When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable

D. Rennie, V. Yank and L. Emanuel
Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco 94109, USA.

A published article is the primary means whereby new work is communicated, priority is established, and academic promotion is determined. Publication depends on trust and requires that authors be held to standards of honesty, completeness, and fairness in their reporting, and to accountability for their statements. The system of authorship, while appropriate for articles with only 1 author, has become inappropriate as the average number of authors of an article has increased; as the work of coauthors has become more specialized and relationships between them have become more complex; and as both credit and, even more, responsibility have become obscured and diluted. Credit and accountability cannot be assessed unless the contributions of those named as authors are disclosed to readers, so the system is flawed. We argue for a radical conceptual and systematic change, to reflect the realities of multiple authorship and to buttress accountability. We propose dropping the outmoded notion of author in favor of the more useful and realistic one of contributor. This requires disclosure to readers of the contributions made to the research and to the manuscript by the contributors, so that they can accept both credit and responsibility. In addition, certain named contributors take on the role of guarantor for the integrity of the entire work. The requirement that all participants be named as contributors will eliminate the artificial distinction between authors and acknowledgees and will enhance the integrity of publication.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Guest Authorship and Ghostwriting in Publications Related to Rofecoxib: A Case Study of Industry Documents From Rofecoxib Litigation
Ross et al.
JAMA 2008;299:1800-1812.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

European and US publications in the 50 highest ranking pathology journals from 2000 to 2006
Fritzsche et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2008;61:474-481.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perceptions of authorship criteria: effects of student instruction and scientific experience
Hren et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2007;33:428-432.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Authorship Issues Related to Software Tools
Miller
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:132-133.
FULL TEXT  

Bye bye by-line, hello contributors
Wager
JRSM 2006;99:542-543.
FULL TEXT  

Reinventing the Biomedical Journal
Smith
J. Neurosci. 2006;26:9837-9838.
FULL TEXT  

Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case
Sox and Rennie
ANN INTERN MED 2006;144:609-613.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Put my name on that paper: reflections on the ethics of authorship.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006;131:517-519.
 

Authorship in the AJR
Stanley
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005;185:1-2.
FULL TEXT  

Ethics and scientific publication
Benos et al.
Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2005;29:59-74.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Travelling but never arriving: reflections of a retiring editor
Smith
BMJ 2004;329:242-244.
FULL TEXT  

Authorship Criteria and Disclosure of Contributions: Comparison of 3 General Medical Journals With Different Author Contribution Forms
Bates et al.
JAMA 2004;292:86-88.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Authorship trends in the Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology: going the global way?
Kakkar
J. Clin. Pathol. 2004;57:670-670.
FULL TEXT  

Who Did What?: (Mis)Perceptions About Authors' Contributions to Scientific Articles Based on Order of Authorship
Bhandari et al.
JBJS 2003;85:1605-1609.
FULL TEXT  

Researcher Contributions and Fulfillment of ICMJE Authorship Criteria: Analysis of Author Contribution Lists in Research Articles with Multiple Authors Published in Radiology
Hwang et al.
Radiology 2003;226:16-23.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke
Hong and Bero
BMJ 2002;325:1413-1416.
FULL TEXT  

Annals of Internal Medicine at Age 75: Reflections on the Past 25 Years
Huth and Case
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:34-45.
FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of Honorary and Ghost Authorship in Cochrane Reviews
Mowatt et al.
JAMA 2002;287:2769-2771.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Hidden Research Paper
Horton
JAMA 2002;287:2775-2778.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A medical early warning system
Kassirer
CMAJ 2002;166:1151-1152.
FULL TEXT  

Pediatric Clinical Trials: Shall We Take a Lead?
Schreiner and Greeley
Anesth. Analg. 2002;94:1-3.
FULL TEXT  

News from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
Davidoff
ANN INTERN MED 2000;133:229-231.
FULL TEXT  

The Contributions of Authors
Rennie et al.
JAMA 2000;284:89-91.
FULL TEXT  

Pharmacoeconomic Analyses: Making Them Transparent, Making Them Credible
Rennie and Luft
JAMA 2000;283:2158-2160.
FULL TEXT  

Fair Conduct and Fair Reporting of Clinical Trials
Rennie
JAMA 1999;282:1766-1768.
FULL TEXT  

Disclosure of Researcher Contributions: A Study of Original Research Articles in The Lancet
Yank and Rennie
ANN INTERN MED 1999;130:661-670.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Evidence-Based Approach to Interactive Health Communication: A Challenge to Medicine in the Information Age
Robinson et al.
JAMA 1998;280:1264-1269.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Authorship: The Coin of the Realm, The Source of Complaints
Wilcox
JAMA 1998;280:216-217.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multiple Authorship: The Contribution of Senior Authors
Drenth
JAMA 1998;280:219-221.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals
Flanagin et al.
JAMA 1998;280:222-224.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Freedom and Responsibility in Medical Publication: Setting the Balance Right
Rennie
JAMA 1998;280:300-302.
FULL TEXT  

Correspondence
Bernstein et al.
JBJS 1998;80:925-6.
FULL TEXT  

Authors vs Contributors: Accuracy, Accountability, and Responsibility
Greenfield et al.
JAMA 1998;279:356-357.
FULL TEXT