 |
|
Is Gatekeeping Better Than Traditional Care?A Survey of Physicians' Attitudes
Ethan A. Halm, MD, MPH;
Nancyanne Causino, EdD;
David Blumenthal, MD, MPP
JAMA. 1997;278(20):1677-1681.
Abstract
| |
Context.
—Nearly all managed care plans rely on a physician "gatekeeper" to control use of specialty, hospital, and other expensive services. Gatekeeping is intended to reduce costs while maintaining or improving quality of care by increasing coordination and prevention and reducing duplicative or inappropriate care. Whether gatekeeping achieves these goals remains largely unproven.
Objective.
—To assess physicians' attitudes about the effects of gatekeeping compared with traditional care on administrative work, quality of patient care, appropriateness of resource use, and cost.
Design.
—Cross-sectional survey of primary care physicians
Setting.
—Outpatient facilities in metropolitan Boston, Mass.
Participants.
—All physicians who served as both primary care gatekeepers and traditional Blue Cross/Blue Shield providers for the employees of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. Of the 330 physicians surveyed, 202 (61%) responded.
Outcomes Measures.
—Physician ratings of the effects of gatekeeping on 21 aspects of care, including administrative work, physician-patient interactions, decision making, appropriateness of resource use, cost, and quality of care.
Results.
—Physicians reported that gatekeeping (compared with traditional care) had a positive effect on control of costs, frequency, and appropriateness of preventive services and knowledge of a patient's overall care (P<.001). They also felt that gatekeeping increased paperwork and telephone calls and negatively affected the overall quality of care, access to specialists, ability to order expensive tests and procedures, freedom in clinical decisions, time spent with patients, physicianpatient relationships, and appropriate use of hospitalizations and laboratory tests (P<.001). Overall, 32% of physicians rated gatekeeping as better than traditional care, 40% the same, 21% gatekeeping as worse, and 7% were of mixed opinion. Positive ratings of gatekeeping were associated with fewer years in clinical practice, generalist training, and experience with gatekeeping and health maintenance organization plans.
Conclusions.
—Physicians identified both positive and negative effects of gatekeeping. Overall, 72% of physicians thought gatekeeping was better than or comparable to traditional care arrangements.
Author Affiliations
From the General Internal Medicine Unit (Dr Halm) and the Health Policy Research and Development Unit (Drs Causino and Blumenthal), Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. Dr Halm is now with the Department of Health Policy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Footnotes
Reprints: Ethan A. Halm, MD, MPH, Department of Health Policy, Box 1077, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029 (e-mail: ethan_halm@smtplink.mssm.edu).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED LETTER
Gatekeeping: Good or Bad, but Never Indifferent
Albert J. Finestone, Debra Feldman, John W. Beasley, Edward Volpintesta, Deborah A. Zarin, Harold Alan Pincus, Ethan A. Halm, David Blumenthal, and Nancyanne Causino
JAMA. 1998;279(12):908-910.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
A Physicians' Agenda for Partnering With Employers and Insurers: Fresh Ideas
Berry et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:1592-1602.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Physicians' Perceptions of Managed Care: A Review of the Literature
Christianson et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2005;62:635-675.
ABSTRACT
Primary care in the United States: Organisation of primary care in the United States
Bindman and Majeed
BMJ 2003;326:631-634.
FULL TEXT
Effects of Removing Gatekeeping on Specialist Utilization by Children in a Health Maintenance Organization
Ferris et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:574-579.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Attitudes to family practice registration programmes. Survey of Korean and Norwegian family doctors
Sandvik and Cho
Fam Pract 2002;19:72-76.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Leaving Gatekeeping Behind -- Effects of Opening Access to Specialists for Adults in a Health Maintenance Organization
Ferris et al.
NEJM 2001;345:1312-1317.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Switching to Gatekeeping: Changes in Expenditures and Utilization for Children
Ferris et al.
Pediatrics 2001;108:283-290.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Self-referral in Point-of-Service Health Plans
Forrest et al.
JAMA 2001;285:2223-2231.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Measuring the Physician Perspective on Quality of Care in Health Plans
Smith et al.
Eval Health Prof 2001;24:18-35.
ABSTRACT
Balancing rationalities: gatekeeping in health care
Willems
J. Med. Ethics 2001;27:25-29.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Primary Care in the United States -- The Best of Times, the Worst of Times
Grumbach
NEJM 1999;341:2008-2010.
FULL TEXT
Resolving the Gatekeeper Conundrum: What Patients Value in Primary Care and Referrals to Specialists
Grumbach et al.
JAMA 1999;282:261-266.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Gatekeeping and Referral of Children and Adolescents to Specialty Care
Forrest et al.
Pediatrics 1999;104:28-34.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Primary Care Physicians Should Be Coordinators, Not Gatekeepers
Bodenheimer et al.
JAMA 1999;281:2045-2049.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Relationship Between Method of Physician Payment and Patient Trust
Kao et al.
JAMA 1998;280:1708-1714.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Prevalence and Patterns of Physician Referral to Clergy and Pastoral Care Providers
Daaleman and Frey
Arch Fam Med 1998;7:548-553.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effects of Managed Care on Physician-Patient Relationships, Quality of Care, and the Ethical Practice of Medicine: A Physician Survey
Feldman et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1626-1632.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Gatekeeping: Good or Bad, but Never Indifferent
Finestone et al.
JAMA 1998;279:908-910.
FULL TEXT
|
