You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 278 No. 24, December 24, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Comparison of ring block, dorsal penile nerve block, and topical anesthesia for neonatal circumcision: a randomized controlled trial

J. Lander, B. Brady-Fryer, J. B. Metcalfe, S. Nazarali and S. Muttitt
Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. janice.lander@ualberta.ca

CONTEXT: Beliefs about the safety and effectiveness of current anesthetics have resulted in many newborns being circumcised without the benefit of anesthesia. OBJECTIVE: To compare ring block, dorsal penile nerve block, a topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA), and topical placebo when used for neonatal circumcision. The placebo represented current practice, with no anesthetic for neonatal circumcision. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Antenatal units in 2 tertiary care hospitals in Edmonton, Alberta. PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive sample of 52 healthy, full-term, male newborns, aged 1 to 3 days. INTERVENTIONS: Physiological and behavioral monitoring occurred in a series of trials: baseline, drug application, preparation, circumcision, and postcircumcision. Surgical procedures defined the following 4 stages of the circumcision: cleansing, separation, clamp on, and clamp off. Methemoglobin level was assessed 6 hours after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Heart rate, cry, and methemoglobin level. RESULTS: Newborns in the untreated placebo group exhibited homogeneous responses that consisted of sustained elevation of heart rate and high-pitched cry throughout the circumcision and following. Two newborns in the placebo group became ill following circumcision (choking and apnea). The 3 treatment groups all had significantly less crying and lower heart rates during and following circumcision compared with the untreated group. The ring block was equally effective through all stages of the circumcision, whereas the dorsal penile nerve block and EMLA were not effective during foreskin separation and incision. Methemoglobin levels were highest in the EMLA group, although no newborn required treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The most effective anesthetic is the ring block; EMLA is the least effective. It is our recommendation that an anesthetic should be administered to newborns prior to undergoing circumcision.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Data Extraction Errors in Meta-analyses That Use Standardized Mean Differences
Gotzsche et al.
JAMA 2007;298:430-437.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pharmacological therapy for analgesia and sedation in the newborn.
Anand and Hall
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006;91:F448-F453.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation and Development of Potentially Better Practices to Improve Pain Management of Neonates
Sharek et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:S78-S86.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

EMLA(R) Cream Versus Dorsal Penile Nerve Block for Postcircumcision Analgesia in Children
Choi et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2003;96:396-399.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Analgesics for the Treatment of Pain in Children
Berde and Sethna
NEJM 2002;347:1094-1103.
FULL TEXT  

The Assessment and Management of Acute Pain in Infants, Children, and Adolescents
Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Fam and Task Force on Pain in Infants, Children, and Adole
Pediatrics 2001;108:793-797.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pediatric Regional Anesthesia: Beyond the Caudal
Ross et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2000;91:16-26.
FULL TEXT  

Combined Analgesia and Local Anesthesia to Minimize Pain During Circumcision
Taddio et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:620-623.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Circumcision---The Debates Goes On
Preiser; et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:681-684.
FULL TEXT  

Circumcision Policy Statement
Task Force on Circumcision
Pediatrics 1999;103:686-693.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Urology
Litwin
JAMA 1999;281:495-496.
FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of the Mogen and Gomco Clamps in Combination With Dorsal Penile Nerve Block in Minimizing the Pain of Neonatal Circumcision
Kurtis et al.
Pediatrics 1999;103:23e-23.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pain Relief for Neonatal Circumcision: Serious Design Flaws?
Van Howe; et al.
Pediatrics 1999;103:196-196.
FULL TEXT  

Circumcision and Endocarditis Prophylaxis
Storms et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:1038-1039.
FULL TEXT  

Giving Children Our Best Efforts
Lander
Clin Nurs Res 1998;7:99-102.
 

Local Anesthesia for Infants Undergoing Circumcision
Horger III et al.
JAMA 1998;279:1169-1171.
FULL TEXT  

ANESTHESIA FOR NEONATAL CIRCUMCISION
JWatch General 1998;1998:7-7.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.