Primary care physicians' satisfaction with quality of care in California capitated medical groups
E. A. Kerr, R. D. Hays, B. S. Mittman, A. L. Siu, B. Leake and R. H. Brook
Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and the Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
CONTEXT: Managed care and capitation have placed new responsibilities on
primary care physicians, including formally acting as "gatekeepers" for
specialty services and tests. Previous studies have not examined whether
primary care physicians who provide services to patients under many
coverage arrangements feel differently about caring for patients covered
under capitation vs those covered through more traditional forms of
insurance. An understanding of whether California primary care physicians
feel that they deliver a different level of quality to capitated patients
could help signal whether variations in care for patients with different
coverage forms are evolving. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether primary care
physicians in California capitated groups report different satisfaction
levels with quality of care for patients in their overall practice than for
patients covered by capitated contracts and to examine whether physicians'
satisfaction with capitated care quality is influenced by the
characteristics of the practice setting. DESIGN: Cross-sectional
questionnaire. SETTING: A total of 89 California physician groups with
capitated contracts. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 910 primary care physicians
(80% response rate). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Satisfaction with 4 aspects of
quality of care provided to patients covered by capitated contracts vs
patients overall. RESULTS: Physicians reported lower satisfaction with all
4 aspects of care for patients covered by capitated contracts than for
patients in their overall practice: 71% were very or somewhat satisfied
with relationships with capitated patients (compared with 88% for overall
practice), 64% were very or somewhat satisfied with the quality of care
they provided to capitated patients (compared with 88% for overall
practice), 51% were very or somewhat satisfied with their ability to treat
capitated patients according to their own best judgment (compared with 79%
for overall practice), and 50% were very or somewhat satisfied with their
ability to obtain specialty referrals (compared with 59% for overall
practice) (P< or =.001 for all comparisons). Being in a medical group
practice (vs an independent practice association) and having a larger
percentage of capitated patients were independently associated by
multivariate analysis with higher levels of satisfaction with capitated
quality of care (P< or =.005). CONCLUSION: These California primary care
physicians were less satisfied with the quality of care they deliver to
patients covered by capitated contracts than with the quality of care they
deliver to patients covered by other payment sources. However, those in
medical group practices and with a higher percentage of capitated patients
were more satisfied with capitated care. National expansion of capitation
should be accompanied by efforts to ensure that the satisfaction of
practicing physicians with the care they deliver does not decline.
Primary care physician specialty referral decision making: patient, physician, and health care system determinants.
Forrest et al.
Med Decis Making 2006;26:76-85.
ABSTRACT
Physicians' Perceptions of Managed Care: A Review of the Literature
Christianson et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2005;62:635-675.
ABSTRACT
Single-Payer National Health Insurance: Physicians' Views
McCormick et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:300-304.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Caring for Patients Under Medicaid Mandatory Managed Care: Perspectives of Primary Care Physicians
Chaudry et al.
Qual Health Res 2003;13:37-56.
ABSTRACT
Transmission Of Financial Incentives To Physicians By Intermediary Organizations In California
Rosenthal et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:197-205.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Consumer Beliefs and Health Plan Performance: It's Not Whether You Are in an HMO but Whether You Think You Are
Reschovsky et al.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2002;27:353-378.
ABSTRACT
Self-referral in Point-of-Service Health Plans
Forrest et al.
JAMA 2001;285:2223-2231.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Effect of Race on the Referral Process for Invasive Cardiac Procedures
Einbinder and Schulman
Med Care Res Rev 2000;57:162-180.
ABSTRACT
Primary Care in the United States -- The Best of Times, the Worst of Times
Grumbach
NEJM 1999;341:2008-2010.
FULL TEXT
Medical Professionalism in Society
Wynia et al.
NEJM 1999;341:1612-1616.
FULL TEXT
Perceptions of Medical School Seniors of the Current Changes in the U.S. Health Care System
Hojat et al.
Eval Health Prof 1999;22:169-183.
ABSTRACT
The Relationship Between Method of Physician Payment and Patient Trust
Kao et al.
JAMA 1998;280:1708-1714.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effects of Managed Care on Physician-Patient Relationships, Quality of Care, and the Ethical Practice of Medicine: A Physician Survey
Feldman et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1626-1632.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
