This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (83)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letter  • Related articles  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship  • Quality of Care  • Quality of Care, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Roy M. Pitkin, MD; Mary Ann Branagan; Leon F. Burmeister, PhD

JAMA. 1999;281:1110-1111.

Context  The section of a research article most likely to be read is the abstract, and therefore it is particularly important that the abstract reflect the article faithfully.

Objective  To assess abstracts accompanying research articles published in 6 medical journals with respect to whether data in the abstract could be verified in the article itself.

Design  Analysis of simple random samples of 44 articles and their accompanying abstracts published during 1 year (July 1, 1996-June 30, 1997) in each of 5 major general medical journals (Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, JAMA, Lancet, and New England Journal of Medicine) and a consecutive sample of 44 articles published during 15 months (July 1, 1996-August 15, 1997) in the CMAJ.

Main Outcome Measure  Abstracts were considered deficient if they contained data that were either inconsistent with corresponding data in the article's body (including tables and figures) or not found in the body at all.

Results  The proportion of deficient abstracts varied widely (18%-68%) and to a statistically significant degree (P<.001) among the 6 journals studied.

Conclusions  Data in the abstract that are inconsistent with or absent from the article's body are common, even in large-circulation general medical journals.

Author Affiliations: Obstetrics & Gynecology, Los Angeles, Calif (Dr Pitkin); Chest, Northbrook, Ill (Ms Branagan); and Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Burmeister).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Effectiveness of a Journal Intervention to Improve Abstract Quality
Roy M. Pitkin, Mary Ann Branagan, and Leon F. Burmeister
JAMA. 2000;283(4):481.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

The Need for Concrete Improvement in Abstract Quality
Margaret A. Winker
JAMA. 1999;281(12):1129-1130.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

March 24/31, 1999
JAMA. 1999;281(12):1143-1144.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Getting a better grip on research: the comfort of opinion
Maskrey et al.
InnovAiT 2009;2:679-686.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Latin American Social Medicine Database: a resource for epidemiology
Waitzkin et al.
Int J Epidemiol 2008;37:724-728.
FULL TEXT  

Better reporting of randomized trials in biomedical journal and conference abstracts
Hopewell et al.
Journal of Information Science 2008;34:162-173.
ABSTRACT  

An untold story?
Lenzer and Brownlee
BMJ 2008;336:532-534.
FULL TEXT  

Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration
Boutron et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:295-309.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bufala spotting, part one: assessing research papers
Jefferson and Zarra
JRSM 2007;100:38-39.
FULL TEXT  

DNA polymorphisms and renal disease: a critical appraisal of studies presented at the annual ERA/EDTA and ASN conferences in 2004 and 2005
Mondry et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:2775-2779.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Transition From Meeting Abstract to Full-length Journal Article for Randomized Controlled Trials
Toma et al.
JAMA 2006;295:1281-1287.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Abstracts: problems classified from the user perspective
Montesi and Urdiciain
Journal of Information Science 2005;31:515-526.
ABSTRACT  

Keeping up: learning in the workplace
Wyatt and Sullivan
BMJ 2005;331:1129-1132.
FULL TEXT  

From conference abstract to full paper: differences between data presented in conferences and journals
Rosmarakis et al.
FASEB J. 2005;19:673-680.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Addressing the Limitations of Structured Abstracts
Falagas and Vergidis
ANN INTERN MED 2004;141:576-577.
FULL TEXT  

Accuracy of Abstracts for Original Research Articles in Pharmacy Journals
Ward et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2004;38:1173-1177.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relation between randomized controlled trials published in leading general medical journals and the global burden of disease
Rochon et al.
CMAJ 2004;170:1673-1677.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Abstracts in 3 Clinical Dermatology Journals
Dupuy et al.
Arch Dermatol 2003;139:589-593.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving the Clarity of Journal Abstracts in Psychology: The Case for Structure
Hartley
Science Communication 2003;24:366-379.
ABSTRACT  

Effects of Technical Editing in Biomedical Journals: A Systematic Review
Wager and Middleton
JAMA 2002;287:2821-2824.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Observational Study of Orthopaedic Abstracts and Subsequent Full-Text Publications
Bhandari et al.
JBJS 2002;84:615-621.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Commentary: Toward systematic reviews in epidemiology
Bracken
Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:954-957.
FULL TEXT  

How Accurate Are References in Clinical Chemistry?
Siebers
Clin. Chem. 2001;47:606-607.
FULL TEXT  

Data Inconsistencies in Abstracts of Articles in Clinical Chemistry
Siebers
Clin. Chem. 2001;47:149-149.
FULL TEXT  

Features of DESCRIPTION META tags in public home pages
Craven
Journal of Information Science 2000;26:303-311.
ABSTRACT  

Are structured abstracts more or less accurate than traditional ones? A study in the psychological literature
Hartley
Journal of Information Science 2000;26:273-277.
ABSTRACT  

Effectiveness of a Journal Intervention to Improve Abstract Quality
Pitkin et al.
JAMA 2000;283:481-481.
FULL TEXT