You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 277 No. 18, May 14, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer

L. F. Degner, L. J. Kristjanson, D. Bowman, J. A. Sloan, K. C. Carriere, J. O'Neil, B. Bilodeau, P. Watson and B. Mueller
Faculty of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of involvement women with breast cancer wanted in medical decision making, extent to which they believed they had achieved their preferred level of involvement, and types of information they judged to be most important. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional survey at 2 tertiary oncology referral clinics and 2 community hospital oncology clinics in Winnipeg, Manitoba. PATIENTS: Consecutive sample of 1012 women with a confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer who were scheduled for a visit at 1 of 4 hospital oncology clinics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The following measures were used: (1) Preferences about various levels of participation in treatment decision making; (2) the extent to which subjects believed they had achieved their preferred levels of involvement in decision making; and (3) priority needs for information and how these needs differed by selected sociodemographic, disease, and treatment variables. RESULTS: A total of 22% of women wanted to select their own cancer treatment, 44% wanted to select their treatment collaboratively with their physicians, and 34% wanted to delegate this responsibility to their physicians. Only 42% of women believed they had achieved their preferred level of control in decision making. The 2 most highly ranked types of information were related to knowing about chances of cure and spread of disease. Women younger than 50 years rated information about physical and sexual attractiveness as more important than did older women (P<.001); women older than 70 years rated information about self-care as more important than did younger women (P=.002); and women who had a positive family history of breast cancer rated information about family risk as more important than did other women (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: The substantial discrepancy between women's preferred and attained levels of involvement in treatment decision making suggests that systematic approaches to assess and respond to women's desired level of participation in treatment decision making need to be evaluated. Priorities for information identified in this study provide an empirical basis to guide communication with women seeking care for breast cancer.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The views of cancer patients on patient rights in the context of information and autonomy
Erer et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:384-388.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How willing are patients to question healthcare staff on issues related to the quality and safety of their healthcare? An exploratory study
Davis et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:90-96.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician-Identified Factors Affecting Patient Participation in Reaching Treatment Decisions
Shepherd et al.
JCO 2008;26:1724-1731.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Desire for Information and Involvement in Treatment Decisions: Elderly Cancer Patients' Preferences and Their Physicians' Perceptions
Elkin et al.
JCO 2007;25:5275-5280.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Case 32-2007 -- A 62-Year-Old Woman with a Second Breast Cancer
Winer et al.
NEJM 2007;357:1640-1648.
FULL TEXT  

``It's My Body'': Does Patient Involvement in Decision Making Reduce Decisional Conflict?
Kremer et al.
Med Decis Making 2007;27:522-532.
ABSTRACT  

Participation in Medical Decision Making: The Patients' Perspective
Fraenkel and McGraw
Med Decis Making 2007;27:533-538.
ABSTRACT  

Shared Decision-Making Preferences of People With Severe Mental Illness
Adams et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2007;58:1219-1221.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The B12/CRP index as a simple prognostic indicator in patients with advanced cancer: a confirmatory study
Kelly et al.
Ann Oncol 2007;18:1395-1399.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Doctors' and Patients' Preferences for Participation and Treatment in Curative Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy
Stalmeier et al.
JCO 2007;25:3096-3100.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting prognosis in patients with advanced cancer
Stone and Lund
Ann Oncol 2007;18:971-976.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Breast cancer patients' expectations in respect of the physician-patient relationship and treatment management results of a survey of 617 patients
Oskay-Ozcelik et al.
Ann Oncol 2007;18:479-484.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Retention and Use of Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk Information from Genomic Tests: The Role of Health Literacy
Lillie et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:249-255.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fertility preservation in young women undergoing breast cancer therapy.
Sonmezer and Oktay
The Oncologist 2006;11:422-434.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do oncologists discuss expensive anti-cancer drugs with their patients?
Thomson et al.
Ann Oncol 2006;17:702-708.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Advanced Breast Cancer Patients' Perceptions of Decision Making for Palliative Chemotherapy
Grunfeld et al.
JCO 2006;24:1090-1098.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Phenomenology of Deciding About Hemodialysis Among Taiwanese
Lin et al.
West J Nurs Res 2005;27:915-929.
ABSTRACT  

