This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (165)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship  • Review  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Deborah E. Barnes, MPH; Lisa A. Bero, PhD

JAMA. 1998;279:1566-1570.

Objective.— To determine whether the conclusions of review articles on the health effects of passive smoking are associated with article quality, the affiliations of their authors, or other article characteristics.

Data Sources.— Review articles published from 1980 to 1995 were identified through electronic searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE and from a database of symposium proceedings on passive smoking.

Article Selection.— An article was included if its stated or implied purpose was to review the scientific evidence that passive smoking is associated with 1 or more health outcomes. Articles were excluded if they did not focus specifically on the health effects of passive smoking or if they were not written in English.

Data Extraction.— Review article quality was evaluated by 2 independent assessors who were trained, followed a written protocol, had no disclosed conflicts of interest, and were blinded to all study hypotheses and identifying characteristics of articles. Article conclusions were categorized by the 2 assessors and by one of the authors. Author affiliation was classified as either tobacco industry affiliated or not, based on whether the authors were known to have received funding from or participated in activities sponsored by the tobacco industry. Other article characteristics were classified by one of the authors using predefined criteria.

Data Synthesis.— A total of 106 reviews were identified. Overall, 37% (39/106) of reviews concluded that passive smoking is not harmful to health; 74% (29/39) of these were written by authors with tobacco industry affiliations. In multiple logistic regression analyses controlling for article quality, peer review status, article topic, and year of publication, the only factor associated with concluding that passive smoking is not harmful was whether an author was affiliated with the tobacco industry (odds ratio, 88.4; 95% confidence interval, 16.4-476.5; P<.001).

Conclusions.— The conclusions of review articles are strongly associated with the affiliations of their authors. Authors of review articles should disclose potential financial conflicts of interest, and readers of review articles should consider authors' affiliations when deciding how to judge an article's conclusions.

From the Department of Public Health Biology and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley (Ms Barnes), and the Institute for Health Policy Studies, School of Medicine, and the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Bero). Ms Barnes was a research associate at the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, during the time this study was conducted.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Industry Affiliations and Scientific Conclusions
J. Daniel Heck, Kenneth J. Gorelick, Lisa A. Bero, and Deborah Barnes
JAMA. 1998;280(13):1141-1142.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Industry Sponsorship on the Results of Biomedical Research—Reply
Justin E. Bekelman, Cary P. Gross, and Yan Li
JAMA. 2003;289(19):2503.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Philip Morris involvement in the development of an air quality laboratory in El Salvador
Kummerfeldt et al.
Tobacco Control 2009;18:241-244.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Smoking and impact on health
Vineis
ERR 2008;17:182-186.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mobilising public opinion for the tobacco industry: the consumer tax alliance and excise taxes
Campbell and Balbach
Tobacco Control 2008;17:351-356.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Use Among Individuals With Schizophrenia: What Role Has the Tobacco Industry Played?
Prochaska et al.
Schizophr Bull 2008;34:555-567.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?
Saunders and Savulescu
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:214-221.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Response: The distribution and determinants of epidemiologic research
Pearce
Int J Epidemiol 2008;37:65-68.
FULL TEXT  

Corporate influences on epidemiology
Pearce
Int J Epidemiol 2008;37:46-53.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: When One Study Is Just not Enough
Garg et al.
CJASN 2008;3:253-260.
FULL TEXT  

Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort study
Yank et al.
BMJ 2007;335:1202-1205.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

State of the Evidence on Acute Asthma Management in Children: A Critical Appraisal of Systematic Reviews
Boluyt et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:1334-1343.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A review of conflict of interest, competing interest, and bias for toxicologists
Claxton
Toxicol Ind Health 2007;23:557-571.
ABSTRACT  

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration
Vandenbroucke et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:W-163-W-194.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Old ways, new means: tobacco industry funding of academic and private sector scientists since the Master Settlement Agreement
Schick and Glantz
Tobacco Control 2007;16:157-164.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

'It's interesting how few people die from smoking': Tobacco industry efforts to minimize risk and discredit health promotion
Smith
Eur J Public Health 2007;17:162-170.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Keeping a high standard in quantitative analyses, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews
Biondi-Zoccai et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;0:ehl502v1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials.
Liebeskind et al.
Neurology 2006;67:973-979.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Symposium. Relationships with Industry: Critical for New Technology or an Unnecessary Evil?
Jacobs et al.
JBJS 2006;88:1650-1663.
FULL TEXT  

Conflicts of interest: how money clouds objectivity.
Smith
JRSM 2006;99:292-297.
FULL TEXT  

Tobacco promotion and the initiation of tobacco use: assessing the evidence for causality.
DiFranza et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:e1237-e1248.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Philip Morris toxicological experiments with fresh sidestream smoke: more toxic than mainstream smoke
Schick and Glantz
Tobacco Control 2005;14:396-404.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The most important and influential papers in tobacco control: results of an online poll
Chapman
Tobacco Control 2005;14:e1-e1.
FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Money at the University of California
Glantz
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005;171:1067-1069.
FULL TEXT  

