You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 281 No. 17, May 5, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (90)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Colorectal Surgery
 •Oncology
 •Colon Cancer
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Predicting Advanced Proximal Colonic Neoplasia With Screening Sigmoidoscopy

Theodore R. Levin, MD; Albert Palitz, MD; Seymour Grossman, MD; Carol Conell, PhD; Laura Finkler, MPH; Lynn Ackerson, PhD; Greg Rumore, MD; Joe V. Selby, MD, MPH

JAMA. 1999;281:1611-1617.

Context  Indications are not well defined for follow-up colonoscopy for all patients with distal colonic tubular adenomas (TAs) found at screening sigmoidoscopy.

Objective  To determine whether distal adenoma size, number, and villous histology, along with family history and age, are predictors of advanced proximal colonic neoplasia.

Design  Cross-sectional analysis conducted between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1995.

Setting  Large group-model health maintenance organization in northern California.

Patients  A total of 2972 asymptomatic subjects aged 50 years or older undergoing colonoscopy as follow-up to a screening sigmoidoscopy.

Main Outcome Measure  Based on sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and pathology reports, occurrence of advanced proximal neoplasia, defined as adenocarcinoma or TAs 1 cm or larger or with villous features or severe dysplasia located beyond sigmoidoscopic view.

Results  The prevalence of advanced proximal neoplasia was similar among patients with no TAs at sigmoidoscopy, those with TAs less than 1 cm in diameter, and those with TAs 1 cm in diameter or larger (prevalence, 5.3%, 5.5%, and 5.6%, respectively). Of patients with a distal tubulovillous or villous adenoma, 12.1% had advanced proximal neoplasia. In multivariate analyses, having a distal tubulovillous adenoma or villous adenoma was the strongest predictor of advanced proximal neoplasia (odds ratio, 2.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.69-3.14). Age of 65 years or older, having more than 1 adenoma, and a positive family history of colorectal cancer were also significant predictors. Distal adenoma size was not a significant predictor in any multivariate analyses.

Conclusions  Advanced proximal neoplasia is not uncommon in subjects with or without distal TAs, but subjects with advanced distal histology and those older than 65 years are at increased risk. Age-specific screening using sigmoidoscopy starting at ages 50 to 55 years and colonoscopy after age 65 years may be justified.


Author Affiliations: Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program (Drs Levin, Grossman, Conell, Ackerson, and Selby and Ms Finkler), and the Department of Pathology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center (Dr Rumore), Oakland, Calif; Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Martinez, Calif (Dr Palitz); and the Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Levin).


RELATED ARTICLE

May 5, 1999
JAMA. 1999;281(17):1663-1664.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology
Levin et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:130-160.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Meat, Meat Cooking Methods and Preservation, and Risk for Colorectal Adenoma
Sinha et al.
Cancer Res. 2005;65:8034-8041.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Colonoscopic Screening of Women for Colorectal Neoplasia
Levin et al.
NEJM 2005;353:844-846.
FULL TEXT  

Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial: Results From the Baseline Screening Examination of a Randomized Trial
Weissfeld et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:989-997.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group
Levin et al.
Gut 2005;54:807-813.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk of Proximal Colon Neoplasia With Distal Hyperplastic Polyps: A Meta-analysis
Lin et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:382-390.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Subsite-Specific Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rates and Stage Distributions among Asians and Pacific Islanders in the United States, 1995 to 1999
Wu et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:1215-1222.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Using Risk for Advanced Proximal Colonic Neoplasia To Tailor Endoscopic Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Imperiale et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:959-965.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Scientific Review
Walsh and Terdiman
JAMA 2003;289:1288-1296.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Grading of distal colorectal adenomas as predictors for proximal colonic neoplasia and choice of endoscope in population screening: experience from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention study (NORCCAP)
Gondal et al.
Gut 2003;52:398-403.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Detection of Proximal Adenomatous Polyps With Screening Sigmoidoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Screening Colonoscopy
Lewis et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:413-420.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Baseline Findings of the Italian Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of "Once-Only Sigmoidoscopy"--SCORE
Segnan et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1763-1772.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidance on large bowel surveillance for people with two first degree relatives with colorectal cancer or one first degree relative diagnosed with colorectal cancer under 45 years
Dunlop
Gut 2002;51:v17-20.
FULL TEXT  

Results of Screening Colonoscopy among Persons 40 to 49 Years of Age
Imperiale et al.
NEJM 2002;346:1781-1785.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnostic Yield of Barium Enema Examination after Incomplete Colonoscopy
Chong et al.
Radiology 2002;223:620-624.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Sherrick et al.
NEJM 2000;343:1651-1654.
FULL TEXT  

Use of Colonoscopy to Screen Asymptomatic Adults for Colorectal Cancer
Lieberman et al.
NEJM 2000;343:162-168.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk of Advanced Proximal Neoplasms in Asymptomatic Adults According to the Distal Colorectal Findings
Imperiale et al.
NEJM 2000;343:169-174.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Endoscopic Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Cost-Saving Analysis
Loeve et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:557-563.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Implementing screening for colorectal cancer
Atkin
BMJ 1999;319:1212-1213.
FULL TEXT  

What Sigmoidoscopic Findings Predict Proximal Colon Neoplasia?
JWatch General 1999;1999:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.