National health and medical services response to incidents of chemical and biological terrorism

J. B. Tucker
Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Monterey Institute of International Studies, Monterey, Calif. 93940, USA. jtucker@miis.edu

In response to the growing threat of terrorism with chemical and biological weapons, the US government has developed a national concept of operations for emergency health and medical services response. This capability was developed and tested for the first time during the Atlanta Olympic Games in the summer of 1996. In the event of a chemical or biological terrorist incident that exceeded local and state-level response capabilities, federal agencies would provide specialized teams and equipment to help manage the consequences of the attack and treat, decontaminate, and evacuate casualties. The US Congress has also established a Domestic Preparedness Program that provides for enhanced training of local first-responders and the formation of metropolitan medical strike teams in major cities around the country. While these national response capabilities are promising, their implementation to date has been problematic and their ultimate effectiveness is uncertain.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Emergency Preparedness for Biological and Chemical Incidents: A Survey of Anesthesiology Residency Programs in the United States
Candiotti et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2005;101:1135-1140.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Rest of the Story: Public Health, the News, and the 2001 Anthrax Attacks
Winett and Lawrence
The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2005;10:3-25.
ABSTRACT  

Pharmacy Preparedness for Incidents Involving Nuclear, Biological, or Chemical Weapons
Burda and Sigg
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2004;17:251-265.
ABSTRACT  

Anesthesiologists Should Be Familiar with the Management of Victims of Terrorist Attacks
Sigurdsson
Anesth. Analg. 2004;98:1743-1745.
FULL TEXT  

Biochemical terrorism: too awful to contemplate, too serious to ignore: Subjective literature review
Alexander and Klein
Br. J. Psychiatry 2003;183:491-497.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Commentary on "New Challenges for Public Health Care: Biological and Chemical Weapons Awareness, Surveillance, and Response"
Schoch-Spana
Biol Res Nurs 2003;4:251-254.
 

Chemical and biological weapons. Implications for anaesthesia and intensive care{dagger}
White
Br J Anaesth 2002;89:306-324.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Responding to Chemical, Biological, or Nuclear Terrorism: The Indirect and Long-Term Health Effects May Present the Greatest Challenge
Hyams et al.
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2002;27:273-292.
ABSTRACT  

Tularemia as a Biological Weapon: Medical and Public Health Management
Dennis et al.
JAMA 2001;285:2763-2773.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bioterrorism: Implications for the Clinical Microbiologist
Klietmann and Ruoff
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001;14:364-381.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Environment and health: 5. Impact of war
Leaning
CMAJ 2000;163:1157-1161.
FULL TEXT  

Pharmacy Preparedness for Incidents Involving Weapons of Mass Destruction
Burda and Sigg
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2000;13:141-155.
ABSTRACT  

Chemical-Biological Terrorism and Its Impact on Children: A Subject Review
Committee on Environmental Health and Committee on
Pediatrics 2000;105:662-670.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Care Delivery at the 1996 Olympic Games
Wetterhall et al.
JAMA 1998;279:1463-1468.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT