You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 277 No. 17, May 7, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Accuracy of 3 brief screening questions for detecting partner violence in the emergency department

K. M. Feldhaus, J. Koziol-McLain, H. L. Amsbury, I. M. Norton, S. R. Lowenstein and J. T. Abbott
Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, CO 80204, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To devise a brief screening instrument to detect partner violence and to partially validate this screen against established instruments. DESIGN: Prospective survey. SETTING: Two urban, hospital-based emergency departments. PARTICIPANTS: Of 491 women presenting during 48 randomly selected 4-hour time blocks, 322 (76% of eligible patients) participated. Respondents had a median age of 36 years; 19% were black, 45% white, and 30% Hispanic, while 6% were of other racial or ethnic groups; 54% were insured. INTERVENTIONS: We developed a partner violence screen (PVS), consisting of 3 questions about past physical violence and perceived personal safety. We administered the PVS and 2 standardized measures of partner violence, the Index of Spouse Abuse (ISA) and the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the PVS were compared with the ISA and the CTS as criterion standards. RESULTS: The prevalence rate of partner violence using the PVS was 29.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.6%-34.8%). For the ISA and CTS, the prevalence rates were 24.3% (95% CI, 19.2%-30.1 %) and 27.4% (95% CI, 21.7%-33.6%), respectively. Compared with the ISA, the sensitivity of the PVS in detecting partner abuse was 64.5%; the specificity was 80.3%. When compared with the CTS, sensitivity of the PVS was 71.4%; the specificity was 84.4%. Positive predictive values ranged from 51.3% to 63.4%, and negative predictive values ranged from 87.6% to 88.7%. Overall, 13.7% of visits were the result of acute episodes of partner violence. CONCLUSION: Three brief directed questions can detect a large number of women who have a history of partner violence.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Early Detection and Prevention of Domestic Violence Using the Women Abuse Screening Tool (WAST) in Primary Health Care Clinics in Malaysia
Yut-Lin and Othman
Asia Pac J Public Health 2008;20:102-116.
ABSTRACT  

Screening for Domestic Violence in Public Welfare Offices: An Analysis of Case Manager and Client Interactions
Lindhorst et al.
Violence Against Women 2008;14:5-28.
ABSTRACT  

Abuse Behavior Inventory: Cutpoint, Validity, and Characterization of Discrepancies
Zink et al.
J Interpers Violence 2007;22:921-931.
ABSTRACT  

Partner Violence Screening in Rural Health Care Clinics
Coker et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2007;97:1319-1325.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for Intimate Partner Violence in Medical Settings
Phelan
Trauma Violence Abuse 2007;8:199-213.
ABSTRACT  

Violence involving intimate partners: Prevalence in Canadian family practice
Ahmad et al.
cfp 2007;53:460-468.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Accuracy of Five Domestic Violence Screening Questions With Nongraphic Language
Zink et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2007;46:127-134.
ABSTRACT  

Using Indirect Questions to Detect Intimate Partner Violence: The SAFE-T Questionnaire
Fulfer et al.
J Interpers Violence 2007;22:238-249.
ABSTRACT  

Approaches to screening for intimate partner violence in health care settings: a randomized trial.
MacMillan et al.
JAMA 2006;296:530-536.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mothers' Comfort with Screening Questions about Sensitive Issues, Including Domestic Violence.
Zink et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:358-367.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lowering the threshold for discussions of domestic violence: a randomized controlled trial of computer screening.
Rhodes et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1107-1114.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A predictive model to identify women with injuries related to intimate partner violence
Halpern and Dodson
Journal of the American Dental Association 2006;137:604-609.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ascertainment of intimate partner violence using two abuse measurement frameworks.
Bonomi et al.
Inj. Prev. 2006;12:121-124.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physical and Psychological Symptoms in Emotionally Abused and Non-abused Women
Porcerelli et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:201-204.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for Intimate Partner Violence Using an Audiotape Questionnaire: A Randomized Clinical Trial in a Pediatric Emergency Department
Bair-Merritt et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:311-316.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for domestic violence in a predominantly Hispanic clinical setting
Chen et al.
Fam Pract 2005;22:617-623.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Health Consequences in Women Attending Family Practice in Spain
Ruiz-Perez and Plazaola-Castano
Psychosom. Med. 2005;67:791-797.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of victims of violence admitted to an emergency department
Hofner et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2005;22:481-485.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Emergency department patients' opinions of screening for intimate partner violence among women
Hurley et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2005;22:97-98.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intimate Partner Violence and Physical Health Consequences: Policy and Practice Implications
Plichta
J Interpers Violence 2004;19:1296-1323.
ABSTRACT  