Would Caregivers of Alzheimer Disease Patients Involve Their Relative in a Decision to Use an AD-Slowing Medication?
Hirschman et al.
AJGP 2005;13:1014-1021.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Women's Decision-Making Roles Regarding Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
Nekhlyudov et al.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005;2005:55-60.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Enhanced Counseling for Women Undergoing BRCA1/2 Testing: Impact on Subsequent Decision Making About Risk Reduction Behaviors
Miller et al.
Health Educ Behav 2005;32:654-667.
ABSTRACT  

Outcomes From the Moving Beyond Cancer Psychoeducational, Randomized, Controlled Trial With Breast Cancer Patients
Stanton et al.
JCO 2005;23:6009-6018.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preference-Based Antithrombotic Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation: Implications for Clinical Decision Making
Man-Son-Hing et al.
Med Decis Making 2005;25:548-559.
ABSTRACT  

Patient Involvement in Surgery Treatment Decisions for Breast Cancer
Katz et al.
JCO 2005;23:5526-5533.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fertility- and Menopause-Related Information Needs of Younger Women With a Diagnosis of Early Breast Cancer
Thewes et al.
JCO 2005;23:5155-5165.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Many people with epilepsy want to know more: a qualitative study
Prinjha et al.
Fam Pract 2005;22:435-441.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Communicating prognosis in cancer care: a systematic review of the literature
Hagerty et al.
Ann Oncol 2005;16:1005-1053.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Information and Involvement Preferences of Women in Their 40s Before Their First Screening Mammogram
Nekhlyudov et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1370-1374.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do Alzheimer's Disease Patients Want to Participate in a Treatment Decision, and Would Their Caregivers Let Them?
Hirschman et al.
Gerontologist 2005;45:381-388.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Can Patients Interpret Health Information? An Assessment of the Medical Data Interpretation Test
Schwartz et al.
Med Decis Making 2005;25:290-300.
ABSTRACT  

Patients with Cancer: their approaches to participation in treatment plan decisions
Ramfelt and Lutzen
Nurs Ethics 2005;12:143-155.
ABSTRACT  

Communicating With Realism and Hope: Incurable Cancer Patients' Views on the Disclosure of Prognosis
Hagerty et al.
JCO 2005;23:1278-1288.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical ethics, information, and communication: review of 31 cases from a clinical ethics committee
Forde and Vandvik
J. Med. Ethics 2005;31:73-77.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decisional role preferences, risk knowledge and information interests in patients with multiple sclerosis
Heesen et al.
Mult Scler 2004;10:643-650.
ABSTRACT  

Cancer Consultation Preparation Package: Changing Patients but Not Physicians Is Not Enough
Butow et al.
JCO 2004;22:4401-4409.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decision Making at a Time of Crisis Near the End of Life
Weissman
JAMA 2004;292:1738-1743.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Descriptive Review of the Literature on Breast Cancer Outcomes: 1990 Through 2000
Mandelblatt et al.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2004;2004:8-44.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Crossing the Quality Chasm in Breast Cancer Care
Silliman
JCO 2004;22:3654-3656.
FULL TEXT  

Compliance With Consensus Recommendations for Systemic Therapy Is Associated With Improved Survival of Women With Node-Negative Breast Cancer
Hebert-Croteau et al.
JCO 2004;22:3685-3693.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient-Physician Concordance: Preferences, Perceptions, and Factors Influencing the Breast Cancer Surgical Decision
Janz et al.
JCO 2004;22:3091-3098.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Women's Preferences for Doctor's Involvement in Decisions about Mammography Screening
Chamot et al.
Med Decis Making 2004;24:379-385.
ABSTRACT  

Determinants of Patients' Choice of Reconstruction with Mastectomy for Primary Breast Cancer
Ananian et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2004;11:762-771.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How Does an Alzheimer's Disease Patient's Role in Medical Decision Making Change Over Time?
Hirschman et al.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2004;17:55-60.
ABSTRACT  

