You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 276 No. 7, August 21, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Effects of Pegorgotein on Neurologic Outcome of Patients With Severe Head Injury

A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

Byron Young, MD; Jeffrey W. Runge, MD; Kenneth S. Waxman, MD; Timothy Harrington, MD; Jack Wilberger, MD; J. Paul Muizelaar, MD; Alex Boddy, MS; James W. Kupiec, MD

JAMA. 1996;276(7):538-543.


Abstract

Objective.
—To evaluate outcome of patients with severe closed head injury treated with pegorgotein, a scavenger of oxygen-derived free radicals.

Design.
—Randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled, third-party—blind, multicenter trial, with a blinded, multicenter follow-up protocol.

Setting.
—Twenty-nine centers in the United States.

Patients.
—A total of 463 patients with severe closed head injury and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less after resuscitation and stabilization.

Interventions.
—Patients received a single intravenous dose of placebo, 10 000 U/kg of pegorgotein, or 20000 U/kg of pegorgotein within 8 hours after injury.

Outcome Measures.
—The primary endpoint was the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at 3 months after brain injury with GOS data trichotomized into good, fair, or poor outcome. Secondary efficacy endpoints included the Disability Rating Scale (DRS) and mortality. A secondary analysis was performed using GOS scores dichotomized into favorable and unfavorable outcomes. In a follow-up protocol at 6 months, GOS and DRS scores were again determined.

Results.
—Of 463 patients randomized, 162 received placebo; 149, pegorgotein 10000 U/kg; and 152, pegorgotein 20000 U/kg. Treatment groups were comparable with respect to demographic characteristics, mechanism of injury, and time to treatment. Pegorgotein was well tolerated at both dose levels. At month 3, the trichotomized analysis found no significant statistical difference in neurologic outcome between the pegorgotein and the placebo groups. Although differences were not statistically significant, there were more favorable outcomes and no increase in the number of deaths or vegetative states among the patients given pegorgotein, more subjects had good or favorable outcomes with the 10000-U/kg dose than with the 20000-U/kg dose or placebo, and less disability was observed with the 10000-U/kg dose than with either the 20000-U/kg dose or placebo. No differences in mortality rate or cause of death were found between the 10000-U/kg and placebo groups at either month 3 or month 6.The only statistically significant difference between the groups was a decreased incidence of adult respiratory distress syndrome in the 10000-U/kg group as compared with the placebo group (P<.015).

Conclusions.
—In this clinical trial of 463 patients with severe head injury, no statistically significant difference in neurologic outcome or mortality was observed between patients treated with pegorgotein and those receiving placebo.



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Neurosurgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington (Dr Young); Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (Dr Runge); Santa Barbara (Calif) Cottage Hospital (Dr Waxman); Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Ariz (Dr Harrington); Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa (Dr Wilberger); Department of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University, Detroit, Mich (Dr Muizelaar); and Sanofi Research Division, Sanofi Winthrop, Inc, Malvern, Pa (Dr Kupiec and Mr Boddy).


Footnotes

Reprints: Byron Young, MD, Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose St, Lexington, KY 40536-0084.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reperfusion Syndrome: Cellular Mechanisms of Microvascular Dysfunction and Potential Therapeutic Strategies
Hardev Ramandeep Singh Girn et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2007;41:277-293.
ABSTRACT  

Gene Transfer of Extracellular Superoxide Dismutase Reduces Cerebral Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Watanabe et al.
Stroke 2003;34:434-440.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antioxidant Therapy in Acute Central Nervous System Injury: Current State
Gilgun-Sherki et al.
Pharmacol. Rev. 2002;54:271-284.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of Elevated Intracranial Pressure
Vanderheyden and Buck
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2002;15:167-185.
ABSTRACT  

Neuroprotection and Traumatic Brain Injury: The Search Continues
Faden
Arch Neurol 2001;58:1553-1555.
FULL TEXT  

Cell Death After Exposure to Subarachnoid Hemolysate Correlates Inversely With Expression of CuZn-Superoxide Dismutase Editorial Comment
Matz et al.
Stroke 2000;31:2450-2459.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Free-Radical Scavenger for Head Injury Disappointing
JWatch Psychiatry 1996;1996:18-18.
FULL TEXT  

FREE RADICAL SCAVENGER FOR HEAD INJURY DISAPPOINTING
JWatch General 1996;1996:5-5.
FULL TEXT  

Pharmacologic Treatment of Acute Traumatic Brain Injury
Faden
JAMA 1996;276:569-570.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.