You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 276 No. 9, September 4, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Special Communications
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Shifting Sands of Graduate Medical Education

Marvin R. Dunn, MD; Rebecca S. Miller, MS

JAMA. 1996;276(9):710-713.


Abstract

Each year the American Medical Association (AMA) surveys all programs in graduate medical education (GME) accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Because of the importance of GME in the national workforce policy debate, this year's survey report has been expanded to provide more detailed GME data. The authors describe the historical basis of the current GME workforce dilemma and the multiple forces that now tend to neutralize efforts to adapt to a changing marketplace. For example, as resident physicians find it increasingly difficult to locate suitable employment, one would expect a reduction in hospital-based programs and in the number of their resident physician appointments. Yet, while US medical graduates (USMGs) did not pursue certain programs in this year's National Resident Matching Program, AMA data show that during the past 2 years the reduced number of residents in hospital-based programs was almost exactly offset by the increased number in new and expanded programs. Also, more USMGs are leaving residency training to enter practice after 3 years of basic training in primary care (internal medicine, pediatrics, and family practice). At the same time, an increasing number of international medical graduates are remaining in subspecialty programs. Other examples are cited to show the ebb and flow of GME activities that behave like "shifting sands."



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Graduate Medical Education, American Medical Association, Chicago, III.


Footnotes

Reprints: Division of Graduate Medical Education, American Medical Association, 515 N State St, Chicago, IL 60610.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Final Report of the FOPE II Financing of Pediatric Education Workgroup
Jones Jr. et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:1256e-1256.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evolution of the Geriatric Curriculum in General Residency Training: Recommendations for the Coming Decade
Kennedy et al.
Acad. Psychiatry 1999;23:187-197.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Graduate Medical Education, 1998-1999: A Closer Look
Miller et al.
JAMA 1999;282:855-860.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Barriers to pediatric injury prevention counseling
Cohen and Runyan
Inj. Prev. 1999;5:36-40.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Graduate Medical Education, 1997-1998
Dunn et al.
JAMA 1998;280:809-812.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Social Determinants of Pediatric Residents' Injury Prevention Counseling
Cohen et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:169-175.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

US Graduate Medical Education, 1996-1997
Dunn and Miller
JAMA 1997;278:750-754.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.