Pooled Analysis of Fluorouracil-Based Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II and III Colon Cancer: Who Benefits and by How Much?
Gill et al.
JCO 2004;22:1797-1806.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient Characteristics and Experiences Associated With Trust in Specialist Physicians
Keating et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1015-1020.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cancer Patient Preferences for Communication of Prognosis in the Metastatic Setting
Hagerty et al.
JCO 2004;22:1721-1730.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment Decision Aids in Advanced Cancer: When the Goal Is Not Cure and the Answer Is Not Clear
Leighl et al.
JCO 2004;22:1759-1762.
FULL TEXT  

Oncology Physician and Nurse Practices and Attitudes Regarding Offering Clinical Trial Results To Study Participants
Partridge et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:629-632.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Stress Response Syndromes in Women Undergoing Mammography: A Comparison of Women With and Without a History of Breast Cancer
Gurevich et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2004;66:104-112.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: How Presentation of Recurrence Risk Influences Decision-Making
Chao et al.
JCO 2003;21:4299-4305.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Providing Audiotapes of Primary Adjuvant Treatment Consultations to Women With Breast Cancer: A Multisite, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Hack et al.
JCO 2003;21:4138-4144.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Satisfaction with primary care: the perspectives of people with schizophrenia
Lester et al.
Fam Pract 2003;20:508-513.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Self-Directed Learning of Women with Breast Cancer
Rager
Adult Education Quarterly 2003;53:277-293.
ABSTRACT  

Direct Observation of Requests for Clinical Services in Office Practice: What Do Patients Want and Do They Get It?
Kravitz et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1673-1681.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Complexities in Prognostication in Advanced Cancer: "To Help Them Live Their Lives the Way They Want to"
Lamont and Christakis
JAMA 2003;290:98-104.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Validation of a Decision Regret Scale
Brehaut et al.
Med Decis Making 2003;23:281-292.
ABSTRACT  

The Effect of Age on the Use of Health and Self-Care Information: Confronting the Stereotype
Wagner and Wagner
Gerontologist 2003;43:318-324.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Women's preferences and consultants' communication of risk in consultations about familial breast cancer: impact on patient outcomes
Lobb et al.
J. Med. Genet. 2003;40:e56-56.
FULL TEXT  

Helping Patients Make Informed Choices: A Randomized Trial of a Decision Aid for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer
Whelan et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:581-587.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cancer Patients Seeking a Second Surgical Opinion: Results of a Study on Motives, Needs, and Expectations
Mellink et al.
JCO 2003;21:1492-1497.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What do patients value in their hospital care? An empirical perspective on autonomy centred bioethics
Joffe et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2003;29:103-108.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Self-Management Decision Influences in Heart Failure: A Preliminary Investigation
Hicks and Holm
Clin Nurs Res 2003;12:69-84.
ABSTRACT  

The resourceful patient.: JA Muir Gray. (173 pages, {pound}14.50.) eRosetta Press Ltd, 2002. ISBN 1-904202-00-4.
Campion
Fam Pract 2002;19:709-709.
FULL TEXT  

A Trial of Two Questions
Whelan
JCO 2002;20:4135-4138.
FULL TEXT  

Individualizing Treatment Decisions: The Likelihood of Being Helped or Harmed
Straus
Eval Health Prof 2002;25:210-224.
ABSTRACT  

Truth may hurt but deceit hurts more: communication in palliative care
Fallowfield et al.
Palliat Med 2002;16:297-303.
ABSTRACT  

Audiotapes of oncology consultations: only for the first consultation?
Knox et al.
Ann Oncol 2002;13:622-627.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment Decision Making in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Should Surgeons Match Patients' Desired Level of Involvement?
Keating et al.
JCO 2002;20:1473-1479.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Communication Between Physicians and Older Women With Localized Breast Cancer: Implications for Treatment and Patient Satisfaction
Liang et al.
JCO 2002;20:1008-1016.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

