This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Public Health Intervention

Jon S. Vernick, JD, MPH; Stephen P. Teret, JD, MPH; Daniel W. Webster, ScD, MPH

JAMA. 1997;277(17):1391-1397.

Abstract
Firearms are a consumer product responsible for 38 500 deaths in the United States in 1994. Like other products, firearms are advertised. In the absence of rules governing the design of firearms, regulating the way guns are advertised may be a useful public health intervention. Some gun advertisements include messages suggesting that bringing a handgun into the home is generally protective for the occupants of the home. The best available scientific information contradicts this message. Given this disjunction, regulating those advertisements may be an appropriate response. Under federal law, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has authority to prohibit advertisements that are "deceptive" or "unfair." Under the FTC's deception analysis, the focus is on whether consumers are misled by an advertisement. For a finding of unfairness, the FTC looks for advertisements that may cause substantial injury to consumers. Under either analysis, a strong argument can be made that firearm advertisements promising home protection are unlawful. On February 14,1996, several organizations sent separate petitions to the FTC asking it to consider the issues raised by firearm advertisements that promise home protection. The FTC is still reviewing the information presented. There are no First Amendment or Second Amendment impediments to FTC regulation of deceptive firearm advertising under the US Constitution.

Author Affiliations
From The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Center for Gun Policy and Research, Baltimore, Md.

Footnotes
Reprints: Jon S. Vernick, JD, MPH, The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Center for Gun Policy and Research, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205.

Health Law and Ethics section editors: Lawrence O. Gostin, JD, the Georgetown/ Johns Hopkins University Program on Law and Public Health, Washington, DC, and Baltimore, Md; Helene M. Cole, MD, Contributing Editor, JAMA.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Firearm Advertising: Product Depiction in Consumer Gun Magazines
Saylor et al.
Eval Rev 2004;28:420-433.
ABSTRACT  

How the Law Affects Gun Policy in the United States: Law as Intervention or Obstacle to Prevention
Vernick and Mair
J Law Med Ethics 2002;30:692-704.
 

Firearms in the Home: Parental Perceptions
Farah et al.
Pediatrics 1999;104:1059-1063.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

SPLINTERS & FRAGMENTS
Shield
Inj. Prev. 1998;4:84-84.
FULL TEXT  

Regulating Firearm Advertisements
Blackman
JAMA 1997;278:702-702.
ABSTRACT  

Regulating Firearm Advertisements
Orr
JAMA 1997;278:701-702.
ABSTRACT  

Regulating Firearm Advertisements
Paola
JAMA 1997;278:702-702.
ABSTRACT  

Regulating Firearm Advertisements
Pipas
JAMA 1997;278:702-702.
ABSTRACT