 |
|
Primary Care Physician Compensation Method in Medical Groups
Does It Influence the Use and Cost of Health Services for Enrollees in Managed Care Organizations?
Douglas A. Conrad, PhD;
Charles Maynard, PhD;
Allen Cheadle, PhD;
Scott Ramsey, MD, PhD;
Miriam Marcus-Smith, MHA;
Howard Kirz, MD, MBA;
Carolyn A. Madden, PhD;
Diane Martin, PhD;
Edward B. Perrin, PhD;
Thomas Wickizer, PhD;
Brenda Zierler, PhD;
Austin Ross, MPH;
Jay Noren, MD;
Su-Ying Liang, PhC
JAMA. 1998;279:853-858.
Context.— Growth of at-risk managed care contracts between health plans and medical groups has been well documented, but less is known about the nature of financial incentives within those medical groups or their effects on health care utilization.
Objective.— To test whether utilization and cost of health services per enrollee were influenced independently by the compensation method of the enrollee's primary care physician.
Design.— Survey of medical groups contracting with selected managed care health plans, linked to 1994 plan enrollment and utilization data for adult enrollees.
Setting.— Medical groups, major managed care health plans, and their patients/enrollees in the state of Washington.
Study Participants.— Sixty medical groups in Washington, 865 primary care physicians (internal medicine, pediatrics, family practice, or general practice) from those groups and affiliated with 1 or more of 4 managed care health plans, and 200931 adult plan enrollees.
Intervention.— The effect of method of primary care physician's compensation on the utilization and cost of health services was analyzed by weighted least squares and random effects regression.
Main Outcome Measures.— Total visits, hospital days, and per member per year estimated costs.
Results.— Compensation method was not significantly (P>.30) related to utilization and cost in any multivariate analyses. Patient age (P<.001), female gender (P<.001), and plan benefit level (P<.001) were significantly positively related to visits, hospital days, and per member per year costs. The primary care physician's age was significantly negatively related (P<.001) to all 3 dependent measures.
Conclusions.— Compensation method was not significantly related to use and cost of health services per person. Enrollee, physician, and health plan benefit factors were the prime determinants of utilization and cost of health services.
From the Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
The Relationship Between Medical Practice Characteristics and Quality of Care for Cardiovascular Disease
Landon et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2008;65:167-186.
ABSTRACT
Will Financial Incentives Stimulate Quality Improvement? Reactions From Frontline Physicians
Teleki et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2006;21:367-374.
ABSTRACT
From Capitation To Fee-For-Service In Cincinnati: A Physician Group Responds To A Changing Marketplace
Super
Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:219-225.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effect of Physician Reimbursement Methodology on the Rate and Cost of Cataract Surgery
Shrank et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1733-1738.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Two Decades of Organizational Change in Health Care: What Have we Learned?
Bazzoli et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2004;61:247-331.
ABSTRACT
Increasing Value: A Research Agenda for Addressing the Managerial and Organizational Challenges Facing Health Care Delivery in the United States
Shortell
Med Care Res Rev 2004;61:12S-30S.
ABSTRACT
Penetrating the "Black Box": Financial Incentives for Enhancing the Quality of Physician Services
Conrad and Christianson
Med Care Res Rev 2004;61:37S-68S.
ABSTRACT
Assessing the Influence of Incentives on Physician and Medical Groups: A Comment
Escarce
Med Care Res Rev 2004;61:119S-123S.
From Physician to Consumer: The Effectiveness of Strategies to Manage Health Care Utilization
Flynn et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2002;59:455-481.
ABSTRACT
Transmission Of Financial Incentives To Physicians By Intermediary Organizations In California
Rosenthal et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:197-205.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Medical Service Risk and the Evolution of Provider Compensation Arrangements
Bazzoli
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2001;26:1003-1018.
Pegram v. Herdrich: On Peritonitis, Preemption, and the Elusive Goal of Managed Care Accountability
Hammer
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2001;26:767-788.
ABSTRACT
Patients' Attitudes Toward Cost Control Bonuses For Managed Care Physicians
Gallagher et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20:186-192.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Wrestling with Typology: Penetrating the "Black Box" of Managed Care by Focusing on Health Care System Characteristics
Brach et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2000;57:93-115.
ABSTRACT
Provision of Methadone Treatment in Primary Care Medical Practices: Review of the Scottish Experience and Implications for US Policy
Weinrich and Stuart
JAMA 2000;283:1343-1348.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Disclosing Physician Financial Incentives
Miller and Sage
JAMA 1999;281:1424-1430.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Primary Care Physicians' Experience of Financial Incentives in Managed-Care Systems
Grumbach et al.
NEJM 1998;339:1516-1521.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Physicians' Pay Doesn't Influence Resource Use
JWatch Psychiatry 1998;1998:21-21.
FULL TEXT
Physician Compensation Method Does Not Influence Resource Use
JWatch General 1998;1998:1-1.
FULL TEXT
|
