You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 278 No. 13, October 1, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Antihypertensive Treatment Based on Conventional or Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Jan A. Staessen, MD, PhD; Geert Byttebier, MSc; Frank Buntinx, MD, PhD; Hilde Celis, MD; Eoin T. O'Brien, MD, FRCP; Robert Fagard, MD, PhD

JAMA. 1997;278(13):1065-1072.


Abstract

Context.
—Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring is used increasingly in clinical practice, but how it affects treatment of blood pressure has not been determined.

Objective.
—To compare conventional blood pressure (CBP) measurement and ABP measurement in the management of hypertensive patients.

Design.
—Multicenter randomized, parallel-group trial.

Setting
—Family practices and outpatient clinics at regional and university hospitals.

Participants.
—A total of 419 patients (-18 years), whose untreated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) on CBP measurement averaged 95 mm Hg or higher, randomized to CBP or ABP arms.

Interventions.
—Antihypertensive drug treatment was adjusted in a stepwise fashion based on either the average daytime (from 10 am to 8 pm) ambulatory DBP (n=213) or the average of 3 sitting DBP readings (n=206). If the DBP guiding treatment was above (>89 mm Hg), at (80-89 mm Hg), or below (<80 mm Hg) target, 1 physician blinded to the patients' randomization intensified antihypertensive treatment, left it unchanged, or reduced it, respectively.

Main Outcome Measures.
—The CBP and ABP levels, intensity of drug treatment, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic left ventricular mass, symptoms reported by questionnaire, and cost.

Results.
—At the end of the study (median follow-up, 182 days; 5th to 95th percentile interval, 85-258 days), more ABP than CBP patients had stopped anithypertensive drug treatment (26.3% vs 7.3%; P<.001), and fewer ABP patients had progressed to sustained multiple-drug treatment (27.2% vs 42.7%; P<.001). The final CBP and 24-hour ABP averaged 144.1/89.9 mm Hg and 129.4/79.5 mm Hg in the ABP group and 140.3/89.6 mm Hg and 128.0/79.1 mm Hg in the CBP group. Left ventricular mass and reported symptoms were similar in the 2 groups. The potential savings in the ABP group in termsof less intensive drug treatment and fewer physician visits were offset by the costs of ABP monitoring.

Conclusions.
—Adjustment of antihypertensive treatment based on ABP monitoring instead of CBP measurement led to less intensive drug treatment with preservation of blood pressure control, general well-being, and inhibition of left ventricular enlargement but did not reduce the overall costs of antihypertensive treatment.



Author Affiliations

for the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Treatment of Hypertension Investigators

From the Hypertensie en Cardiovasculaire Revalidatie Eenheid, Departement voor Moleculair en Cardiovasculair Onderzoek, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Drs Staessen, Celis, and Fagard), and Academisch Centrum voor Huisartsgeneeskunde, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Dr Buntinx), Leuven, Belgium; Hypertension Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland (Dr O'Brien); and ZENECA NV, Destelbergen, Belgium (Dr Byttebier).


Footnotes

A complete list of participants in the Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Treatment of Hypertension group appears at the end of this article.

Reprints: Jan A. Staessen, MD, PhD, Klinisch Laboratorium Hypertensie, Inwendige Geneeskunde-Cardiologie, U. Z. Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium (e-mail: jan.staessen@med.kuleuven.ac.be).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
Steven A. Yarows, Jan A. Staessen, Hilde Celis, and Robert Fagard
JAMA. 1998;279(3):196-197.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prevalence and Factors Associated With Circadian Blood Pressure Patterns in Hypertensive Patients
de la Sierra et al.
Hypertension 2009;53:466-472.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement: The Case for Implementation in Primary Care
O'Brien
Hypertension 2008;51:1435-1441.
FULL TEXT  

