This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (28)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letter  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • HIV/AIDS  • Pathology & Laboratory Medicine  • Infectious Diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Bernard M. Branson, MD

JAMA. 1998;280:1699-1701.

Context.— Home sample collection (HSC) tests allow persons to test themselves for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection at home without medical supervision. Characterizing the use of such tests can help assess their potential effect on public health efforts to prevent and control HIV.

Objective.— To describe use of HIV HSC tests.

Design.— Retrospective descriptive analysis from data collected by test manufacturers during 1996 and 1997.

Setting.— United States.

Participants.— Volunteer sample of consumers who used either of 2 HSC tests.

Main Outcome Measures.— Demographic and behavioral aspects of users.

Results.— During the first year of availability, 174,316 HIV HSC tests were submitted to the manufacturers for analysis; 0.9% of the results were positive for HIV, and 97% of all users called to learn test results. Survey responses from 70,620 HIV-negative and 865 HIV-positive users revealed that most were men, white, and aged 25 to 34 years; HIV prevalence was highest among nonwhites, aged 35 to 44 years, men who have sex with men, and injection drug users. Bisexual men accounted for a large proportion of HIV-positive users. Nearly 60% of all users and 49% of those who tested HIV positive had never been tested before. Telephone counselors found that 23% of HIV-positive users already had a source of follow-up care, 65% accepted referrals, and 12% had tested themselves to evaluate the effects of antiretroviral therapy.

Conclusions.— Home sample collection tests for HIV were used by persons who were at risk for HIV and by persons who did not use other testing. Most HIV-positive users either had a source of medical care or received referrals.

From the National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Home Sample Collection for HIV Testing
Kathryn A. Phillips, Steve Morin, Tom Coates, Susan Fernyak, Abby Marsh, Leslynette Ramos-Irizarry, and Barnard M. Branson
JAMA. 2000;283(2):198-199.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Rapid HIV testing at home: does it solve a problem or create one?
Walensky and Paltiel
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:459-462.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Home Testing for HIV
Wright and Katz
NEJM 2006;354:437-440.
FULL TEXT  

Screening for HIV: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Chou et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:55-73.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

"Do-It-Yourself" Dementia Testing: Issues Regarding an Alzheimer's Home Screening Test
Kier and Molinari
Gerontologist 2003;43:295-301.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Home HIV testing: Why not in Canada?
CMAJ 2000;162:1545-1545.
 

Le depistage du VIH a domicile : pourquoi pas au Canada?
CMAJ 2000;162:1547-1547.
 

Home Sample Collection for HIV Testing
Phillips et al.
JAMA 2000;283:198-199.
FULL TEXT  

HIV Testing After Implementation of Name-Based Reporting
Aragon et al.
JAMA 1999;281:1377-1380.
FULL TEXT