You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 277 No. 22, June 11, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Variations in Cataract Extraction Rates in Medicare Prepaid and Fee-for-Service Settings

Caroline Lubick Goldzweig, MD, MSPH; Brian S. Mittman, PhD; Grace M. Carter, PhD; Tenzing Donyo, MBA; Robert H. Brook, MD, ScD; Paul Lee, MD, JD; Carol M. Mangione, MD, MSPH

JAMA. 1997;277(22):1765-1768.


Abstract

Objective.
—To compare rates of cataract extraction in 2 prepaid health settings and in traditional fee-for-service (FFS) settings.

Design.
—A cross-sectional analysis using 1993 health maintenance organization (HMO) Medicare claims and encounter files, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) 5% Medicare Part B provider/supplier file, and the HCFA October 1992 100% Medicare population file.

Setting.
—Southern California Medicare FFS settings and the staff-model and independent practice association (IPA) plans of a large California HMO.

Patients.
—1993 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older. The study included 43 387 staff-model HMO enrollees, 19050 IPA enrollees, and 47150 FFS beneficiaries (a 5% sample of all Southern California FFS beneficiaries).

Main Outcome Measure.
—Age and risk-factor adjusted rates of cataract extraction per 1000 beneficiary-years.

Results.
—After controlling for age, sex, and diabetes mellitus status, FFS beneficiaries were twice as likely to undergo cataract extraction as were prepaid beneficiaries (P<.01). Female FFS beneficiaries were nearly twice as likely to undergo the procedure as were male FFS beneficiaries (P<.001); there were no extraction rate differences by sex in the prepaid settings.

Conclusion.
—Because of the potential implications for vision care in the elderly, the significantly different rates of cataract extraction in FFS and prepaid settings warrant further clinical investigation to determine whether there is overuse in FFS vs underuse in prepaid settings. Such investigations must assess the appropriateness of cataract surgery by evaluating its use relative to clinical need.



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Los Angeles, Calif (Dr Goldzweig); Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles School of Medicine (Drs Goldzweig, Brook, and Mangione); RAND, Santa Monica, Calif (Drs Goldzweig, Mittman, Carter, Brook, Lee, and Mangione and Mr Donyo); and the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles (Dr Lee).


Footnotes

This project was funded by the health maintenance organization that was the subject of the study. This health maintenance organization was not involved in data analysis or the interpretation of results.

Reprints: Caroline Lubick Goldzweig, MD, MSPH, Division of General Internal Medicine, West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 11301 Wilshire Blvd, 111G, Los Angeles, CA 90073 (e-mail: GOLDZWEIG.CAROLINE_L@WEST-LA.VA.GOV).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

MEDICARE AND THE FUTURE OF RETIREMENT SECURITY: Robert H. Binstock, PhD, Editor
Polivka
Gerontologist 2007;47:123-130.
FULL TEXT  

Longitudinal rates of cataract surgery.
Williams et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:1308-1314.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Physician Reimbursement Methodology on the Rate and Cost of Cataract Surgery
Shrank et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1733-1738.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Need for Eye Care Among Older Adults With Diabetes Mellitus in Fee-for-Service and Managed Medicare
Brown et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:669-675.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Causes and Prevalence of Visual Impairment Among Adults in the United States
The Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:477-485.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of Cataract and Pseudophakia/Aphakia Among Adults in the United States
The Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:487-494.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

HMO Plan Performance Update: An Analysis Of The Literature, 1997-2001
Miller and Luft
Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:63-86.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Eye Care and Associated Charges Among the Medicare Population: 1991-1998
Ellwein and Urato
Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:804-811.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Appropriateness Ratings for Cataract Surgery between Convened and Mail-only Multidisciplinary Panels
Tobacman et al.
Med Decis Making 2001;21:490-497.
ABSTRACT  

Quality of Life: Erosions and Opportunities Under Managed Care
Morreim
J Law Med Ethics 2000;28:144-158.
 

A Revival of Paul Dudley White : An Overview of Present Medical Practice and of Our Society
Favaloro
Circulation 1999;99:1525-1537.
FULL TEXT  

Assessing Quality and Utilization Patterns in Health Care Delivery Systems
Lee
Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:234-235.
FULL TEXT  

Cataract Extraction Rates and Insurance Status
Dahl
JAMA 1997;278:1489-1489.
ABSTRACT  

Cataract Extraction Rates and Insurance Status
Kliger
JAMA 1997;278:1490-1490.
ABSTRACT  

Cataract Extraction Rates and insurance Status
Peterson and Silberman
JAMA 1997;278:1489-1489.
ABSTRACT  

Cataract Extraction Rates and Insurance Status
Prager et al.
JAMA 1997;278:1489-1490.
ABSTRACT  

Should Rates of Cataract Surgery Vary by Insurance Status?
Obstbaum
Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:917-918.
ABSTRACT  

CATARACT EXTRACTION RATES UNDER HMO VS. FEE-FOR-SERVICE
JWatch General 1997;1997:7-7.
FULL TEXT  

Should Rates of Cataract Surgery Vary by Insurance Status?
Obstbaum
JAMA 1997;277:1807-1808.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.