You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 277 No. 7, February 19, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Does this patient have an abnormal systolic murmur?

E. Etchells, C. Bell and K. Robb
Division of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Toronto, Ontario. eetchells@torhosp.toronto.on.ca

Our objective was to review the available evidence of the precision and accuracy of the clinical examination for abnormal systolic murmurs. We conducted a MEDLINE search, manually reviewed all reference lists, and contacted authors of published studies. Each study was independently reviewed by 2 observers and graded for methodologic quality. We found that most studies were conducted using cardiologist examiners. In the clinical setting, the reliability of detecting systolic murmurs was fair (kappa, 0.30-0.48). The most useful findings for ruling in aortic stenosis are a slow rate of rise of the carotid pulse (positive likelihood ratio, 2.8-130), mid to late peak intensity of the murmur (positive likelihood ratio, 8.0-101), and decreased intensity of the second heart sound (positive likelihood ratio, 3.1-50). The most useful finding for ruling out aortic stenosis is the absence of murmur radiation to the right carotid artery (negative likelihood ratio, 0.05-0.10). Smaller, lower-quality studies indicate that cardiologists can accurately rule in and rule out mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and echocardiographic mitral valve prolapse. We conclude that the clinical examination by cardiologists is accurate for detecting various causes of abnormal systolic murmurs. Studies of the clinical examination by noncardiologists are needed.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Assessing and Reducing the Cardiac Risk of Noncardiac Surgery
Auerbach and Goldman
Circulation 2006;113:1361-1376.
FULL TEXT  

Does This Dyspneic Patient in the Emergency Department Have Congestive Heart Failure?
Wang et al.
JAMA 2005;294:1944-1956.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mastering Cardiac Murmurs: The Power of Repetition
Barrett et al.
Chest 2004;126:470-475.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Determinants and assessment of regurgitation after mitral valve repair
Lim et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2002;124:911-917.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does This Patient Have Aortic Regurgitation?
Choudhry and Etchells
JAMA 1999;281:2231-2238.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Systolic ejection murmurs in the era of modern cardiology: What do we really know?
Murgo
J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1596-1602.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.