You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 279 No. 15, April 15, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Consensus Statement
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Prevention of Invasive Group A Streptococcal Disease Among Household Contacts of Case-Patients

Is Prophylaxis Warranted?

The Working Group on Prevention of Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections

JAMA. 1998;279:1206-1210.

Objectives.— The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) convened a Working Group in October 1995 to summarize the data regarding the risk of invasive group A streptococcal (GAS) disease among household contacts of an index patient and the potential efficacy of chemoprophylaxis. This statement on chemoprophylaxis for prevention of subsequent cases among household contacts is intended for use by public health professionals and clinicians.

Participants.— The CDC invited representatives of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, the Hospital Infection Control Practice Advisory Committee, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and experts from academia to participate.

Evidence.— Data on the transmission of GAS and risk factors for severe infection were considered. Population-based surveillance data were used to estimate the risk of invasive GAS disease among household contacts of a case patient. The potential efficacy of chemoprophylaxis was considered using estimates of the efficacy of various regimens in eradicating pharyngeal carriage.

Consensus Process.— This document summarizes the data considered by the Working Group to develop its position. The consensus achieved by group discussion at the meeting was incorporated in a draft document, which was reviewed by all members and revised to include suggested changes.

Conclusions.— The Working Group concluded that no definite recommendations can be made at this time regarding chemoprophylaxis for household contacts of persons with invasive GAS infection. More data are needed to assess the risk of subsequent cases and to determine an optimal regimen for chemoprophylaxis. Until such data are available, physicians and health departments should base decisions regarding chemoprophylaxis on their assessment of the risk associated with each individual case.




THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Family Cluster of Five Cases of Group A Streptococcal Pneumonia
Roy et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:e61-65.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical and Epidemiologic Features of Group A Streptococcal Pneumonia in Ontario, Canada
Muller et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:467-472.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Family Cluster of Streptococcal Toxic Shock Syndrome in Children: Clinical Implication and Epidemiological Investigation
Huang et al.
Pediatrics 2001;107:1181-1183.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Group A Streptococcus and the Pediatrician: Old and New
Begue
CLIN PEDIATR 1999;38:485-488.
 

Risk of Invasive Streptococcal Disease
Wiese
JAMA 1998;280:1828-1828.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.