You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 279 No. 20, May 27, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (49)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA

Fatal Residential Fires

Who Dies and Who Survives?

Stephen W. Marshall; Carol W. Runyan, MPH, PhD; Shrikant I. Bangdiwala, PhD; Mary A. Linzer, MPH; Jeffrey J. Sacks, MD, MPH; John D. Butts, MD

JAMA. 1998;279:1633-1637.

Context.— The United States has one of the highest fire fatality rates in the developed world, and three quarters of these deaths are in residential fires.

Objective.— To compare characteristics of those who die and those who survive in the same residential fire.

Design.— Data on fatal residential fires were collected from the medical examiner and interviews with local fire officials.

Setting.— North Carolina.

Subjects.— Persons in residential fires with at least 1 fatality in a 1-year period.

Main Outcome Measure.— Dying vs surviving a fatal residential fire that occurred with more than 1 person at home.

Results.— Of the 190 decedents, 124 (65%) were male, 78 (41%) were home alone, and 69 (53%) of 130 adults who had blood alcohol measured were intoxicated (blood alcohol content >22 mmol/L [100 mg/dL]). Of the 254 persons present during fires in which more than 1 person was at home, 112 died. Individuals more likely to die (high-vulnerability group) were younger than 5 years or 64 years or older, had a physical or cognitive disability, or were impaired by alcohol or other drugs (risk of death for group, odds ratio [OR], 4.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.29-7.03). The presence of an adult with no physical or cognitive disabilities who was unimpaired by alcohol or other drugs (a potential rescuer) reduced the risk of death in the high-vulnerability group (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.24-0.99) but not the low-vulnerability group. Overall, a functioning smoke detector lowered the risk of death (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.83).

Conclusions.— Smoke detectors were equally effective in both low- and high-vulnerability populations. The high-vulnerability group was more likely to survive if, in addition to a smoke detector, a potential rescuer was present. Further research should seek to identify prompts that facilitate speedy egress from a burning structure and that can be incorporated into residential fire alarm systems.


From the Injury Prevention Research Center (Mr Marshall, Drs Runyan and Bangdiwala, and Ms Linzer) and Departments of Epidemiology (Mr Marshall and Dr Runyan), Health Behavior and Health Education (Dr Runyan), Biostatistics (Dr Bangdiwala), and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Dr Butts), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; US Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga (Dr Sacks); and North Carolina Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Chapel Hill (Dr Butts).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

WHO joins forces with International Society for Burn Injuries to confront global burden of burns
Mock
Inj. Prev. 2007;13:303-303.
FULL TEXT  

Using a Computer Kiosk to Promote Child Safety: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Trial in an Urban Pediatric Emergency Department
Gielen et al.
Pediatrics 2007;120:330-339.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Home safety measures and the risk of unintentional injury among young children: a multicentre case-control study
LeBlanc et al.
CMAJ 2006;175:883-887.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Pediatric Prevention via the Internet: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Christakis et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:1157-1166.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How useful are home safety behaviours for predicting childhood injury? A cohort study
Kendrick et al.
Health Educ Res 2005;20:709-718.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hand rolling cigarette papers as the reference point for regulating cigarette fire safety
Laugesen et al.
Tobacco Control 2003;12:406-410.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation Activities to Strengthen an Injury Prevention Resource Center for Urban Families
McDonald et al.
Health Promot Pract 2003;4:129-137.
ABSTRACT  

Deaths and Injuries from House Fires
Aligne et al.
NEJM 2001;345:1064-1065.
FULL TEXT  

Deaths and Injuries from House Fires
Istre et al.
NEJM 2001;344:1911-1916.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Burns: the importance of prevention
Rivara
Inj. Prev. 2000;6:243-244.
FULL TEXT  

Systematic review: Systematic review of controlled trials of interventions to promote smoke alarms
DiGuiseppi and Higgins
Arch. Dis. Child. 2000;82:341-348.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

One too many: alcohol and risk of injury
Rivara
Inj. Prev. 1998;4:249-249.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.