You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 280 No. 13, October 7, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Health Law and Ethics
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (72)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Substance Abuse/ Alcoholism
 •Tobacco
 •Law and Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Prying Open the Door to the Tobacco Industry's Secrets About Nicotine

The Minnesota Tobacco Trial

Richard D. Hurt, MD; Channing R. Robertson, PhD

JAMA. 1998;280:1173-1181.

In 1994 the state of Minnesota filed suit against the tobacco industry. This trial is now history, but its legacy will carry on into the 21st century because of the revelations contained in the millions of pages of previously secret internal tobacco industry documents made public in the trial. In this article, we review representative documents relating to nicotine addiction, low-tar, low-nicotine cigarettes, and cigarette design and nicotine manipulation in cigarette manufacture. These documents reveal that for decades, the industry knew and internally acknowledged that nicotine is an addictive drug and cigarettes are the ultimate nicotine delivery device; that nicotine addiction can be perpetuated and even enhanced through cigarette design alterations and manipulations; and that "health-conscious" smokers could be captured by low-tar, low-nicotine products, all the while ensuring the marketplace viability of their products. Appreciation of tobacco industry strategies over the past decades is essential to formulate an appropriate legislative and public policy response. We propose key elements for such legislation and urge no legal or financial immunity for the tobacco industry.


From the Nicotine Dependence Center, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn (Dr Hurt), and the School of Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (Dr Robertson).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Towards evidence-based marketing: the case of childhood obesity
Stead et al.
Marketing Theory 2007;7:379-406.
ABSTRACT  

Pharmacological and Chemical Effects of Cigarette Additives
Rabinoff et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2007;97:1981-1991.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The temporal relationship between advertising and sales of low-tar cigarettes
Reed et al.
Tobacco Control 2006;15:436-441.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tobacco industry litigation position on addiction: continued dependence on past views
Henningfield et al.
Tobacco Control 2006;15:iv27-iv36.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Consumer acceptable risk: how cigarette companies have responded to accusations that their products are defective
Cummings et al.
Tobacco Control 2006;15:iv84-iv89.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cessation Among Smokers of "Light" Cigarettes: Results From the 2000 National Health Interview Survey
Tindle et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2006;96:1498-1504.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Brand differences of free-base nicotine delivery in cigarette smoke: the view of the tobacco industry documents
Ferris Wayne et al.
Tobacco Control 2006;15:189-198.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The most important and influential papers in tobacco control: results of an online poll
Chapman
Tobacco Control 2005;14:e1-e1.
FULL TEXT  

Toward a comprehensive long term nicotine policy
Gray et al.
Tobacco Control 2005;14:161-165.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The tobacco industry in Asia: revelations in the corporate documents
Mackay
Tobacco Control 2004;13:ii1-ii3.
FULL TEXT  

Reducing tobacco addiction through tobacco product regulation
Henningfield et al.
Tobacco Control 2004;13:132-135.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Looking for the Smoking Gun: Principled Sampling in Creating the Tobacco Industry Documents Corpus
Kretzschmar et al.
Journal of English Linguistics 2004;32:31-47.
ABSTRACT  

Smoker and ex-smoker reactions to cigarettes claiming reduced risk
Shiffman et al.
Tobacco Control 2004;13:78-84.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

European Union policy on smokeless tobacco: a statement in favour of evidence based regulation for public health
Bates et al.
Tobacco Control 2003;12:360-367.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Smoke-filled rooms: a postmortem on the tobacco deal: By W Kip Viscusi, University of Chicago Press, 2002, $27.50, 263 pp, ISBN 0-226-85747-6
Cummings
Tobacco Control 2003;12:111-112.
FULL TEXT  

Simultaneous Analysis of Nicotine, Nicotine Metabolites, and Tobacco Alkaloids in Serum or Urine by Tandem Mass Spectrometry, with Clinically Relevant Metabolic Profiles
Moyer et al.
Clin. Chem. 2002;48:1460-1471.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents
Kozlowski and O'Connor
Tobacco Control 2002;11:i40-50.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Necessity of Global Tobacco Regulations
Bettcher and Subramaniam
JAMA 2001;286:2737-2737.
FULL TEXT  

Historical perspective: the low tar lie
SHOPLAND
Tobacco Control 2001;10:i1-3.
FULL TEXT  

Smokers' beliefs about ""Light"" and ""Ultra Light"" cigarettes
Shiffman et al.
Tobacco Control 2001;10:i17-23.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Test of ""Light"" cigarette counter-advertising using a standard test of advertising effectiveness
Shiffman et al.
Tobacco Control 2001;10:i33-40.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Concluding remarks
WILKENFIELD
Tobacco Control 2001;10:i45-47.
FULL TEXT  

Whose standard is it, anyway? How the tobacco industry determines the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards for tobacco and tobacco products
Bialous and Yach
Tobacco Control 2001;10:96-104.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Why Britain needs a nicotine regulation authority
Britton and McNeill
BMJ 2001;322:1077-1078.
FULL TEXT  

Tobacco dependence treatment: scientific challenges; public health opportunities
Henningfield
Tobacco Control 2000;9:i3-10.
FULL TEXT  

It's Time for a Change: Cigarette Smokers Deserve Meaningful Information About Their Cigarettes
Wilkenfeld et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:90-92.
FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Dependence: Global Public Health Potential for New Medications Development and Indications
HENNINGFIELD et al.
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2000;909:247-256.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Future Without Tobacco: A Call for Papers
Cole
JAMA 1999;282:1284-1284.
FULL TEXT  

Eliminating nicotine in cigarettes
SHATENSTEIN; et al.
Tobacco Control 1999;8:106-109.
FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Litigation, Round Three:It's the Money and the Principle
Kapp
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1999;24:811-814.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.