This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (83)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Informatics/ Internet in Medicine  • Internet  • Alert me on articles by topic

Stephen M. Borowitz, MD; Jeremy C. Wyatt, MRCP, DM, FACMI

JAMA. 1998;280:1321-1324.

Context.— Despite the common use of e-mail, little beyond anecdote or impressions has been published on patient-clinician e-mail consultation.

Objective.— To report our experiences with free-of-charge e-mail consultations.

Design.— Retrospective review of all e-mail consultation requests received between November 1, 1995, and June 31, 1998.

Setting and Participants.— Consecutive e-mail consultation requests sent to the Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology at the Children's Medical Center of the University of Virginia in Charlottesville.

Main Outcome Measures.— Number of consultation requests per month, time required to respond, who initiated the request and their geographic origin, and the kind of information requested in the consultation.

Results.— During the 33-month period studied, we received 1239 requests, an average (SD) of 37.6 (15.9) each month. A total of 1001 consultation requests (81%) were initiated by parents, relatives, or guardians, 126 (10%) by physicians, and 112 (9%) by other health care professionals. Consultation requests were received from 39 states and 37 other countries. In 855 requests (69%), there was a specific question about the cause of a particular child's symptoms, diagnostic tests, and/or therapeutic interventions. In 112 (9%), the requester sought a second opinion about diagnosis or treatment for a particular child, and 272 consultations (22%) requested general information concerning a disorder, treatment, or medication without reference to a particular child. A total of 1078 requests (87%) were answered within 48 hours of the initial request. On average, reading and responding to each e-mail took slightly less than 4 minutes.

Conclusion.— E-mail provides a means for parents, guardians, and health care professionals to obtain patient and disease-specific information from selected medical consultants in a timely manner.

From the University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville (Dr Borowitz); and the School of Public Policy, University College London, London, England (Dr Wyatt).

RELATED ARTICLES

Responses to Unsolicited Patient E-mail Requests for Medical Advice on the World Wide Web
Gunther Eysenbach and Thomas L. Diepgen
JAMA. 1998;280(15):1333-1335.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

On Call and Online: Sociohistorical, Legal, and Ethical Implications of E-mail for the Patient-Physician Relationship
Alissa R. Spielberg
JAMA. 1998;280(15):1353-1359.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Digital Doctoring—Opportunities and Challenges in Electronic Patient-Physician Communication
Tom Ferguson
JAMA. 1998;280(15):1361-1362.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Parents are reluctant to use technological means of communication in pediatric day care: [Les parents resistent a l'idee d'utiliser des moyens technologiques de communications dans les soins pediatriques de jour]
Murto et al.
Canadian J. Anesthesia 2008;55:214-222.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient-Physician E-mail: An Opportunity to Transform Pediatric Health Care Delivery
Rosen and Kwoh
Pediatrics 2007;120:701-706.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Web Relationships Between Physicians and Individuals Seeking Information on Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases
Grazi
Arch Surg 2006;141:1176-1182.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient perceptions about a novel form of patient-assisted teledermatology.
Eminovic et al.
Arch Dermatol 2006;142:648-649.
FULL TEXT  

eHealth and the future: promise or peril?
Wyatt and Sullivan
BMJ 2005;331:1391-1393.
FULL TEXT  

E-mail and the Psychiatrist-Patient Relationship
Recupero
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2005;33:465-475.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of an Internet-Based System for Doctor-Patient Communication on Health Care Spending
Baker et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005;12:530-536.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Enhancing Doctor-Patient Communication Using Email: A Pilot Study
Leong et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2005;18:180-188.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Content Analysis of E-mail Communication Between Primary Care Providers and Parents
Anand et al.
Pediatrics 2005;115:1283-1288.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Content Analysis of E-mail Communication between Patients and Their Providers: Patients Get the Message
White et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2004;11:260-267.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Impact of the Internet on Cancer Outcomes
Eysenbach
CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:356-371.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

I am a good patient, believe it or not
Jadad et al.
BMJ 2003;326:1293-1295.
FULL TEXT  

Use of the Internet and E-mail for Health Care Information: Results From a National Survey
Baker et al.
JAMA 2003;289:2400-2406.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Adverse Drug Events in Ambulatory Care
Gandhi et al.
NEJM 2003;348:1556-1564.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The internet
Al-Shahi et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002;73:619-628.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Parent and Physician Attitudes Regarding Electronic Communication in Pediatric Practices
Kleiner et al.
Pediatrics 2002;109:740-744.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

"You've Got Mail": Issues in Communicating With Patients and Their Families by E-Mail
Bauchner et al.
Pediatrics 2002;109:954-956.
FULL TEXT  

How should hamsters run? Some observations about sufficient patient time in primary care
Mechanic
BMJ 2001;323:266-268.
FULL TEXT  

The new NHS information technology strategy
Wyatt and Keen
BMJ 2001;322:1378-1379.
FULL TEXT  

Internet Marketing Offers an Excellent Potential for Increasing One's Practice
Rothschild
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:600-602.
FULL TEXT  

Electronic communication in ethics committees: experience and challenges
Eiser et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2001;27:i30-32.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Back to basics on NHS networking
Keen and Wyatt
BMJ 2000;321:875-878.
FULL TEXT  

Information technology for quality health care: a summary of United Kingdom and United States experiences
Detmer
Qual Saf Health Care 2000;9:181-189.
FULL TEXT  

Teleradiology as a Foundation for an Enterprise-wide Health Care Delivery System
Dionisio et al.
RadioGraphics 2000;20:1137-1150.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Practicing Dentistry in the Age of Telemedicine
GOLDER and BRENNAN
Journal of the American Dental Association 2000;131:734-744.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Proposed Solution for Addressing the Challenge of Patient Cries for Help Through an Analysis of Unsolicited Electronic Mail
D'Alessandro et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:74e-74.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Some Things Have Not Changed
Clever
ANN INTERN MED 2000;132:85-89.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patients, Physicians, and E-mail
Lewis et al.
Arch Dermatol 2000;136:121-122.
FULL TEXT  

Legal Issues Concerning Electronic Health Information: Privacy, Quality, and Liability
Hodge et al.
JAMA 1999;282:1466-1471.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health information and interaction on the internet: a survey of female urinary incontinence
Sandvik
BMJ 1999;319:29-32.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Technical and Clinical Progress in Telemedicine
Strode et al.
JAMA 1999;281:1066-1068.
FULL TEXT  

Digital Doctoring--Opportunities and Challenges in Electronic Patient-Physician Communication
Ferguson
JAMA 1998;280:1361-1362.
FULL TEXT