You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 279 No. 23, June 17, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (28)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Ethics
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Physicians Disciplined for Sex-Related Offenses

Christine E. Dehlendorf, BSc; Sidney M. Wolfe, MD

JAMA. 1998;279:1883-1888.

Context.— Physicians who abuse their patients sexually cause immense harm, and, therefore, the discipline of physicians who commit any sex-related offenses is an important public health issue that should be examined.

Objectives.— To determine the frequency and severity of discipline against physicians who commit sex-related offenses and to describe the characteristics of these physicians.

Design and Setting.— Analysis of sex-related orders from a national database of disciplinary orders taken by state medical boards and federal agencies.

Subjects.— A total of 761 physicians disciplined for sex-related offenses from 1981 through 1996.

Main Outcome Measures.— Rate and severity of discipline over time for sex-related offenses and specialty, age, and board certification status of disciplined physicians.

Results.— The number of physicians disciplined per year for sex-related offenses increased from 42 in 1989 to 147 in 1996, and the proportion of all disciplinary orders that were sex related increased from 2.1% in 1989 to 4.4% in 1996 (P<.001 for trend). Discipline for sex-related offenses was significantly more severe (P<.001) than for non–sex-related offenses, with 71.9% of sex-related orders involving revocation, surrender, or suspension of medical license. Of 761 physicians disciplined, the offenses committed by 567 (75%) involved patients, including sexual intercourse, rape, sexual molestation, and sexual favors for drugs. As of March 1997, 216 physicians (39.9%) disciplined for sex-related offenses between 1981 and 1994 were licensed to practice. Compared with all physicians, physicians disciplined for sex-related offenses were more likely to practice in the specialties of psychiatry, child psychiatry, obstetrics and gynecology, and family and general practice (all P<.001) than in other specialties and were older than the national physician population, but were no different in terms of board certification status.

Conclusions.— Discipline against physicians for sex-related offenses is increasing over time and is relatively severe, although few physicians are disciplined for sexual offenses each year. In addition, a substantial proportion of physicians disciplined for these offenses are allowed to either continue to practice or return to practice.


From the Public Citizen's Health Research Group, Washington, DC. Ms Dehlendorf is currently a medical student at the University of Washington, Seattle.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Educating Physicians to Prevent Sex-Related Contact With Patients
George O. Thomasson, Christine E. Dehlendorf, and Sidney M. Wolfe
JAMA. 1999;281(5):419-420.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

Physicians Disciplined by a State Medical Board
James Morrison and Peter Wickersham
JAMA. 1998;279(23):1889-1893.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of the Medical Profession in Physician Discipline
F. Douglas Scutchfield and Regina Benjamin
JAMA. 1998;279(23):1915-1916.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Potential for abuse in the VCT counselling room: service provider's perceptions in Kenya
Hamilton et al.
Health Policy Plan 2008;23:390-396.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sanctions and Recidivism: An Evaluation of Physician Discipline by State Medical Boards
Grant and Alfred
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2007;32:867-885.
ABSTRACT  

Improving the health of psychiatrists
Firth-Cozens
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 2007;13:161-168.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Naked
Gawande
NEJM 2005;353:645-648.
FULL TEXT  

Sex and the surgery: students' attitudes and potential behaviour as they pass through a modern medical curriculum
Goldie et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2004;30:480-486.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Characteristics Associated With Physician Discipline: A Case-Control Study
Kohatsu et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:653-658.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primer on Medical Professionalism
Diaz and Stamp
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2004;94:206-209.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sexualization of the doctor-patient relationship: is it ever ethically permissible?
Hall
Fam Pract 2001;18:511-515.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Professionalism and Medicine's Social Contract
Cruess et al.
JBJS 2000;82:1189-1189.
FULL TEXT  

Educating Physicians to Prevent Sex-Related Contact With Patients
Thomasson et al.
JAMA 1999;281:419-420.
FULL TEXT  

The Role of the Medical Profession in Physician Discipline
Scutchfield and Benjamin
JAMA 1998;279:1915-1916.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.