When the Treatment Goal Is Not Cure: Are Cancer Patients Equipped to Make Informed Decisions?
Gattellari et al.
JCO 2002;20:503-513.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Enhancing Physician-Patient Communication
Lee et al.
ASH Education Book 2002;2002:464-483.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decision-Making Process--Communicating Risk/Benefits: Is There an Ideal Technique?
Levine and Whelan
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2001;2001:143-145.
FULL TEXT  

A Diabetes-Specific Measure of Patient Desire to Participate in Medical Decision Making
Golin et al.
The Diabetes Educator 2001;27:875-886.
ABSTRACT  

Engaging patients in medical decision making
Kravitz and Melnikow
BMJ 2001;323:584-585.
FULL TEXT  

Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools
Robinson and Thomson
Qual Saf Health Care 2001;10:i34-38.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized Clinical Trials in Oncology: Understanding and Attitudes Predict Willingness to Participate
Ellis et al.
JCO 2001;19:3554-3561.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Disclosure to Patients with Cancer near the End of Life
Lamont and Christakis
ANN INTERN MED 2001;134:1096-1105.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cancer Screening in Elderly Patients: A Framework for Individualized Decision Making
Walter and Covinsky
JAMA 2001;285:2750-2756.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are members of multidisciplinary teams in breast cancer aware of each other's informational roles?
Jenkins et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2001;10:70-75.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient Preferences Versus Physician Perceptions of Treatment Decisions in Cancer Care
Bruera et al.
JCO 2001;19:2883-2885.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decision Support for Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Effects of an Interactive Breast Cancer CDROM on Treatment Decision, Satisfaction, and Quality of Life
Molenaar et al.
JCO 2001;19:1676-1687.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Discussing Adjuvant Cancer Therapy
Leighl et al.
JCO 2001;19:1768-1778.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician Sex and Other Factors Associated With Type of Breast Cancer Surgery in Older Women
Cyran et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:185-191.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The potential use of decision analysis to support shared decision making in the face of uncertainty: the example of atrial fibrillation and warfarin anticoagulation
Robinson and Thomson
Qual Saf Health Care 2000;9:238-244.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XX. Integrating Research Evidence With the Care of the Individual Patient
McAlister et al.
JAMA 2000;283:2829-2836.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Building Bridges Between Physicians and Patients: Results of a Pilot Study Examining New Tools for Collaborative Decision Making in Breast Cancer
Sepucha et al.
JCO 2000;18:1230-1238.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Extent and determinants of error in doctors' prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study • Commentary: Why do doctors overestimate? • Commentary: Prognoses should be based on proved indices not intuition
Christakis et al.
BMJ 2000;320:469-473.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interpretive Review : Feasibility and Effects of Decision Aids
Molenaar et al.
Med Decis Making 2000;20:112-127.
ABSTRACT  

The Evolving Roles of Patient and Physician
Lang
Arch Fam Med 2000;9:65-67.
FULL TEXT  

Mastectomy or Lumpectomy? Helping Women Make Informed Choices
Whelan et al.
JCO 1999;17:1727-1727.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Review: research on chronic illness has shifted towards viewing the individual as empowered and a partner in the health management process
Martin
Evid. Based Nurs. 1999;2:32-32.
FULL TEXT  

Preferences for Participation in Treatment Decision Making and Information Needs of Parents of Children With Cancer: A Pilot Study
Pyke-Grimm et al.
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing 1999;16:13-24.
ABSTRACT  

Decision Aids for Patients Considering Options Affecting Cancer Outcomes: Evidence of Efficacy and Policy Implications
O'Connor et al.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999;1999:67-80.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Informing Patients: A Guide for Providing Patient Health Information
Tang and Newcomb
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1998;5:563-570.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethical debate: Truth, the first casualty • Deadly charades • Communication is a vital part of care • Doctors and patients should be fellow travellers
Blennerhassett et al.
BMJ 1998;316:1890-1893.
FULL TEXT  

Quality-of-Life Assessment in Health Care Research and Practice
Martin and Stockler
Eval Health Prof 1998;21:141-156.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.