The limits of competing interest disclosures
Bero et al.
Tobacco Control 2005;14:118-126.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

ARTIST (Asian regional tobacco industry scientist team): Philip Morris' attempt to exert a scientific and regulatory agenda on Asia
Tong and Glantz
Tobacco Control 2004;13:ii118-ii124.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does the type of competing interest statement affect readers' perceptions of the credibility of research? Randomised trial
Schroter et al.
BMJ 2004;328:742-743.
FULL TEXT  

Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America
Drope et al.
Tobacco Control 2004;13:i41-47.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rating the strength of scientific evidence: relevance for quality improvement programs
Lohr
Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16:9-18.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

More misleading science from the tobacco industry
Thun
BMJ 2003;327:E237-238.
FULL TEXT  

Acknowledgement of psychiatric research funding
HENDERSON et al.
Br. J. Psychiatry 2003;183:273-275.
FULL TEXT  

Chasing the dollar: why scientists should decline tobacco industry funding
Malone and Bero
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2003;57:546-548.
FULL TEXT  

Effect of Industry Sponsorship on the Results of Biomedical Research--Reply
Bekelman et al.
JAMA 2003;289:2503-2503.
FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Industry Efforts to Defeat the Occupational Safety and Health Administration Indoor Air Quality Rule
Bryan-Jones and Bero
Am. J. Public Health 2003;93:585-592.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry
Scollo et al.
Tobacco Control 2003;12:13-20.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review
Bekelman et al.
JAMA 2003;289:454-465.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Making progress with competing interests
Smith
BMJ 2002;325:1375-1376.
FULL TEXT  

Does declaration of competing interests affect readers' perceptions? A randomised trial
Chaudhry et al.
BMJ 2002;325:1391-1392.
FULL TEXT  

Financial Conflicts of Interest in Human Subjects Research: The Problem of Institutional Conflicts
Barnes and Florencio
J Law Med Ethics 2002;30:390-402.
 

Association of Journal Quality Indicators With Methodological Quality of Clinical Research Articles
Lee et al.
JAMA 2002;287:2805-2808.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Review Articles Published in Peer-Reviewed and Throwaway Journals
Rochon et al.
JAMA 2002;287:2853-2856.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Attacks on Science: The Risks to Evidence-Based Policy
Rosenstock and Lee
Am. J. Public Health 2002;92:14-18.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Constructing ""Sound Science"" and ""Good Epidemiology"": Tobacco, Lawyers, and Public Relations Firms
Ong and Glantz
Am. J. Public Health 2001;91:1749-1757.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Smoke You Don't See: Uncovering Tobacco Industry Scientific Strategies Aimed Against Environmental Tobacco Smoke Policies
Muggli et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2001;91:1419-1423.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Conflict of Interest, Bias, and Objectivity in Research Articles
Starr et al.
JBJS 2001;83:1429-1431.
FULL TEXT  

In Search of the Magic Nutraceutical: Problems with Current Approaches
Heyland
J. Nutr. 2001;131:2591S-2595.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Policy makers' perspectives on tobacco control advocates' roles in regulation development
Montini and Bero
Tobacco Control 2001;10:218-224.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Philip Morris' new scientific initiative: an analysis
HIRSCHHORN et al.
Tobacco Control 2001;10:247-252.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The miseries of passive smoiong
Nelson
Hum Exp Toxicol 2001;20:61-83.
ABSTRACT  

Editorial I: Conflicts of interest: are they a problem for anaesthesia journals? What should we do about them?
Sneyd
Br J Anaesth 2000;85:811-814.
FULL TEXT  

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation
Jadad et al.
BMJ 2000;320:537-540.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Conflict of Interest in Economic Analyses of New Drugs Used in Oncology
Friedberg et al.
JAMA 1999;282:1453-1457.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-based Dentistry and the Dental Research Community
Bader et al.
JDR 1999;78:1480-1483.
 

Print media coverage of research on passive smoking
Kennedy and Bero
Tobacco Control 1999;8:254-260.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

From in utero and childhood exposure to parental smoking to childhood cancer: a possible link and the need for action
Sasco and Vainio
Hum Exp Toxicol 1999;18:192-201.
ABSTRACT  

Maternal passive smoking during pregnancy and fetal developmental toxicity. Part 1: gross morphological effects
Nelson et al.
Hum Exp Toxicol 1999;18:252-256.
ABSTRACT  

Institutional addiction to tobacco
COHEN et al.
Tobacco Control 1999;8:70-74.
FULL TEXT  

Editorial
Marks
J Health Psychol 1999;4:5-8.
 

Social Movements as Catalysts for Policy Change: The Case of Smoking and Guns
Nathanson
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1999;24:421-488.
ABSTRACT  

Odds ratios should be avoided when events are common
Altman et al.
BMJ 1998;317:1318-1318.
FULL TEXT  

Industry Affiliations and Scientific Conclusions
Heck et al.
JAMA 1998;280:1141-1142.
FULL TEXT  

Beyond conflict of interest
Smith
BMJ 1998;317:291-292.
FULL TEXT