Screening for Domestic Violence in a General Pediatric Clinic: Be Prepared!
Holtrop et al.
Pediatrics 2004;114:1253-1257.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Positive Domestic Violence Screen Predicts Future Domestic Violence
Houry et al.
J Interpers Violence 2004;19:955-966.
ABSTRACT  

Rates of Domestic Violence in Southern Iraq
Tayeb
JAMA 2004;292:565-565.
FULL TEXT  

Screening Women and Elderly Adults for Family and Intimate Partner Violence: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Nelson et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:387-396.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Domestic violence in emergency medicine patients
Boyle et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2004;21:9-13.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for Intimate Partner Violence in a Primary Care Setting: The Validity of "Feeling Safe at Home" and Prevalence Results
Peralta and Fleming
J Am Board Fam Med 2003;16:525-532.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Low-Income Mothers' Experience with Poor Health, Hardship, Work, and Violence: Implications for Policy
Romero et al.
Violence Against Women 2003;9:1231-1244.
ABSTRACT  

Prevention of violence against women: Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
Wathen and MacMillan
CMAJ 2003;169:582-584.
FULL TEXT  

Screening for Intimate Partner Violence when Children are Present: The Victim's Perspective
Zink and Jacobson
J Interpers Violence 2003;18:872-890.
ABSTRACT  

Interventions for Violence Against Women: Scientific Review
Wathen and MacMillan
JAMA 2003;289:589-600.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Violent Victimization of Women and Men: Physical and Psychiatric Symptoms
Porcerelli et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2003;16:32-39.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Welfare to Work? Impact of Maternal Health on Employment
Romero et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2002;92:1462-1468.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Parental Screening for Intimate Partner Violence by Pediatricians and Family Physicians
Borowsky and Ireland
Pediatrics 2002;110:509-516.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening Mothers for Intimate Partner Abuse at Well-Baby Care Visits: The Right Thing to Do
Thompson and Krugman
JAMA 2001;285:1628-1630.
FULL TEXT  

Emergency Department Staff Responses to a Protocol of Care for Abused Women
Loughlin et al.
Health Educ Behav 2000;27:572-590.
ABSTRACT  

Everything's Not O.K. at Home
Feingold
CLIN PEDIATR 2000;39:41-42.
 

Risk Factors for Injury to Women from Domestic Violence
Kyriacou et al.
NEJM 1999;341:1892-1898.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of sexualized violence among women: A population-based study in a primary healthcare district
Risberg et al.
Scand J Public Health 1999;27:247-253.
ABSTRACT  

Domestic Violence
Eisenstat and Bancroft
NEJM 1999;341:886-892.
FULL TEXT  

High Rape Chronicity and Low Rates of Help-Seeking Among Wife Rape Survivors in a Nonclinical Sample: Implications for Research and Practice
MAHONEY
Violence Against Women 1999;5:993-1016.
ABSTRACT  

Family Violence: Implications for the Pediatrician
Knapp and Dowd
Pediatr. Rev. 1998;19:316-321.
FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of Intimate Partner Abuse in Women Treated at Community Hospital Emergency Departments
Dearwater et al.
JAMA 1998;280:433-438.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Identifying Victims of Domestic Violence
JWatch Psychiatry 1997;1997:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

A Three-Question Screen for Domestic Violence
JWatch Women's Health 1997;1997:8-8.
FULL TEXT  

A QUICK SCREENING TOOL FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
JWatch General 1997;1997:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.