You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 277 No. 12, March 26, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Estimates of Infectious Disease Risk Factors in US Blood Donors

Alan E. Williams, PhD; Ruth A. Thomson, MPH; George B. Schreiber, DSc; Kevin Watanabe, MS; James Bethel, PhD; Annie Lo, MS; Steven H. Kleinman, MD; Charles G. Hollingsworth, DrPH; George J. Nemo, PhD

JAMA. 1997;277(12):967-972.


Abstract

Objective.
—Individuals who do not respond accurately to questions about infectious disease risk factors at the time of blood donation represent a potential threat to the safety of the blood supply. This study was designed to estimate the prevalence of undetected behavioral and other risks in current blood donors.

Design.
—Anonymous mail surveys to collect demographic, medical, and behavioral information were administered to individuals who had donated blood within the previous 2 months. Sampling weights were used in the analysis to adjust for differential sampling and response rates among demographic groups to provide prevalence estimates for the donor population.

Setting.
—Five geographically and demographically diverse US blood centers.

Participants.
—A stratified probability sample of 50162 allogeneic blood donors.

Main Outcome Measures.
—Estimated prevalence rates for risk behaviors that would have been a basis for deferral if reported at the time of the donor screening interview (deferrable risk).

Results.
—Completed questionnaires were received for 34 726 donors (69.2% of the sample). A total of 186 per 10 000 respondents (1.9%) reported a deferrable risk that was present at the time of their past donation, while 39 per 10 000 (0.4%) reported this behavior within the 3 months prior to donation. Rates (with 95% confidence intervals [Cls]) of deferrable risk behaviors were 1.4 (95% CI, 1.2-1.6) times higher for men than women, 1.6 (95% CI, 1.3-2.0) times higher for first-time vs repeat donors, 2.7 (95% CI, 2.0-3.6) times higher for donors with reactive screening tests, and 7.6 (95% CI, 3.6-15.8) times higher for donors who used the confidential unit exclusion option.

Conclusions.
—Despite the high degree of transfusion safety in the United States today, a measurable percentage of active blood donors when assessed by anonymous survey report risks for human immunodeficiency virus and other infections not reported at the time of screening, suggesting the need for further refinements in the blood donor qualification process.



Author Affiliations

for the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study

From the American Red Cross Blood Services, Holland Laboratory, Rockville, Md, and the Greater Chesapeake and Potomac Region, Baltimore, Md (Dr Williams); Westat Inc, Rockville, Md (Drs Schreiber and Bethel, Mss Thompson and Lo, and Mr Watanabe); American Red Cross Blood Services, Southern California Region, Los Angeles (Dr Kleinman); and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (Drs Hollingsworth and Nemo).


Footnotes

A list of the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study (REDS) staff members who contributed to this study appears at the end of this article.

Reprints: Alan E. Williams, PhD, American Red Cross Holland Laboratory, 15601 Crabbs Branch Way, Rockville, MD 20855.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cost-effectiveness of Implementation Methods for ELISA Serology Testing of Trypanosoma cruzi in California Blood Banks
Wilson et al.
Am J Trop Med Hyg 2008;79:53-68.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Increased All-Cause, Liver, and Cardiac Mortality among Hepatitis C Virus-seropositive Blood Donors
Guiltinan et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:743-750.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acute hepatitis B in the era of immunisation: pitfalls in the identification of high risk patients.
Rosner et al.
Postgrad. Med. J. 2006;82:207-210.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of a National Disaster on Blood Supply and Safety: The September 11 Experience
Glynn et al.
JAMA 2003;289:2246-2253.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multiple Blood Donations and Iron Deficiency in Patients With Restless Legs Syndrome
Moore and Winters
Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:654-654.
 

Prevalence, Donation Practices, and Risk Assessment of Blood Donors With Hemochromatosis
Sanchez et al.
JAMA 2001;286:1475-1481.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Update on Transfusion Therapy
O'Connor and Apfelbaum
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 2000;4:236-243.
ABSTRACT  

Trends in Incidence and Prevalence of Major Transfusion-Transmissible Viral Infections in US Blood Donors, 1991 to 1996
Glynn et al.
JAMA 2000;284:229-235.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Criteria for Screening Blood Donors: Science or Politics?
Murphy
JAMA 1997;278:289-289.
ABSTRACT  

HIV Risk Behavior among Blood Donors
AIDS Clin Care 1997;1997:4-4.
FULL TEXT  

HOW SAFE IS THE BLOOD DONOR POOL?
JWatch General 1997;1997:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.