 |
|
Does It Make Clinical Sense to Equate Terminally III Patients Who Require Life-Sustaining Interventions With Those Who Do Not?
Ann Alpers, JD;
Bernard Lo, MD
JAMA. 1997;277(21):1705-1708.
Abstract
| |
Two US courts of appeals have ruled that competent, terminally ill patients have a constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide. The cases are now before the US Supreme Court, which is expected to issue a ruling later this year. This article analyzes the keystone of the courts' ruling: their assertion that competent, terminally ill patients who are being kept alive on life support are equivalent to competent, terminally ill patients who do not require such support. Because the former are permitted to end their lives by refusing treatment, the courts found that the latter also have a right to determine the time and manner of their death, through prescriptions for lethal doses of medication. This article analyzes whether the courts' thinking is premised on a clinically plausible view of the care of terminally ill patients. Based on a discussion of common situations involving terminal illness, we argue that the courts' reasoning is deeply flawed. The article also analyzes how the implications of the courts' reasoning might undermine the care of terminally ill patients.
Author Affiliations
From the Program in Medical Ethics, the Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, and the Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Footnotes
Reprints: Ann Alpers, JD, Room C 126, 521 Parnassus Av, San Francisco, CA 94143-0903 (e-mail: ann_alpers @ucsfdgim.ucsf.edu).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Terminal withdrawal of life-sustaining supplemental oxygen.
Halpern and Hansen-Flaschen
JAMA 2006;296:1397-1400.
FULL TEXT
Euthanasia, efficiency, and the historical distinction between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die.
Bishop
J. Med. Ethics 2006;32:220-224.
FULL TEXT
Dying Well After Discontinuing the Life-Support Treatment of Dialysis
Cohen et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2513-2518.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Assisted Suicide Compared with Refusal of Treatment: A Valid Distinction?
Miller et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2000;132:470-475.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Suicide, Hastening Death, and Psychiatry
Cohen
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1973-1976.
FULL TEXT
Palliative Options of Last Resort: A Comparison of Voluntarily Stopping Eating and Drinking, Terminal Sedation, Physician-Assisted Suicide, and Voluntary Active Euthanasia
Quill et al.
JAMA 1997;278:2099-2104.
ABSTRACT
The Rule of Double Effect -- A Critique of Its Role in End-of-Life Decision Making
Quill et al.
NEJM 1997;337:1768-1771.
FULL TEXT
|
