Recommended prostate-specific antigen testing intervals for the detection of curable prostate cancer
H. B. Carter, J. I. Epstein, D. W. Chan, J. L. Fozard and J. D. Pearson
Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md 21287-2101, USA. hcarter@gwgate1.jhmi.jhu.edu
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing intervals
that maintain the detection of curable cancer and reduce unnecessary
testing. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Historical prospective study of serial PSA
measurements at 2- and 4-year intervals from frozen serum samples of 40 men
who eventually developed prostate cancer and 272 men without prostate
cancer who were participants in a prospective aging study (Gerontology
Research Center of the National Institute on Aging, the Baltimore
Longitudinal Study of Aging) and the case series of 389 consecutive men
treated surgically for nonpalpable prostate cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Probability of a PSA conversion to 4.1 to 5.0 ng/mL and to greater than 5.0
ng/mL at 2 and 4 years and probability of detecting curable prostate cancer
by age and PSA level. RESULTS: When the pretreatment PSA level was less
than or equal to 4.0 ng/mL, nonpalpable prostate cancers were highly likely
(34/36, 94%) to be curable (organ-confined or capsular penetration with
Gleason score < 7 and negative margins), and the majority (25/36, 69%)
were small cancers (confined tumor < or = 0.5 cm3 with no Gleason
pattern 4 or 5). When the pretreatment PSA level was greater than 4.0 ng/mL
and less than or equal to 5.0 ng/mL, cancers were highly likely to be
curable (32/36, 89%), and a minority were small cancers (12/36, 33%). When
the pretreatment PSA level was greater than 5.0 ng/mL, 96 (30%) of 317
cancers were noncurable. The PSA conversion (for cancer cases) to a level
at which cure is less likely (> 5.0 ng/mL) is rare (0%) after 2 or 4
years when the initial PSA is less than 2.0 ng/mL. PSA conversion to a
range at which cancers are likely to be curable and less likely to be small
(4.1-5.0 ng/mL) is rare after 2 years (0%-4%) when the baseline PSA level
is less than 2.0 ng/mL but common when the baseline PSA level is between
2.1 and 3.0 ng/mL (27%) or 3.1 and 4.0 ng/mL (36%). CONCLUSIONS: These data
suggest that for men with no cancer suspected on digital rectal
examination, a PSA level of 4.0 to 5.0 ng/mL is an acceptable range for
maintaining the detection of curable prostate cancer and a 2-year PSA
testing interval is not likely to miss a curable prostate cancer when the
initial PSA level is less than 2.0 ng/mL. Recognizing that 70% of a
screened population between the ages of 50 years and 70 years have PSA
levels less than 2.0 ng/mL, elimination of annual PSA testing for these men
would result in large health care cost savings.
Pathologic Characteristics of Cancers Detected in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial: Implications for Prostate Cancer Detection and Chemoprevention
Lucia et al.
Cancer Prevention Research 2008;1:167-173.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Is Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity Useful in Early Detection of Prostate Cancer? A Critical Appraisal of the Evidence
Etzioni et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1510-1515.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Interval Cancers in Prostate Cancer Screening: Comparing 2- and 4-Year Screening Intervals in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Gothenburg and Rotterdam
Roobol et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1296-1303.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Detection of Prostate Cancer at Low and Intermediate Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels in a Country with a Low Incidence of Prostate Cancer
Lee et al.
Jpn J Clin Oncol 2006;36:376-380.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Assessing risk: does this patient have prostate cancer?
Carter
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:506-507.
FULL TEXT
Individualized Screening Interval for Prostate Cancer Based on Prostate-Specific Antigen Level: Results of a Prospective, Randomized, Population-Based Study
Aus et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1857-1861.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Improved Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Classification and Regression Tree Analysis
Garzotto et al.
JCO 2005;23:4322-4329.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Prostate Cancers in Men with Low PSA Levels -- Must We Find Them?
Carter
NEJM 2004;350:2292-2294.
FULL TEXT
Second Round Results of the Finnish Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial
Makinen et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:2231-2236.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Update of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Harris and Lohr
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:917-929.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pathologic Features of Prostate Cancer Found at Population-Based Screening With a Four-Year Interval
Hoedemaeker et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1153-1158.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Comparative Efficiency of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Strategies for Prostate Cancer Detection
Ross et al.
JAMA 2000;284:1399-1405.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
PSA screening: a view from the front lines
Greiver et al.
CMAJ 2000;162:789-790.
FULL TEXT
HOW OFTEN SHOULD PSA LEVELS BE CHECKED?
JWatch General 1997;1997:4-4.
FULL TEXT