Role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension
Chavanu et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:209-218.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Daytime and Nighttime Blood Pressure as Predictors of Death and Cause-Specific Cardiovascular Events in Hypertension
Fagard et al.
Hypertension 2008;51:55-61.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Self-Measurement of Blood Pressure at Home Reduces the Need for Antihypertensive Drugs: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Verberk et al.
Hypertension 2007;50:1019-1025.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Are Independently Associated With Albuminuria in Older Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
Moran et al.
Hypertension 2006;47:955-961.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Ambulatory Blood Pressure: A Reanalysis
Krakoff
Hypertension 2006;47:29-34.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Superiority of Ambulatory Over Clinic Blood Pressure Measurement
Gus et al.
Hypertension 2005;46:e11-e12.
FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for Home- and Office-Based Blood Pressure Monitoring--Reply
Staessen et al.
JAMA 2004;291:2315-2316.
FULL TEXT  

The Deep-Breath Test as a Diagnostic Maneuver for White-Coat Effect in Hypertensive Patients
Augustovski et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2004;17:184-189.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antihypertensive Treatment Based on Blood Pressure Measurement at Home or in the Physician's Office: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Staessen et al.
JAMA 2004;291:955-964.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Value of Ambulatory Blood-Pressure Recordings in Patients with Treated Hypertension
Clement et al.
NEJM 2003;348:2407-2415.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension
O'Brien
Heart 2003;89:571-576.
FULL TEXT  

Major Outcomes in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)
The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHA
JAMA 2002;288:2981-2997.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children and Adolescents
Simckes et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2002;41:549-564.
ABSTRACT  

Comparison of agreement between different measures of blood pressure in primary care and daytime ambulatory blood pressure
Little et al.
BMJ 2002;325:254-254.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk of cardiovascular disease in relation to achieved office and ambulatory blood pressure control in treated hypertensive subjects
Verdecchia et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:878-885.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

ABC of hypertension: Blood pressure measurement
O'Brien et al.
BMJ 2001;322:1110-1114.
FULL TEXT  

Evidence based treatment of hypertension: Measurement of blood presssure: an evidence based review
McAlister and Straus
BMJ 2001;322:908-911.
FULL TEXT  

Inpatient Monitoring on an Outpatient Basis: Managing Hypertensive Pregnancies in the Community Using Automated Technologies
Waugh et al.
Reproductive Sciences 2001;8:14-17.
ABSTRACT  

Blood pressure measurement is changing!
O'BRIEN
Heart 2001;85:3-5.
FULL TEXT  

Response to Antihypertensive Therapy in Older Patients With Sustained and Nonsustained Systolic Hypertension
Fagard et al.
Circulation 2000;102:1139-1144.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Urgent Need to Improve Hypertension Care
Trilling and Froom
Arch Fam Med 2000;9:794-801.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Modern approaches to blood pressure measurement
Staessen et al.
Occup. Environ. Med. 2000;57:510-520.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

White-Coat Hypertension and Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis: A Matching Study
Muldoon et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1507-1512.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Blood Pressure-Measuring Devices : Time to Open Pandora's Box and Regulate
Staessen
Hypertension 2000;35:1037-1037.
FULL TEXT  

Use and interpretation of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: recommendations of the British Hypertension Society
O'Brien et al.
BMJ 2000;320:1128-1134.
FULL TEXT  

Reducing Antihypertensive Medication Use in Nursing Home Patients
Froom and Trilling
Arch Fam Med 2000;9:378-383.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

1999 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension
Feldman et al.
CMAJ 1999;161:S1-17.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Diagnostic Errors in Hypertension: A Bayesian Approach
Mar et al.
Med Decis Making 1998;18:429-435.
ABSTRACT  

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
Yarows et al.
JAMA 1998;279:196-197.
FULL TEXT  

Ambulatory BP Monitoring Reduces Need for Drug Therapy
Journal Watch Cardiology 1997;1997:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORS DETECT OVERTREATMENT
JWatch General 1997;1997:2-2.
FULL TEXT  

A New Role for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring?
Pickering
JAMA 1997;278:1110-1110.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.