Costs of an emergency department-based accelerated diagnostic protocol vs hospitalization in patients with chest pain: a randomized controlled trial

R. R. Roberts, R. J. Zalenski, E. K. Mensah, R. J. Rydman, G. Ciavarella, L. Gussow, K. Das, L. M. Kampe, B. Dickover, M. F. McDermott, A. Hart, H. E. Straus, D. G. Murphy and R. Rao
Department of Emergency Medicine, Cook County Hospital/Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. rroberts@rush.edu

CONTEXT: More than 3 million patients are hospitalized yearly in the United States for chest pain. The cost is over $3 billion just for those found to be free of acute disease. New rapid diagnostic tests for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have resulted in the proliferation of accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs) and chest pain observation units. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether use of an emergency department (ED)-based ADP can reduce hospital admission rate, total cost, and length of stay (LOS) for patients needing admission for evaluation of chest pain. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing admission rate, total cost, and LOS for patients treated using ADP vs inpatient controls. Total costs were determined using empirically measured resource utilization and microcosting techniques. SETTING: A large urban public teaching hospital serving a predominantly African American and Hispanic population. PATIENTS: A sample of 165 patients was randomly selected from a larger consecutive sample of 429 patients with chest pain concurrently enrolled in an ADP diagnostic cohort trial. Eligible patients presented to the ED with clinical findings suggestive of AMI or acute cardiac ischemia (ACI) but at low risk using a validated predictive algorithm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes measured for each subject were LOS and total cost of treatment. RESULTS: The hospital admission rate for ADP vs control patients was 45.2% vs 100% (P<.001). The mean total cost per patient for ADP vs control patients was $1528 vs $2095 (P<.001). The mean LOS measured in hours for ADP vs control patients was 33.1 hours vs 44.8 hours (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, ADP saved $567 in total hospital costs per patient treated. Use of ED-based ADPs can reduce hospitalization rates, LOS, and total cost for low-risk patients with chest pain needing evaluation for possible AMI or ACI.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

New methods for improved evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department
Ekelund and Forberg
Postgrad. Med. J. 2008;84:83-86.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ischemia Modified Albumin, a Marker of Acute Ischemic Events: A Pilot Study
Talwalkar et al.
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 2008;38:132-137.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

New methods for improved evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department
Ekelund and Forberg
Emerg. Med. J. 2007;24:811-814.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of chest pain units
Clancy
BMJ 2007;335:623-624.
FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness and safety of chest pain assessment to prevent emergency admissions: ESCAPE cluster randomised trial
Goodacre et al.
BMJ 2007;335:659-659.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Structure, process and outcomes of chest pain units established in the ESCAPE Trial
Arnold et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2007;24:462-466.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Myocardial Ischemic Memory Imaging With Molecular Echocardiography
Villanueva et al.
Circulation 2007;115:345-352.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is a chest pain observation unit likely to be cost effective at my hospital? Extrapolation of data from a randomised controlled trial
Goodacre and Dixon
Emerg. Med. J. 2005;22:418-422.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain observation unit compared with routine care
Goodacre et al.
BMJ 2004;328:254.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Triage of Patients with Acute Chest Pain and Possible Cardiac Ischemia: The Elusive Search for Diagnostic Perfection
Goldman and Kirtane
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:987-995.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical decision units in the emergency department: old concepts, new paradigms, and refined gate keeping
Hassan
Emerg. Med. J. 2003;20:123-125.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Evaluation and Triage of Patients With Suspected Acute Cardiac Ischemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Udelson et al.
JAMA 2002;288:2693-2700.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

ROMEO: a rapid rule out strategy for low risk chest pain. Does it work in a UK emergency department?
Taylor et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2002;19:395-399.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A prospective, observational study of a chest pain observation unit in a British hospital
Goodacre et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2002;19:117-121.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Value of a Normal or Nonspecific Initial Electrocardiogram in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Welch et al.
JAMA 2001;286:1977-1984.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Exercise Standards for Testing and Training: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association
Fletcher et al.
Circulation 2001;104:1694-1740.
FULL TEXT  

Randomized comparison of a strategy of predischarge coronary angiography versus exercise testing in low-risk patients in a chest pain unit: in-hospital and long-term outcomes
deFilippi et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:2042-2049.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ECG ST segment elevation
British Cardiac Society Guidelines and Medical Pra and Royal College of Physicians Clinical Effectiveness
Heart 2001;85:133-142.
FULL TEXT  

Is a chest pain observation unit likely to be cost saving in a British hospital?
Goodacre et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2001;18:11-14.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk stratification in unstable angina: the role of clinical prediction models
Katz
J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1809-1811.
FULL TEXT  

Cardiac troponin T in chest pain unit patients without ischemic electrocardiographic changes: angiographic correlates and long-term clinical outcomes
deFilippi et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1827-1834.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chest pain with nondiagnostic electrocardiogram in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial of two cardiac marker regimens
CMAJ 2000;162:1561-1566.
 

Evaluation of the Patient with Acute Chest Pain
Lee and Goldman
NEJM 2000;342:1187-1195.
FULL TEXT  

Emergency cardiac care: introduction
Ewy and Ornato
J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:825-880.
FULL TEXT  

Critical Pathways : A Review
Every et al.
Circulation 2000;101:461-465.
FULL TEXT  

Should we establish chest pain observation units in the UK? A systematic review and critical appraisal of the literature
Goodacre
Emerg. Med. J. 2000;17:1-6.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk stratification of emergency department patients with acute coronary syndromes using P-Selectin
Hollander et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:95-105.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Distribution of Variable vs Fixed Costs of Hospital Care
Roberts et al.
JAMA 1999;281:644-649.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Clinical Trial of a Chest-Pain Observation Unit for Patients with Unstable Angina
Farkouh et al.
NEJM 1998;339:1882-1888.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Chest-Pain Unit -- Ready for Prime Time?
Newby and Mark
NEJM 1998;339:1930-1932.
FULL TEXT  

ED Chest-Pain Units Reduce Cost
JWatch Emergency Med. 1998;1998:23-23.
FULL TEXT  

CHEST PAIN DIAGNOSTIC ALGORITHM LOWERS COSTS
JWatch General 1997;1997:3-3.
FULL TEXT