This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (50)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The Contribution of Senior Authors

Joost P. H. Drenth, MD, PhD

JAMA. 1998;280:219-221.

Context.— The number of authors per article has increased markedly in recent years. Little is known about the hierarchical order of authorship and its change over time.

Objective.— To assess the change in number and profile of authors of original articles published over a 20-year period in BMJ . It was hypothesized that the number of authors increased over this 20-year period and that it was the senior scientists who benefited most.

Design.— Comparative descriptive analysis of the number and academic rank of authors who published original articles in BMJ volumes 270 (1975), 280 (1980), 290 (1985), 300 (1990), and 310 (1995).

Main Outcome Measures.— The specific academic rank, order, and number of authors for each original article. Eight categories of authorship were distinguished as follows: 1, professor; 2, department chairperson; 3, consultant; 4, senior registrar; 5, lecturer and/or registrar; 6, medical student; 7, house officer; and 8, miscellaneous.

Results.— The number of original articles published per year decreased from 262 (1975) to 125 (1995). The mean number (SD) of authors per article increased steadily from 3.21 (SD, 1.89) (1975) to 4.46 (SD, 2.04) (1995). Most authors belonged to category 3, and its proportion varied from 24.7% (1975) to 22.6% (1995), while category 1 grew from 13.2% to 20.3%. Category 5 authorship dropped from 24.3% (1975) to 15.8% (1995). With regard to first authorship, category 1 more than doubled from 8.0% (1975) to 16.8% (1995) compared with category 5 whose proportion decreased from 34.0% to 24.8%. Most last authors were from category 1, 20.4% (1975), growing to 29.0% (1995).

Conclusion.— Over the last 20 years the number of BMJ authors of original articles increased, mainly because of the rise of authorship among professors and department chairpersons.

From the Department of Medicine, University Hospital St Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Authorship and Bylines
Castillo
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1455-1456.
FULL TEXT  

European and US publications in the 50 highest ranking pathology journals from 2000 to 2006
Fritzsche et al.
J. Clin. Pathol. 2008;61:474-481.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge
Wuchty et al.
Science 2007;316:1036-1039.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism
Kwok
J. Med. Ethics 2005;31:554-556.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Society of Gynecologic Investigation: What Gets Published?
Gandhi and Gilbert
Reproductive Sciences 2004;11:562-565.
ABSTRACT  

Who Did What?: (Mis)Perceptions About Authors' Contributions to Scientific Articles Based on Order of Authorship
Bhandari et al.
JBJS 2003;85:1605-1609.
FULL TEXT