You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 279 No. 2, January 14, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Cardiology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiac Diagnostic Tests
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Prognostic Significance of Exercise-Induced Left Bundle-Branch Block

Thomas A. Grady, MD; Andrew C. Chiu, MD; Claire E. Snader, MA; Thomas H. Marwick, MD, PhD; James D. Thomas, MD; Fredric J. Pashkow, MD; Michael S. Lauer, MD

JAMA. 1998;279:153-156.

Context.— Approximately 0.5% of all patients who undergo exercise testing develop a transient left bundle-branch block (LBBB) during exercise, but its prognostic significance is unclear.

Objective.— To determine whether exercise-induced LBBB is an independent predictor of mortality and cardiac morbidity.

Design.— Matched control cohort study. Between September 1990 and February 10, 1994, 17277 exercise stress tests were performed on patients.

Setting.— Tertiary care, academic medical center.

Patients.— From the cohort, 70 cases of exercise-induced LBBB were identified. The controls comprised 70 individuals without LBBB at rest or during exercise that matched the 70 cases based on age, test date, sex, prior history of coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and {beta}-blocker use.

Main Outcome Measures.— All-cause mortality, percutaneous coronary intervention, open heart surgery, nonfatal myocardial infarction, documented symptomatic or sustained ventricular tachydysrhythmia, or implantation of a permanent pacemaker or an implantable cardiac defibrillator.

Results.— A total of 37 events (28 events from the exercise-induced LBBB cases and 9 from the control cohort) occurred in 25 patients (17 exercise-induced LBBB patients and 8 control patients) during a mean follow-up period of 3.7 (0.9 years) (median, 3.8 years [range, 0.9-5.2 years]). There were 7 deaths, of which 5 occurred among patients with exercise-induced LBBB. Four-year Kaplan-Meier event rates were 19% among exercise-induced LBBB patients and 10% among controls (log rank {chi}2, 5.2; P =.02). After further adjusting for small differences in age, exercise-induced LBBB remained associated with a higher risk of primary events (adjusted relative risk, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-6.65; P =.02).

Conclusion.— Exercise-induced LBBB independently predicts a higher risk of death and major cardiac events.


From the Department of Cardiology, George M. and Linda H. Kaufman Center for Heart Failure, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Exercise-Induced Left Bundle Branch Block During Thallium 201 Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy: A Case Report
Bozkurt et al.
ANGIOLOGY 2001;52:145-148.
ABSTRACT  

Exercise-Induced LBBB Predicts Cardiac Events
Journal Watch Cardiology 1998;1998:5-5.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.