MetroHealth Dr, Cleveland, OH 44109-1998.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Preferences for dialysis withdrawal and engagement in advance care planning within a diverse sample of dialysis patients
Kurella Tamura et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;0:gfp430v2-gfp430.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Withholding or withdrawing dialysis in the elderly: the perspective of a western region of France
Clement et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20:2446-2452.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Case study: dementia, quality of life, and appropriate treatment.
Baumrucker
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2005;22:385-391.
 

Death after withdrawal from dialysis: the most common cause of death in a French dialysis population
Birmele et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:686-691.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Palliative care for patients with end-stage renal failure: reflections from Central Australia
Fried
Palliat Med 2003;17:514-519.
ABSTRACT  

Living With Death: The Meaning Of Acceptance
Connelly
Journal of Humanistic Psychology 2003;43:45-63.
ABSTRACT  

A messy necessary end: Health care proxies need our support
Goldblatt
Neurology 2001;56:148-152.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethical Decision Making and Patient Autonomy : A Comparison of Physicians and Patients in Japan and the United States
Ruhnke et al.
Chest 2000;118:1172-1182.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dying Well After Discontinuing the Life-Support Treatment of Dialysis
Cohen et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2513-2518.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cross-Cultural Primary Care
Perkins and Hazuda
ANN INTERN MED 2000;132:164-164.
FULL TEXT  

Dialysis Patients' Preferences for Family-Based Advance Care Planning
Hines et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1999;130:825-828.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.